The following two Google Docs summarize the RPM WG's deliberations on the URS Proposals submitted by Sub Teams and Individual WG members. These two Google Docs also note the approach of incorporating these proposals in the Initial Report. 

Sub Team Proposals 

Individual Proposals


WG Revision to the URS Sub Team Proposals for inclusion in the Initial Report (version 12 December 2019, with redline edits): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jlsM6yl3A9ssPdHymjZwoSQXsncsl8h_9oOE1vFYm9o/edit?usp=sharing


Super Consolidated URS Proposals from Sub Teams (latest version 13 Sep 2018): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jxx9qmIBV9U-LjBM8j73f1X_UbzoyBogWz2phSMZ9lM/edit?usp=sharing



Download the consolidated URS Proposals submitted by individual working group members below:

Consolidated URS Proposals from Individual WG Members.pdf

Slides including survey results of all URS Individual Proposals


I. Suggested Operational Fix

Order No.ProponentTopicFilePresentation DateStatusUpdated Proposal
1Kristine Dorrain

B. NOTICE

3. Other topics

 


2Maxim Alzoba

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation

 


3Zak Muscovitch

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of Suspension Period

3. Review of Implementation

 


4George Kirikos

F. REMEDIES

4. Other topics

 


II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

Order No.

ProponentTopic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table)FileTentative Presentation DateStatusUpdated Proposal
5George Kirikos

A. THE COMPLAINT

3. Limited filing period

 


6Claudio DiGangi

A. THE COMPLAINT

8. Other topics

 

Supplemental Information
7George Kirikos

B. NOTICE

1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

 


8George Kirikos

C. RESPONSE

1. Duration of response period

 


9David McAuley

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review

 

#36 - merging #9 and #10

URS-Proposal-36.pdf

10Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review

 

36David McAuley & Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

1. Duration of response period

==

G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

2. De novo review

URS-Proposal-36.pdf

 

11Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

C. RESPONSE

3. Response fee

 


12George Kirikos

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

 

Revised version sent on 16 Oct 2018

URS-Proposal-35.pdf

35George Kirikos

D. STANDARD OF PROOF

1. General

URS-Proposal-35.pdf

 


13Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

 


14Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

n/a

Can be merged

15Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

 

16Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

F. REMEDIES

1. Scope of remedies

2. Duration of suspension period

 

Can be merged

17Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

F. REMEDIES

2. Duration of suspension period

n/a

18George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

 


19George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

 


20George Kirikos

G. APPEAL

1. Appeals process

 


21Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

n/a


Can be merged
22Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

 

23George Kirikos

I. COST

1. Cost allocation model

 


24George Kirikos

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

 

#34 - merging #24 & #25

URS-Proposal-34.pdf

25Zak Muscovitch

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

 

34George Kirikos & Zak Muscovitch

J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination

 

26Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)

 


27Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)

 


28Zak Muscovitch

M. URS PROVIERS

2. Conflict of interest

 


29George Kirikos

M. URS PROVIDERS

(no applicable subheading at present)

 


30George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

 


31David McAuley

(no applicable subheading at present)

 


III. Other 

Order No.ProponentTopicFileTentative Presentation DateStatusUpdated Proposal
32George Kirikos

N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP

 


33George Kirikos(no applicable subheading at present)

 



Co-Chairs Proposed Procedures for URS Policy and Operational Recommendations-28 August 2018.pdf