Versions Compared

Old Version 42

changes.mady.by.user Ariel Liang

Saved on

compared with

New Version 43

changes.mady.by.user Ariel Liang

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Deck of Cards
idURS Proposals
Card
labelPresentation Order & Schedule

I. Suggested Operational Fix

Order No.ProponentTopicDeferred to Phase 2?FileTentative Presentation DateStatus
1Kristine Dorrain

B. NOTICE

3. Other topics


URS-Proposal-1.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

2Maxim Alzoba

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation


URS-Proposal-2.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

3Zak Muscovitch

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation


URS-Proposal-3.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

4George Kirikos

F. REMEDIES

4. Other topics


URS-Proposal-4.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

Order No.

ProponentTopic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table)Deferred to Phase 2?FileTentative Presentation Date
5George Kirikos

A. THE COMPLAINT

3. Limited filing period

Yes

URS-Proposal-5.pdf



6Claudio DiGangi

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics


URS-Proposal-6.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

7George Kirikos

B. NOTICE

1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

Yes

URS-Proposal-7.pdf



8George Kirikos

C. RESPONSE

1. Duration of response period

Yes

URS-Proposal-8.pdf



9David McAuley

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review


URS-Proposal-9.pdf

 

Status
colourGreen
titlePresentation Completed

10Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review


URS-Proposal-10.pdf

 


11Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

3. Response fee


URS-Proposal-11.pdf

 


12George Kirikos

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

Yes

URS-Proposal-12.pdf



13Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies


URS-Proposal-13.pdf

 


14Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies


URS-Proposal-14.pdf

 


15Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies


URS-Proposal-15.pdf

 


16Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

2. Duration of suspension period


URS-Proposal-16.pdf

 


17Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of suspension period


URS-Proposal-17.pdf

 


18George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes

URS-Proposal-18.pdf



19George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes

URS-Proposal-19.pdf



20George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

Yes

URS-Proposal-20.pdf



21Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model


URS-Proposal-21.pdf

 


22Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model


URS-Proposal-22.pdf

 


23George Kirikos

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

Yes

URS-Proposal-23.pdf



24George Kirikos

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination


URS-Proposal-24.pdf

 


25Zak Muscovitch

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination


URS-Proposal-25.pdf

 


26Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)


URS-Proposal-26.pdf

 


27Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)


URS-Proposal-27.pdf

 


28Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

2. Conflict of interest


URS-Proposal-28.pdf

 


29George Kirikos

M. URS PROVIDERS

(no applicable subheading at present)

Yes

URS-Proposal-29.pdf



30George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

Yes

URS-Proposal-30.pdf



31David McAuley

(no applicable subheading at present)


URS-Proposal-31.pdf

 


III. Other 

Order No.ProponentTopicDeferred to Phase 2?
FileTentative Presentation Date
32George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP


URS-Proposal-32.pdf

 


33George Kirikos(no applicable subheading at present)Yes

URS-Proposal-33.pdf





Card
labelQuick Download

Click the files below to quickly download URS Proposals. You may click "Download All" at the bottom to mass download all URS Proposals.

Attachments
oldfalse
sortBycreateddate

...