You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 19 Next »

The CCWG-Accountability engaged two law firms to advise and counsel on their work. At the time of engagement, the CCWG-Accountability created a Legal Subteam to coordinate the work of the firms. 

However, following the release of the Initial Draft Report in May 2015, the Legal Subteam was disbanded and the relationship with the law firms was redesigned: the CCWG-Accountability Chairs, not the Legal Subteam, would have direct contact with the firms and certify requests from the group. This new method of engagement allows for more direct consultation between the leadership and the law firms while at the same time allowing for better staff-supported costs tracking. 

 

Q#

Question / RequestWhoDateStatusResponse
9Counsel to provide a redline of the Board recall chapter (5B.4) for WP1. Attendance on WP1 call as well.Jordan Carter Certified request with counsel – completeCommunity Power 5.6- Recalling ICANN Board.pdf
8

"As discussed we will be sending our next draft documents for your review on Friday the 24th so you will then have the weekend to read and suggest edits, hopefully sending the drafts back to us on the 27th before the freeze on the 28th."

Leon Sanchez Certified request with counsel 
7

Counsel to provide a short response (in the form of bullet points rather than a memo) to the ARIN legal assessment.

 

Co-Chairs  Certified request with counsel – complete 
Following the release of the Initial Draft Report in May 2015, the Legal Subteam was disbanded and the relationship with the law firms was redesigned: the CCWG-Accountability Chairs, not the Legal Subteam, would have direct contact with the firms and certify requests from the group. This new method of engagement allows for more direct consultation between the leadership and the law firms while at the same time allowing for better staff-supported costs tracking. 
6Governance Models & Community Powers CHART (link is to google doc)Legal Sub-Team  Sent to legal advisors during legal sub-team call of 15 April 
5(Request to review and respond to the) questions set forth below from Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva dated April 7.Pedro Ivo Ferraz da Silva  Sent to legal advisors (agreed relevant WS1) 
4Question from Eberhard Lisse "what gives the US government the right to control the root?"  The legal sub-group did not see the direct linkage between the question and Work stream 1 or accountability per se.    Decision made legal sub-team call 8 April 2015.Eberhard Lisse  Question not sent to the legal advisors.  
3(Request for advice and response regarding the) memo and proposed bylaw changes provided by ARIN's counsel for the CCWG's consideration.Legal sub-team  Sent to legal advisorsARIN Response Memo
2(Request to review and respond to the)  comments of Samantha Eisner on the Adler & Colvin March 27 memo.Samantha Eisner  Sent to legal advisors (default) 
1(Request to review and respond to the)  comments of Samantha Eisner on the Sidley Austin March 27 memo.Samantha Eisner   Sent to legal advisors (default) 
      
      
      
      
      
 Revised memo on the use of Unincorporated Associations in ICANN governance   Revised memo on unincorporated associations
 Legal counsel's comments on the XPLANE presentation, CCWG call of 29 April   Comments to the 1XPL CCWG Illustrated Concepts 
 red line comment on CCWG draft proposal V9 (April 29, 2015)   Legal Counsel comment of CCWG draft proposal
 Update to Annex B-7 of the document of April 23, 2015   Update - Legal Assessment: Executive Summary, Summary Chart and Revised Governance Chart
     Nominating Committee: Legal Role and Status 
 Request on 25 April to respond to Avri Doria's questions: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000379.html. Clarification here.Greg Shatan  
 Request on 24 April to respond to James Gannon question: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000376.htmlLeon Sanchez  
 Request on 23 April for Member/Designator Model FAQs: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000367.htmlLeon Sanchez

(tick) Received on  (see email here)

Response to Questions Re: Unincorporated Associations 
 

Request on 23 April to review the chart of community powers: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000356.html

Leon Sanchez(tick) Received on (see email here)

Overview of Community Powers. Comments and suggested edits in Track Changes

 REQUESTED? Responses to questions from Malcolm Hutty (tick) Received on (see email here)Sidley-Adler - Memo (IRP Template Response).pdf
(info) This is a follow-up to request #An executive summary of the information provided in the Memorandum and Governance Chart provided on April 20, 2015.(question) Requested by ?(tick) Received on (see email here )Legal Assessment: Executive Summary, Summary Chart and Revised Governance Chart 
 Request on 21 April to answer questions from Chris Disspain: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000331.htmlLeon Sanchez(tick) Received on   (see email here)Answers provided in email
 Compiled list of legal questions on 17 April: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000299.htmlLeon Sanchez   
 Request on 17 April to respond to Edward Morris' question on OFAC licensing: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000298.htmlLeon Sanchez   
 Request on 16 April for response on IRP question: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000285.htmlLeon Sanchez(tick) Received on   (see email here)Answers provided in email 
 Request on 16 April for responses to questions: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000269.htmlLeon Sanchez   
 Request on 16 April to review WP2 templates: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000268.html. Follow up on 17 April: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000300.htmlLeon Sanchez(tick) Received on  (see email here)

21April Legal Assessment_ Proposed Accountability Mechanisms Preliminary Respons....pdf

 Request for attendance on WP1 Meeting #10 (15 April): http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000238.htmlJordan Carter 

Sidley attendees:

Adler attendees:

 Request on 15 April to review Robin's table: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000240.htmlLeon Sanchez(tick) Received on  (see email here)Legal Assessment_ Governance Chart.pdf
 Request for attendance during High Intensity meetings: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000236.html. Clarification here. Leon Sanchez 

Sidley attendees:

Adler attendees:

 Request for pre-meeting in advance of WP1 Meeting #9 (13 April): http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000189.htmlGreg Shatan   
 Request for attendance on WP1 Meeting #10 (15 April): http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000187.htmlGreg Shatan(error) Request cancelled: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000213.html

Sidley attendees:

Adler attendees:

4Request submitted on 9 April for answers to questions by Pedro Ivo Da Silva: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000172.htmlGreg Shatan   
 Request for attendance on CCWG ACCT Meeting # 22 (14 April) to provide a presentation on structures and mechanisms available to the CCWG-Accountability: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000170.html. Clarification from counsel here, and response here.Greg Shatan(tick) Received

Sidley attendees:

Adler attendees:

Presentation delivered on the call: ICANN CCWG - Presentation Slides.pdf

 Request submitted on 8 April to respond to Samantha Eisner's questions: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000166.htmlGreg Shatan   
 Request submitted on 8 April for review and comments on the ARIN memorandum: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000164.htmlGreg Shatan(tick) Received on  (see email here)ARIN Response Memo
(info) This is a follow-up to request #4Updated analysis of the viability of various accountability mechanisms and powers under consideration by CCWG-Accountability. (question) Requested by Robin Gross?
(tick) Received on  (see email here)Updated Sidley Austin, Adler & Colvin Joint Preliminary Analysis
4Request submitted on 7 April for review of WP1 document: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000155.htmlGreg Shatan(tick) Received on  (see email here) Sidley Austin, Adler & Colvin Joint Preliminary Analysis
Following a Legal Subteam call, the group agreed on a coordination process for the two firms: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000131.html.
3Request for attendance on CCWG ACCT Meeting # 20 (31 March) to provide overview of preliminary responses: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-March/000072.htmlLeon Sanchez(tick) Received on  (see email here from Sidley and here from Adler)

Sidley attendees: Michael Clark; Joshua Hofheimer;

Adler attendees: Stephanie Petit; Emily Chan; Rosemary Fei.

Process clarification to ensure that all questions directed to legal counsel come from the Legal Subteam: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-March/000064.html.
2Request submitted on 24 March to Adler Colvin for preliminary response to questions: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-March/000054.html. Updated request submitted on 4 April: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-April/000142.html. Leon Sanchez(tick) Received on  (see email here)Adler Colvin Preliminary Responses (00663636xA3536).pdf

1

Request submitted on 24 March to Sidley Austin for preliminary response to questions: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/ccwg-accountability5/2015-March/000055.html. Leon Sanchez(tick) Received on    (see email here)  Sidley Preliminary Draft Responses to CCWG Legal Sub-team Questionnaire.pdf

 

 

  • No labels