You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 16 Next »

Close
Date
Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s) and
RALO(s)

Call for
Comments
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote
Announcement 
Vote OpenVote 
Reminder
Vote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number
15.10.2012Trademark Clearinghouse Documents

In Progress

Avri Doria
(NARALO) 
16.11.201231.10.201202.11.201203.11.201206.11.201207.11.2012
12:00 UTC 
07.11.2012Karen Lentz
karen.lentz@icann.org 
TBC
Comment/Reply Periods (*)Important Information Links
Comment Open:24 September 2012
Comment Close:15 October 2012
Close Time (UTC):23:59 UTCPublic Comment Announcement
Reply Open:16 October 2012To Submit Your Comments (Forum)
Reply Close:7 November 2012View Comments Submitted
Close Time (UTC):23:59 UTCReport of Public Comments
Brief Overview
Originating Organization:ICANN Staff
Categories/Tags:Top-Level Domains
Purpose (Brief):

The Trademark Clearinghouse facilitates the protection of trademark rights during the initial allocation and registration periods for domain names in new generic top level domains (new gTLDs). Starting with the first round expected to be coming online late in 2013, all new gTLD registries will be required to use Clearinghouse data to ensure that a set of mandatory trademark rights protection mechanisms are applied to all new domain registrations occurring in at least the first 90 days of domain registration.

The documents for comment present the development work done on these Clearinghouse procedures and are now provided for community review and comment. Two explanatory memoranda are posted for a 45-day public comment period:

  1. Implementing Matching Rules [PDF, 194 KB]
  2. Implementing Proof of Use Verification [PDF, 176 KB]
Current Status:These memos provide Trademark Clearinghouse implementation details as currently developed.
Next Steps:Comments will be summarized and analyzed, and revisions to the relevant procedures may be considered based on the feedback received.
Staff Contact:Karen LentzEmail:karen.lentz@icann.org
Detailed Information
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose

The Trademark Clearinghouse facilitates the protection of trademark rights during the initial allocation and registration periods for domain names in new generic top level domains (new gTLDs). Starting with the first round expected to be coming online late in 2013, all new gTLD registries will be required to use Clearinghouse data to ensure that a set of mandatory trademark rights protection mechanisms are applied to all new domain registrations occurring in at least the first 90 days of domain registration.

The documents for comment describe the development work done on Clearinghouse procedures and are now provided for community review and comment.
Two explanatory memoranda are posted for a 45-day public comment period:

  1. Implementing Matching Rules [PDF, 194 KB]
  2. Implementing Proof of Use Verification [PDF, 176 KB]
Section II: Background

With the launch of the New generic Top-Level Domain (New gTLD) Program, Internet users will see many new gTLDs enter the domain name system. Operators of new gTLDs will be responsible for implementing certain rights protection mechanisms, supported by the Trademark Clearinghouse.

The Trademark Clearinghouse is one of several important enhanced rights protection mechanisms that have been built into the new gTLD program. The Trademark Clearinghouse will accept and authenticate rights information, and will support both trademark claims and sunrise services, required in all new gTLDs. The Clearinghouse is expected to play an important role in the launch of the New gTLD Program and in ensuring ongoing protection of trademark rights.

Section III: Document and Resource Links
http://newgtlds.icann.org/en/about/trademark-clearinghouse
Section IV: Additional Information
 

(*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis, reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period lapses.

FINAL DRAFT

In August 2012 the Registry Stakeholder Group filed a DIDP requesting all documents relating to

  1. any claims alleging ownership of intellectual property rights made by any bidder or bidders [for Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH)] responding to the RFI, including but not limited to claims of copyright in data or compilations of data,  patents, trademarks or trade secrets; and
  2. any analysis regarding validity of these claims.

In September 2012 ICANN responded that:

Regarding this item, to the extent that bidders made claims of ownership of intellectual property rights associated with the proposed operation of the Trademark Clearinghouse, those materials are subject to the same conditions of non-­disclosure identified in conjunction with Documents on cost and financial models regarding the operation of TMCH. Regarding claims of ownership of intellectual property rights arising out of the operation of TMCH are being negotiated and will be published in the finalized agreement later.

The ALAC wishes to request further information on the following:

  • Intellectual property rights affect or impact ICANN's decision and selection of TMCH providers. Legally, except trade secrets, intellectual property rights, including Patents, Copyright, Trademarks, should be publicly disclosed in due course either for subsistence or exercise. Will intellectual property rights that affect or impact ICANN's decision or selection, be disclosed to the community in due course, or will they be allowed to remain secret?
  • Will ICANN (and its community) be appropriately licensed on royalty-free or RAND (reasonable-and-non-discriminatory) basis by the relevant intellectual property owners?
  • Is ICANN developing necessary intellectual property policy for decision-making or contract negotiation?

The ALAC further advises that ICANN needs to implement a thoughtful and comprehensive intellectual property policy in which the global public interest is properly secured. In this regard, the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) intellectual property policy sets a good example.

FIRST DRAFT

The first draft was developed on the New gTLD WG mailing list

  • No labels