Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Security and Stability: Were the proper questions asked to minimize the risk to the DNS and ensure that applicants will be able to meet their obligations in the registry agreement? Should there be non-scored questions and if so, how should they be presented? Were the proper criteria established to avoid causing technical instability? Is the impact to the DNS from new gTLDs fully understood?
  • Applicant Reviews: Technical/Operational and Financial: Were Financial and Technical criteria designed properly to allow applicants to demonstrate their capabilities while allowing evaluators to validate their capabilities? How can the criteria be streamlined and made clearer? 
  • Name collisions: How should name collisions be incorporated into future new gTLD rounds? What measures may be needed to manage risks for 2012-round gTLDs beyond their 2 year anniversary of delegation, or gTLDs delegated prior to the 2012 round?

 

Work Track Four Issue Areas Working Document: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Axd1hmt6-qSaCGxC9UbTqBM4gP7aVxySOH3fMZ1W5hE/edit?usp=sharing

Work Track Four Reading List: Work Track 4 Reading List for 31 May 2017.docx