Page History
...
Active: Smartsheets Version
Date |
---|
Target Date
Responsible Council Member (if applicable)
Responsible Staff member (if applicable)
Additional Notes
Status / Action Item
Singapore Meeting Planning
Archive: Smartsheets Version
Date | File |
---|---|
2021-2022 | TBD |
2020-2021 | GNSO_Council_Action_Items_2020_2021.pdf |
Volker Greimann / Jonathan Robinson
Please participate in the meeting survey (https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/CYDWXFN) to provide your input for the next meeting.
Consider role of Council in possible changes to Tuesday format for SG meetings with the ICANN Board.
CWG To Develop an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions
.
.
The NomCom would appreciate receiving a skill set summarizing the GNSO Council's expectations for the 2 positions on the Council the 2015 NomCom is recruiting for. Ideally, the NomCom would need to receive feedback by 19 November in order to include it in the materials that will be used to announce the next round.
COMPLETED - liaisons were confirmed during the last meeting and different groups have been informed.
Confirm new liaisons for GNSO efforts that are in need of new liaisons due to stepping down of a number of Council members (see note to the GNSO Council mailing list)
The timing of GAC Advice and how that fits into the policy making cycle as current cycle is problematic as GAC advice is developed in parallel to policy making efforts going on as well as during discussions at ICANN meetings. GAC Advice is often a mixture of policy and implementation, which should be reviewed and parsed by the GNSO since otherwise, it draws the Board into implementation. Typically, the GNSO never responds to the GAC Advice. A possible approach is for the community (led by the Council) to separate GAC Advice into issues of policy and implementation and then to come up with a GNSO response. Consideration of this approach could be a topic for discussion at the first GNSO Council meeting after an ICANN meeting. Policy advice could be further broken down into “in scope” and “out of scope” topics for ICANN policy and thereafter, what, if anything, the GNSO plans to undertake to address policy topics identified. This approach will permit the Board to then go back to the GAC to indicate what policy issues are being worked on. Dealing with the communiqué is a suggested topic for discussion in the joint GAC-GNSO meeting during ICANN 52. The Council had an initial exchange of views on this topic during its meeting on 13/11.