Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Please let the CPWG Co-Chairs and/or staff know by Tuesday, 1 March 23:59 UTC whether you would like to volunteer to draft 2-3 bullet points on recent or ongoing At-Large positions on policy and other end user issues in ICANN, such as:

  • Universal Acceptance
    1. Big improvements have been made with long TLDs
    2. Long way to go for IDNs.
    3. Measurable improvement should proceed a new round.

...

  • Global Public Interest Framework
    • The PIF is a pilot
    • Remains to be seen if it's useful
    • Need to ensure that individual internet users are central to "public interest"
    • pilot which is under consideration as a lense through which the Board and Community could situate recommendations and positions.
    • It is based on and bounded by ICANN's Articles of Incorporation and By-laws End user interests, as they are reflected in these governing documents, must be honoured
    • Security and usability require more than allowing variant TLDs to be made available unchecked.
    •  technical, operational, legal, community/linguistic factors require management policies or implementation guidance to enhance the end-user experience with IDNs and their variant TLDs.
  • Registrar Transfer
    1. Significant work in securing notifying Registered Name Holders (RNH) in the different phases
    2. Focus on establish a secure Transfer Authorization Code (TAC), inc. time to live for the TAC
    3. «Consensus" that the 60 days transfer locks (after create and transfer) is too long. 
  • IDNs
  • Recommendation Prioritization


Please reference talking points from prior ICANN meetings (67-72) on the At-Large website:

...