Date: Monday, 20 August 2018
Time: 23:00 UTC (for the time in various timezones click here)
Meeting Number: AL.LAC/MT.0820/1
How can I participate in this meeting?
¿Cómo se puede participar en la teleconferencia?
English Conference ID = 1638
Spanish Conference ID = 1738
French Conference ID = 1838
Portuguese Conference ID = 5393
Adobe Connect Room: https://participate.icann.org/lacralo/
Action Items: EN & ES
Recording: EN, ES, PT, FR
AC Chat Transcript: EN/ES
Transcription: EN, ES, PT, FR
Participants:
ES: Wladimir Davalos, Javier Rua-Jovet, Sergio Salinas Porto, Maritza Aguero, Adrian Carballo, Humberto Carrasco, Ricardo Holmquist, Antonio Medina Gomez, Alberto Soto, Gilberto Lara, Leon Sanchez, Lilian De Luque, Lito Ibarra, Olga Cavalli, Harold Arcos, Aida Noblia, Alfredo Lopez
EN: Bartlett Morgan, Dev Anand Teelucksingh
FR:
PT:
Apologies: Vanda Scartezini, Maureen Hilyard, Heidi Ullrich (staff), Sylvia Herlein
Staff: Silvia Vivanco, Claudia Ruiz
Interpreters:
ES: Veronica and Paula
PT: Bettina and Esperanza
FR: Claire
Call Management: Claudia Ruiz
AGENDA ES
- Bienvenida - Humberto Carrasco (1 minuto).
- Aprobación de la Agenda - Maritza Agüero (2 minutos).
- Revisión de las consultas públicas del ALAC. Presentación a cargo de Alberto Soto, ALAC Member (15 minutos).
Statements approved by the ALAC
Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process
The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews
Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation.Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews
The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata
The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset.Statements in process - Drafting, Comment or Vote
Drafting ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model Requested ASAP
Penholder(s): TBCComment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.7 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
Penholder(s): Holly Raiche, Jonathan Zuck, Alan GreenbergDrafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4)
Penholder(s): Jonathan ZuckDrafting Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains
Penholder(s): Satish BabuDrafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0
Penholder(s): TBCStatements that seem to be stalled
- None
Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements
New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions
Upcoming Public Comment Requests
August
- Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Work Track 5 – Geographic Names at the Top-Level)
- Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team – Final Report
- Proposals for Bengali, Malayalam, and Tamil Scripts Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
- Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations
- Proposal for Sinhala Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
- Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Work Track 5 – Geographic Names at the Top-Level)
September
- Registration Directory Service Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) Draft Report
- Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
- Recommendations on the Technical Use of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
- Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
- Registration Directory Service Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) Draft Report
- Especificación Temporaria para los datos de registración de gTLD. Presentación a cargo de León Sánchez, Miembro de la Junta Directiva de ICANN (20 minutos).
- Procedimientos posteriores de nuevos gTLD - Actualización y seguimiento de trabajo sobre el uso de nombres geográficos en el nivel superior (WT5). Presentación a cargo de Javier Rúa (ALAC Member) - 15 minutos.
- Otros temas de interés - (10 minutos).
ENGLISH EN
- Welcome - Humberto Carrasco (1 minute).
- Agenda Aproval - Maritza Aguero (2 minutes).
- ALAC Public Consultations - Alberto Soto, ALAC member (15 minutes).
Statements approved by the ALAC
Initial Report on the Protections for Certain Red Cross Names in all gTLDs – Policy Amendment Process
The ALAC has always taken the position that as a humanitarian organization, and one that has been regularly the target of those seeking to fraudulently attract donations, the Red Cross should be afforded the courtesy of having its various identifiers protected at the second level in gTLD domain names.Short-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline for Specific Reviews
Of the three options presented on the public comment, the ALAC prefers the option to commence RT work upon Board action on CCWG-WS2 recommendations, to be started no later than end of June 2019. With this option, the review team will be in charge of the evaluation of implementation of prior review recommendations and other topics, with no duplication or overlap with CCWG-WS2 implementation.Long-Term Options to Adjust the Timeline of Reviews
The ALAC approached the comment by separating it into two issues: (1) Organizational Reviews and (2) Specific Reviews. The ALAC recommended ICANN Org stop initiating Organizational Reviews until its is assessed how effective they have been and develop a methodology to allow them to be cost effective and effective overall. The ALAC also recommends changing the Bylaws to give the Board more flexibility with the timing of Specific Reviews going forward.Open Data Initiative Datasets and Metadata
The ALAC made specific comments in relation to: (1) Centralized, easy access to properly organized data repository, (2) Types and value of data collected, lack of discernable information; (3) Uniformity of and responsibility for data; and (4) Privacy rights. Overall, the ALAC believes it would be useful if ICANN Org could assist in re-generating a list of datasets with suggestions on what downstream or upstream information can possibly be gleaned from each dataset.Statements in process - Drafting, Comment or Vote
Drafting ICANN Seeking Community Feedback on Proposed Unified Access Model Requested ASAP
Penholder(s): TBCComment IPC/BC Accreditation & Access Model for Non-Public Data v1.7 Requested ASAP Note: Not a formal ICANN public comment.
Penholder(s): Holly Raiche, Jonathan Zuck, Alan GreenbergDrafting Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Overarching Issues & Work Tracks 1-4)
Penholder(s): Jonathan ZuckDrafting Recommendations for Managing IDN Variant Top-Level Domains
Penholder(s): Satish BabuDrafting Draft ICANN Africa Strategic Plan 2016-2020 Version 3.0
Penholder(s): TBCStatements that seem to be stalled
- None
Public Comment requests to which the ALAC decided not to submit Statements
New Public Comment requests to which the ALAC needs to make decisions
Upcoming Public Comment Requests
August
- Initial Report on the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process (Work Track 5 – Geographic Names at the Top-Level)
- Competition, Consumer Trust & Consumer Choice Review Team – Final Report
- Proposals for Bengali, Malayalam, and Tamil Scripts Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
- Security and Stability Advisory Committee (SSAC) 2 Review: Draft Report and Recommendations
- Proposal for Sinhala Script Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
September
- Registration Directory Service Review Team (RDS-WHOIS2) Draft Report
- Implementation of Privacy and Proxy Services Accreditation Program
- Recommendations on the Technical Use of the Root Zone Label Generation Rules (LGR)
- Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
- Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data. Leon Sanchez (20 minutes).
- WT5 of PDP on New gTLD Subsequent Procedures. Javier Rúa (ALAC Member) - 15 minutes.
- AOB (5 minutes)