You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Date: 28 June 2016

Time: 15:25-15:35 UTC 

Recordings: See here

Transcript: EN 

Slides: /

GAC Input:

  • Spain: Nielsen survey would be more representative if users who are average users of Internet had been surveyed as they are more prone to be victims of fraud. 
    --> It was not a filtering question but a question that was used for cross-tabulation. 
  • Spain: Take into account the conclusion that more than 70% respondents favored some level of registration restrictions on both legacy and new gTLDs as this is an increase from 2015. 
  • Spain: Survey should have been broader. 
  • Denmark/UK: Have new gTLD rounds had an impact on cost benefit? 
    --> Competition/Consumer Choice Team is responsible for the cost benefit analysis. Cost is often in form of defensive registrations although difficult to measure. 
  • Denmark: Will defensive registration be included in the survey and report?
    --> We are going to conduct a study of brand owners probably through INTA to get an understanding of costs associated with the new gTLD program. 
  • UK: Will the review look at opportunities for small and medium-size enterprises? 
    --> We will ask applicants the degree to which costs was a barrier to entry. The Applicant Support Program was underused.
  • Switzerland: How well are you coordinating with the PDP on subsequent procedures?
    --> We have two PDP WG liaisons on the CCT-RT. We have regular coordination calls with PDP WG leadership. The PDP WG will be waiting for results on some of our topics. 
  • Paraguay: When is the economic study or analysis going to be available?
    --> Fall 2016. We are having difficulty to find some outside sources for data. 

 

  • No labels