Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Maureen Hilyard is the ccNSO Liaison for 2013-2014.


ccNSO Liaison Report to ALAC - FOIWG Meeting Feb 6

 

 

Of particular interest to the ALAC was the discussion about the ALAC statement on the Revocation report

 

 

The WG acknowledged the ALAC's positive response to  the report. There were four areas that were highlighted for discussion by the WG.

 

 

  1. ALAC's suggestion for the FOIWG to  clarify  the type of "independent body" (in 4.3.7.3.) that would qualify for the appeals  process in the case of revocation 
    1. The WG understands this to be an implementation-operational detail that should be dealt with in accordance with national laws, involving local stakeholders and the rights expressed within the existing ccTLD Registry (refer 2.2.1), and therefore beyond the scope of the WG.
  2. ALAC's request that IANA maintain reports on cases of re-delegation etc .
    1. Any IANA functions  contract implementation  issues or procedures relating to  this  contract, are also outside of the scope of the WG (refer Section A. Introduction and Objective)
  3. The reference in the ALAC Statement recommending factoring the GAC Principles  into guidelines relating to situations relating to revocation where the IANA operator is required to work with local governments to ensure that the ccTLD continues to operate efficiently,  until a replacement manager takes over. 
    1. Although GAC principles are not binding on managers, the FOIWG executive is looking into further clarification of this area.
  4. ALAC noted concern about whether the IANA operator is empowered to act where there is a case for revocation from a local government, backed by local law, but where there are no operational or behavioural issues on the part of the incumbent ccTLD operator. 
    1. This scenario is beyond the scope of the WG. This is an internal issue and there is no policy statement in RFC1591 relating to this situation, RFC 1591 states " the IANA tries to have any contending parties reach agreement among themselves, and generally takes no action to change things unless all the contending parties agree; only in cases where the designated manager has substantially misbehave would the IANA step in." (refer to 2.1.1) 


ccNSO Report to the ALAC - 29 January 2014 1500UTC

 1) Meeting of the ALAC-ccNSO Coordination WG meeting on 13 January 2014

...