Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Action Items:   EN & ES          

Recording: EN, ES, PT, FR FR

AC Chat Transcript:   EN/ES

Transcription: EN, ESPT, FR FR

...

Dial Out Participants:

ES:   Wladimir Davalos, Javier Rua-Jovet, Sergio Salinas Porto, Maritza Aguero, Adrian Carballo, Humberto Carrasco, Ricardo Holmquist, Antonio Medina Gomez, Alberto Soto, Gilberto Lara, Leon Sanchez, Lilian De Luque, Lito Ibarra, Olga Cavalli, Harold Arcos, Aida Noblia, Alfredo Lopez

EN: Bartlett Morgan, Dev Anand Teelucksingh

FR:  

PT: 

Apologies:Vanda Scartezini Vanda Scartezini, Maureen Hilyard, Heidi Ullrich (staff), Sylvia Herlein

Staff: Heidi Ullrich, Silvia Vivanco, Claudia Ruiz

Interpreters: 

ES:  Veronica and Paula 

PT:  Bettina and Esperanza 

FR:  Claire

Call Management: Claudia Ruiz

...

AGENDA 

...

ES 

  1. Bienvenida - Humberto Carrasco (1 minuto).
  2. Aprobación de la Agenda - Maritza Agüero (2 minutos).Propuesta General de Implementación de la Revisión de At-Large. Presentacion a cargo de Alan Greenberg, presentacion de Cheryl Langdon-Orr  y Maureen Hilyard (30 minutos)
  3. Revisión de las consultas públicas del ALAC. Presentación a cargo de Bartlett MorganAlberto SotoALAC Member (15 minutos).
  4. SeePolicy Advice Development Page
  5. See : ICANN Public Comment page

    Statements approved by the ALAC

        • Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM

          During ICANN62, the ALAC revised, ratified and resubmitted their Statement. The ALAC supported the proposition, provided it offers the proceeds to nonprofit organizations that serve the public interest. The ALAC offered three suggestions to that end: (1) ICANN should permit the release of O.com and allow Verisign to conduct a third-party auction, (2) Third-party auction service providers should screen candidates for auction, and (3) Verisign should forfeit the auction’s proceeds and renewals to non-profit entity.
        • Draft Final Report of the RSSAC2 Review
          The ALAC is responsible for representing the interests of Internet end users within ICANN, and there are few parts of the Internet as critical as the Root Server System. The ALAC commented specifically on recommendations 1, 2 and 5 of the RSSAC2 Review, related to 1) RSSAC membership criteria, the 2) RSSAC charter and 3) engaging more effectively with ICANN.

    Statements in process - DraftComment or Vote

    Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process 
    The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.

    Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews 
    Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation. 

    Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews  
    The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.

    Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata 
    The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset. 

    Statements in process - DraftingComment or Vote

    Drafting

    Draft

     ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model 

    Requested

     Requested ASAP
    Penholder(s):

    TBC

     TBC

    Comment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.

    Requested ASAP Note

    7 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
    Penholder(s):  Holly Raiche, Jonathan Zuck, Alan Greenberg

  6. Vote Draft Community Travel Support Guidelines  
    Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

  7. Draft Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata  
    Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

  8. Comment Draft Proposal of the New Fellowship Program Approach 
    Penholder(s): Maureen Hilyard

  9. Comment Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews  
    Penholder(s): Cheryl Langdon-OrrSebastien BacholletDaniel Khauka NanghakaVanda Scartezini

  10. Draft Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews  
    Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

  11. Draft 

    Drafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4)  
    Penholder(s):  Jonathan Zuck

    Draft Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process 

    Drafting Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains  
    Penholder(s):

     Alan Greenberg

     Satish Babu

    Drafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0  
    Penholder(s): TBC

    Statements that seem to be stalled

    • None 
      • None

    Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements

    New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions

    The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations  

    Upcoming Public Comment Requests

    July

    August

      • Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Work Track 5 – Geographic Names at the Top-Level)
      • Proposal for Devanagari Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Proposal for Gurumukhi Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team – Final Report
      • New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) – Initial Report
      • Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
      • Proposal for Gujarati Script Root Zone Label
      • Proposals for Bengali, Malayalam, and Tamil Scripts Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)

    August

      • Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations
      • Proposal for Sinhala Script Root Zone Label
      • Proposal for Telugu Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Proposal for Kannada Script Root Zone Label
      • Generation Rules (LGR)

      • Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations
    Temas actuales de la Junta Directiva del ICANN. Presentación a cargo de Lito Ibarra, Miembro de la Junta Directiva de ICANN (10 minutos).

    September

      • Registration Directory Service Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) Draft Report
      • Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
      • Recommendations on the Technical Use of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
      • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report

  12. Especificación Temporaria para los datos de registración de gTLD. Presentación a cargo de León Sánchez, Miembro de la Junta Directiva de ICANN (15 20 minutos).
  13. Procedimientos posteriores de nuevos gTLD - Actualización sobre los temas del Grupo de Gobernanzay seguimiento de trabajo sobre el uso de nombres geográficos en el nivel superior (WT5). Presentación a cargo de Sergio Salinas Porto (10 minutos)de Javier Rúa (ALAC Member) - 15 minutos.
  14. Otros temas de interés -  (5 10  minutos).Daniel Fink - Anuncio del ICANN 62 LAC Readout - 19 de Julio a las 18:00 UTC.

ENGLISH EN TO BE UPDATEDENGLISH EN 

  1. Welcome  - Humberto Carrasco (1 minute).
  2. Agenda Aproval - Maritza Aguero (2 minutes).
  3. At-Large Review and ImplementationPresentation by Alan Greenberg, presentation by Cheryl Langdon-Orr  and Maureen Hilyard (30 minutes).
  4. ALAC Public Consultations -  Bartlett MorganAlberto Soto, ALAC member (15 minutes).
  5. SeePolicy Advice Development Page
  6. See : ICANN Public Comment page

    Statements approved by the ALAC

        • Release for Registration one .COM Domain Name with a Single-Character Label: O.COM

          During ICANN62, the ALAC revised, ratified and resubmitted their Statement. The ALAC supported the proposition, provided it offers the proceeds to nonprofit organizations that serve the public interest. The ALAC offered three suggestions to that end: (1) ICANN should permit the release of O.com and allow Verisign to conduct a third-party auction, (2) Third-party auction service providers should screen candidates for auction, and (3) Verisign should forfeit the auction’s proceeds and renewals to non-profit entity.
        • Draft Final Report of the RSSAC2 Review
          The ALAC is responsible for representing the interests of Internet end users within ICANN, and there are few parts of the Internet as critical as the Root Server System. The ALAC commented specifically on recommendations 1, 2 and 5 of the RSSAC2 Review, related to 1) RSSAC membership criteria, the 2) RSSAC charter and 3) engaging more effectively with ICANN.

    Statements in process - DraftComment or Vote

    Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process 
    The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.

    Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews 
    Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation. 

    Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews  
    The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.

    Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata 
    The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset. 

    Statements in process - DraftingComment or Vote

    Drafting

    Draft

     ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model 

    Requested

     Requested ASAP
    Penholder(s):

    TBC

     TBC

    Comment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.

    Requested ASAP Note

    7 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
    Penholder(s):  Holly Raiche, Jonathan Zuck, Alan Greenberg

  7. Vote Draft Community Travel Support Guidelines  
    Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

  8. Draft Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata  
    Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

  9. Comment Draft Proposal of the New Fellowship Program Approach 
    Penholder(s): Maureen Hilyard

  10. Comment Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews  
    Penholder(s): Cheryl Langdon-OrrSebastien BacholletDaniel Khauka NanghakaVanda Scartezini

  11. Draft Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews  
    Penholder(s): Alan Greenberg

  12. Draft 

    Drafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4)  
    Penholder(s):  Jonathan Zuck

    Draft Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process 

    Drafting Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains  
    Penholder(s):

     Alan Greenberg

     Satish Babu

    Drafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0  
    Penholder(s): TBC

    Statements that seem to be stalled

    • None 
      • None

    Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements

    New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions

    The Independent Review Process Implementation Oversight Team (IRP-IOT) Draft Recommendations  

    Upcoming Public Comment Requests

    July

    August

    • Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Work Track 5 – Geographic Names at the Top-Level)
    • Proposal for Devanagari Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
    • Proposal for Gurumukhi Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
    • Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team – Final Report
    • New gTLD Auction Proceeds Cross Community Working Group (CCWG) – Initial Report
    • Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
    • Proposal for Gujarati Script Root Zone Label
    • Proposals for Bengali, Malayalam, and Tamil Scripts Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)

    August

    • Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations
    • Proposal for Sinhala Script Root Zone Label
    • Proposal for Telugu Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
    • Proposal for Kannada Script Root Zone Label
    • Generation Rules (LGR)

    • Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations
    Update on ICANN Board current  issues -  presentation by Lito Ibarra ICANN Board member (10 minutes).

    September

    • Registration Directory Service Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) Draft Report
    • Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
    • Recommendations on the Technical Use of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
    • Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
  13. Temporary Specification for  gTLD Registration Data. Leon Sanchez (15 20 minutes).Update on Governance WG. Sergio Salinas Porto (10
  14. minutes)WT5 of PDP on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures. Javier Rúa (ALAC Member) - 15 minutes.
  15. AOB  (5 minutes)
    Daniel Fink -  Announcement  ICANN 62 LAC Readout -  July 19 2018 at 18:00 UTC.