You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 118 Next »

Topic

Entry Date

Target Date

Responsible Council Member (if applicable)

Responsible Staff member (if applicable)

Additional Notes

Status / Action Item

Helsinki Meeting Planning


10/327/6

Donna Austin, Volker Greimann

Glen de Saint Gery / Marika Konings 
  • Donna & Volker to participate in a small group that is forming at the request of the Board to look at the schedule for meeting B
  • Council members to identify a list of issues or topics that the GNSO would be interested in discussing at small or large cross-community sessions during the Helsinki meeting
  • For latest draft schedule, see https://community.icann.org/x/_o5CAw.
SSAC Liaison to GNSO Council / GNSO Council liaison to the SSACBA wrap up session12/5James BladelJulie Hedlund 

James to report back to to Patrik on options discussed on Council mailing list:

  • Change the format of the GNSO/SSAC interactions, post topics in advance and promote a more free flowing discussion.  Come prepared with questions, and encourage SSAC to tailor their materials & updates to active GNSO work.
  • Leverage the overlap – encourage members who participate in both communities, and ICANN Staff, to highlight mutual areas of interest and flag for discussion by GNSO/SSAC.  For example,some SSAC resources are public, which would allow one or two Councilors to volunteer as informal liaisons (e.g. keeping up with the lists & new publications, and reporting back to Council with any material topics).
  • Create an “SSAC Consultation” step as part of the start up activities of new PDPs.  Perhaps this could be merged with the existing SG/C comment/consultation steps?
  • No strong consensus to establish a formal liaison at this time, but keep this path open if future circumstances warrant the position.
Issues for the SCI - voting thresholds6/6 Avri Doria / Alan GreenbergMarika Konings 

COMPLETED - Following discussion on GNSO Council mailing list, it was agreed to not pursue this issue at this point in time.

Outstanding IGO/INGO PDP Recommendations26/614/4Thomas RickertMary WongIn June 2014, the NGPC wrote to the GNSO Council 'with an update on the ongoing work in response to the GNSO policy recommendations regarding Protection of IGO-INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs and the advice from the GAC in its Buenos Aires Communiqué addressing the same topic'. Furthermore the letter noted that 'the NGPC is considering available options to reconcile the differences at issue, including recommending that the ICANN Board reject the conflicting GNSO policy advice (pursuant to the procedure established in the Bylaws). However, before the NGPC recommends any course of action, the NGPC wanted to provide an update to the GNSO to highlight the concerns, and to give the GNSO an opportunity to consider modifying the elements of the approved policy recommendations in accordance with the procedure established in the GNSO Operating Procedures'.

Letter received from Cherine Chalaby (http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chalaby-to-robinson-15jan15-en.pdf) noting that the NGPC plans to talk further with the GAC and IGOs at ICANN 52 and would share any updates immediately following those meetings.

At ICANN55, representatives of the Red Cross met with the GNSO Council leadership to discuss possible next steps. The Red Cross representatives briefed the Council during the meeting on 14 April on the scope of the Red Cross’ continuing request for permanent protections for those of its national society and international movement identifiers that are not currently covered by the policy recommendations that have been adopted by the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board. Following this briefing, a draft letter has been prepared to be sent to the ICANN Board on this topic.

Collaboration with IETF23/717/12David Cake The Council discussed possible Council action regarding IETF proposed standard for .onion as a Special Use Domain Name: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dnsop-onion-tld/ (due 11 August 2015)

COMPLETED - James met with Warren and Paul from the IETF, IAB and Technical Liaison Group (TLG).  He circulated the notes captured during the conversation, along with a few points for follow-up to the Council mailing list.

PPSAI21/114/4 Mary Wong 

COMPLETED - Board documentation has been submitted. Call for volunteers for IRT will be circulated following approval of the recommendations by the ICANN Board.

  • Staff to proceed with submission of required documentation to the ICANN Board for Board action following close of public comment period on the Final Report on 16 March 2016.
  • ICANN Staff to issue a call for volunteers for the Implementation Review Team, to be circulated at a minimum to the members of PPSAI PDP Working Group following approval of the recommendations by the ICANN Board.
GNSO Review Feasibility & Prioritisation Analysis9/314/4Wolf-Ulrich KnobenMarika Konings 

COMPLETED - Transmittal letter has been submitted to the OEC.

Harassment of participants at ICANN meetings10/314/4Jennifer Gore, Marilia Maciel, Stefania Milan, Ed Morris, David CakeMary Wong COMPLETED - Letter has been submitted to Akram.
Review of the GAC Communique10/314/4Susan Kawaguchi, Rubens Kuhl, Jennifer GoreMarika Konings COMPLETED - Transmittal letter has been sent to the ICANN Board & GAC.
AoC Review Schedule10/314/4James Bladel  

COMPLETED - no consensus as to what actions, if any, should be taken at this time. In the absence of unified and formal guidance from the Community, the reviews will proceed as scheduled. Any proposals to change the timing or scope would require engagement with the Board, and also likely NTIA. GNSO to continue to raise any remaining concerns in relevant sessions in Helsinki.

  • No labels
For comments, suggestions, or technical support concerning this space, please email: ICANN Policy Department
© 2015 Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers