Page History
...
| Info |
|---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS For the substance of the meeting, we will begin our review of CC2 feedback, specifically looking at the following questions: 3.1.1 - Do you think that the policy recommendations (Recommendations 2, 3, 6, and 20) require any modifications? If so, what would you suggest? 3.1.2 - Do you believe that those recommendations (which led to the establishment of the String Confusion, Legal Rights, Limited Public Interest, and Community Objections grounds) were implemented effectively and in the spirit of the original policy recommendations? If no, please provide examples. 3.1.3 - Do you believe there were any issues with standing requirements as defined in the Applicant Guidebook (AGB), or as carried out by the providers? Please explain. 3.1.4 - Do you believe there is evidence of decisions made by objection dispute panels that were inconsistent with other similar objections, the original policy recommendations, and/or the AGB? Please explain. 3.1.5 - Are you aware of any instances where any party or parties attempted to ‘game’ the Objection procedures in the 2012 round? If so, please provide examples and any evidence you may have available. Please take a moment prior to the meeting to review the responses to these questions on the wiki https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=63155738[community.icann.org] Some of these responses are quite substantial so we hope avoid having to read them verbatim in during the call in favor of discussion of themes derived from the responses.
|
| Info | ||
|---|---|---|
| ||
Mp3 AC Recording AC Chat Transcript |
...
