Attendees: Guru Acharya: Matthew Shears; Jaap Akkerhuis: Allan MacGillivray: Graeme Bunton 

Apologies: James Gannon 

 

Google Doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRiXP9-nxM-h8FgJ_FyM962EwdjnRESrDT2jOtlRZZ0/edit?usp=sharing

Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-L+Transition+Plan

 

Notes: 

Scale back ambitions for the time-being and focus on current transition plan plan. 

 

Suggestion to meet Friday's deadline is to: 

  • use the template and evolve it based on the current transition plan;
  • elaborate on the high-level principles; and 
  • look at other dependencies with DTs (and other communities)
  • elaborate a set of recommendations for how the plan should evolve post transition 

 

Action (Matthew): Capture David's comments on DT-L. Also will want to run this template by him tomorrow. 

 

Dependencies with other DTs

DT-O (Budget) will not be addressing budget costs for transition plan. 

 

DT-M (Escalation): one of their escalation steps may at some point be a RFP or separation, but the detail is not being addressed. 

Currently the escalation step relating to RFP says '6. Initiate RFP or [Process mechanism yet to be defined] [Pending Legal Advice & Fundamental Bylaw definition in CCWG]'

--> DT-L could recommend a process for transition 

Action (Allan): draft recommendations for escalation related aspects (will circulate on mailing list)

 

DT-N (Periodic Review) could also be related. 

 

Things to note/edit in the document

- Scaling back from original plan to write a new transition plan, and instead focusing on the current transition plan and additions to it

- Have not received C.7.2 but submitted a DIDP request for it (submitted an received two other DIDP requests)

 

Action (Jaap): draft text and recommendations for KSK rollover. 

Action (Guru): go over initial concerns (6 point in an email about the trasition plan) and see if addressed in draft. 

 

Analysis of Transition Plan

'Document Structure' needs to refer to new proposal structure

Transition Actions

'Deliverables not requiring transition' -- note the DIDP request for C.7.2

 

At best, we'll have a framework for a transition. What DT-L produces can be taken to another level at a later point. 

 

Deadline for edits to document in 24h. Aim for 13:00 UTC on 9 April. This way, Matthew will send text to David for review/feedback. 

Recordings

The MP3 recording is available here: Track1-ID188539281.mp3

The Adobe Connect recording is available here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p5wdqe94cfi/

 

*There was no transcript for this call. 

Chat Transcript

Grace Abuhamad:Hi all -- the link to the DT-L Google Doc is here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QRiXP9-nxM-h8FgJ_FyM962EwdjnRESrDT2jOtlRZZ0/edit?usp=sharing

  Jaap Akkerhuis (SSAC):Hi all

  Allan MacGillivray:Hello to everyone from a still cold canad a.

  Graeme Bunton:Hey All

  Graeme Bunton:Agreed, Matthew

  Allan MacGillivray:Matthew - that seems very reasonable.

  Graeme Bunton:Calculating costs sounds nearly impossible

  Grace Abuhamad:Yes @Graeme. I think the idea would be to make a high-level recommendation that this needs to be considered in new plan for example

  Grace Abuhamad:The document is also posted on the Wiki

  Grace Abuhamad:Wiki page: https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocwgdtstwrdshp/DT-L+Transition+Plan

  Graeme Bunton:not from me

  Guru Acharya:Makes sense. Agree with plan.

  Grace Abuhamad:Unsynced the document

  Marika Konings:Currently the escalation step relating to RFP says '6. Initiate RFP or [Process mechanism yet to be defined] [Pending Legal Advice & Fundamental Bylaw definition in CCWG]'

  Marika Konings:agree with Allan

  Guru Acharya:IPR related issues

  Guru Acharya:Is there a DT working on it?

  Guru Acharya:Transition of IPR will be dealt with them or us?

  Grace Abuhamad:Jaap -- would you like to draft text/recommendations related to KSK rollover?

  Allan MacGillivray:I would feel better were Jaap to draft the KSK text.

  Guru Acharya:OK. I will try to do that.

  Grace Abuhamad:Thanks @ Guru

  Jaap Akkerhuis (SSAC):I will see what I can do, I'm behind with other work as well. It will be short :-)

  Graeme Bunton:Not from me

  Allan MacGillivray:I'm good. Let's get to work.  Good call Matthew.

  Guru Acharya:Bye

  Jaap Akkerhuis (SSAC):By!

  • No labels