Page History
...
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/ya37pclj
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
For agenda items 2-4 please find the relevant public comment review document:https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/15zDdzlBwLCz5m2sNXui6N6pporbUq-lDFEwfh4rKi4A/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com].
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Katrin Ohlmer Dialouts: Cheryl Langdon-Orr , Jim Prendergast |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Actions: ACTION ITEM 1: Add to the agenda for the full WG call -- ideas on implementation planning that could be passed from the WG to Goran for ICANN64. Notes: 1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided. 2. Discussion of Public Comments: 2.3.4: Universal Acceptance General Comments: Line 4, ALAC 2.3.4.c.1: Lines 6&7, BRG and RySG -- Agreement Lines 8&9, ALAC and BC -- Agreement and New Idea 2.3.4.e.1: Lines 11-13, RySG, Valideus, Brand Registry Group -- Agreement Line 14, BC -- Concerns Line 15, RrSG & ALAC -- New Idea 3. Discussion of Public Comments: 2.4.1: Applicant Guidebook General Comments: Lines 4&5, RySG and INTA -- Agreement 2.4.1.c.1: Lines 7-10, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, INTA, FairWind Partners -- Agreement Line 11, BC -- Agreement, New Idea 2.4.1.c.2: Line 13, Neustar -- Agreement (qualified support) Line 14, Govt of India -- Agreement From the chat: Anne Aikman-Scalese: COMMENT: I dont' think the AGB is particularly "verbose". It strikes me that it will not be less "verbose" as a result of this complicated policy process and it seems pretty clear that it will take time to redraft the AGB once our policy recommendations are approved by the ICANN Board. COMMENT Line 15, Fairwind Partners -- [comments below] 2.4.1.c.2.1: Lines 17-20, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, INTA, Fairwind Partners -- Agreement Line 21, ALAC -- Agreement Concerns -- In so far as the AGB’s primary target audience is applicants, the ALAC agrees with this preliminary recommendation. We also believe it is important to maintain a reference to historical context and that ought to be made easily available. 2.4.1.c.2.2: Lines 23-26, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, INTA, Fairwind Partners -- Agreement Line 27, ALAC -- Agreement Concerns: In so far as the AGB’s primary target audience is applicants, the ALAC agrees with this preliminary recommendation. However, we believe it is important to maintain the link between application process and policy which underpin the same. 2.4.1.c.2.3: Lines 29-32, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, INTA, Fairwind Partners -- Agreement Line 33, BC -- Agreement, New Idea 2.4.1.c.2.4: Lines 35-39, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, INTA, FairWinds Partners -- Agreement 2.4.1.c.2.5: Lines 41-45, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, INTA, FairWinds Partners -- Agreement 2.4.1.c.2.6: Lines 47-51, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, INTA, FairWinds Partners -- Agreement (as long as it does not cause delays) 2.4.1.c.2.7: Lines 53-56, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, FairWinds Partners -- Agreement Line 57, INTA -- Agreement Concerns: NTA agrees with this recommendation but is concerned that any agreements or terms of use are non- negotiable. The WG could explore whether there is a way for those who wish to negotiate to flag that intention. 4. Discussion of Public Comments: 2.4.2: Communications (time permitting) 2.4.2.c.1: Lines 4-7, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners -- Agreement Line 8, Valideus -- New Idea: The amount of time necessary between the final AGB being approved and the opening of the application window would depend upon possible factors such RSP pre-approval, but it should not be unduly long. Line 9, ALAC -- New Idea: The ALAC believes that the amount of time between which the final AGB is released and the time until which applications would be finally due is a function of (1) the clarity of policies, rules and procedures for the Program, and (2) how well they are set out in the AGB and made accessible. 2.4.2.c.2: Lines 11&12, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency -- Agreement Line 13, ALAC -- Agreement New Idea Line 14, Neustar -- New Idea From the chat: Anne Aikman-Scalese: COMMENT: Neustart makes a very good poiint at line 14 - hopefully this will be tagged for discussion in full WG Line 15, Fairwinds Partners -- [comments below] 2.4.2.c.2.1: Lines 17&18, Brand Registry Group, FairWind Partners -- Agreement Line 19, BC -- New Idea Line 20, ALAC -- Agreement, New Idea 2.4.2.c.2.2: Lines 22&23, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency -- Agreement Line 24, ICANN Org -- Concerns: The PDP Working Group might want to consider revisiting this preliminary recommendation once discussion regarding preliminary recommendation 2.2.3.c.1 has completed in order to ensure that the two recommendations align. Line 25, ALAC -- Agreement, New Idea 2.4.2.c.3: Lines 27-28, Business Constituency, Neustar -- Agreement Line 29, ALAC -- New Idea, Divergence Line 30, BRG -- Divergence Line 31, LEMARI -- [Does not seem directly related to this recommendation] 2.4.2.c.4: Line 33&34, Neustar, Brand Registry Group -- Agreement Line 35, BC -- Agreement, New Idea Line 36, ICANN Org -- New IDea Line 37, ALAC -- Concerns Line 38, LEMARIT -- Divergence: Not needed. 2.4.2.c.5: Lines 40-45, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement Line 46, ICANN Org -- New Idea 2.4.2.c.6: Lines 48-52, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency, Neustar, FairWind Partners -- Agreement Line 53, ICANN Org -- New Idea 2.4.2.c.7: Lines 55-59, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Neustar, FairWind Partners, LEMARIT -- Agreement Lines 60&61, BC & ICANN Org -- New Idea 2.4.2.e.1: Lines 63&64, ALAC & ICANN Org -- New Idea 2.4.2.e.2: Lines 66-69, Jamie Baxter of dotgay LLC, ALAC, ICANN Org, RrSG -- New Idea Line 70, FairWind Partners -- New Idea, Concerns 2.4.2.e.3: Lines 72-75, Jamie Baxter of dotgay LLC, ALAC, Brand Registry Group, Business Constituency - Agreement (to shorten communications period) Line 76, LEMARIT -- New Idea Next Meeting: 2.4.3: Systems |
Note |
Notes/ Action Items |