Page History
Active: Smartsheets Version
Action Item / Request
Date |
---|
Target Date
Responsible Council Member (if applicable)
Responsible Staff member (if applicable)
Additional Notes
Status
Buenos Aires Meeting Planning:
- Invite SG/C Chairs for weekend session
- Consider adding working session at the end of Tuesday
- Inform SG/C chairs that no formal updates are expected at the start of Council meeting, but written report would be welcomed
- Consider new format for ccNSO - GNSO Council meeting
- Provide input on possible meeting topics for Buenos Aires meeting
- Plan for attendance at GNSO Council Development Session that will take place all day and on the evening of Friday 22 November 2013.
Wolf
GNSO Review
- Form small committee to consider issues and possible next steps in relation to the GNSO review - reconfirm volunteers on existing mailing list
10/10
Jen Wolfe
PDP for relevant policies on issues not dealt with during the course of developing the 2013 RAA
- GNSO Council to further consider this issue following publication of staff paper.
One of the remaining items that may need to be addressed as part of the RAA PDP appears to be the creation of a privacy / proxy accreditation program. Staff is in the process of preparing the Report on the Conclusion of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement Negotiations, following which the GNSO Council is expected to take the next step in this PDP.
BGC Recommendation on Reconsideration Request 13-3
1. The Chair, on behalf of the GNSO Council, writes to the Board Governance Committee (copying the New gTLD Programme Committee).
2. The Chair, on behalf of the GNSO Council, writes to the ATRT2.
3. The Chair, on behalf of the GNSO Council, writes to the ICANN Board.
1. The Board Governance Committee – Drafted by [Jeff].
a. To highlight and describe the key concerns with output of the committee i.e. with the rationalisation for the reconsideration decision.
b. To make it clear that the desired outcome is to remove the current rationalisation from the record (and not to overturn the outcome of the reconsideration).
c. To recognise that the Council’s intervention in these processes is for very specific reasons and because of the perceived potential impact on the GNSO and indeed the MS Model.
2. The ATRT2 – Drafted by [Volunteer].
a. To highlight concerns with the reconsideration process as a mechanism for ensuring accountability and transparency.
b. To not propose a specific remedy but rather to leave that to the ATRT.
3. The ICANN Board – Drafted by [Jonathan].
a. To summarise and refer to both 1 & 2 above
b. To highlight on-going concerns about the issue of accountability for actions (implementation or policy) which are not in agreement with GNSO policy or policy advice.
c. To propose solutions such as:
i. Agreement to effectively communicate with the GNSO in the event that a decision goes against such policy or policy advice
(something we have already agreed to on the back of our Beijing / recent discussions)
ii. Possible change/s to the ICANN bylaws
PDP Improvements
- Staff to tabulate the proposed improvements taking into account feedback received during the Council meeting for further review and discussion.
- Council members requested to encourage their groups to review the proposed improvements and consider which suggestions can be supported and implemented.
- Confirm whether funding is available for Council liaison to the GAC per the existing travel guidelines
All
Marika Konings
Glen de Saint Gery
SCI Charter
- Jonathan to confirm the outcome of the Council discussions to the SCI (completed)
- With regard to the decision-making methodology, Council members are encouraged to continue conversations on this issue on the mailing list on whether full consensus should be maintained or not.
Jonathan
All
Metrics & Reporting WG
Re-circulate call for volunteers
Archive: Smartsheets Version
Date | File |
---|---|
2021-2022 | TBD |
2020-2021 | GNSO_Council_Action_Items_2020_2021.pdf |
Policy Issues surrounding String confusion
- Send letter to the ICANN Board / new gTLD committee that the GNSO Council has noted inconsistencies with previous GNSO recommendations in the application of string confusion decisions and will explore this issue further. (completed)
- Councillors are to encourage SG/Cs to consider / discuss how to move forward on this issue and share their feedback with the Council mailing list
Jonathan Robinson
All
Letter sent to the Board by Jonathan on 18 September (see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg14988.html).