Page History
...
Active: Smartsheets Version
Archive: Smartsheets Version
| Date | File |
|---|---|
| 2021-2022 | TBD |
| 2020-2021 | GNSO_Council_Action_Items_2020_2021.pdf |
Entry Date (E)
____________
Target Date (T)
Responsible Council Member
____
Responsible Staff member
| Info |
|---|
Additional Notes |
GNSO Council strategic planning meeting
- For the purposes of planning the GNSO Council’s strategic planning session, to occur in early 2018, the GNSO Secretariat shall create a Doodle poll to determine the extent of councilor conflicts for the currently scheduled dates of 29-31 January 2017. To the extent known, incoming Councilors should also be allowed to participate in the Doodle poll
Review of the Revised ICANN Procedure for Handling Whois Conflicts with Privacy Law
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- GNSO Council, after having considered the 1 August letter from Akram Atallah and receiving a brief update from GDD on its 24 August Council meeting, should determine next steps for reviewing the Whois Procedure.
James Bladel Heather Forrest Donna Austin
Updated Charter for the Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- GNSO Council to review documents submitted by the CCWG-IG, including proposed revisions to the current charter.
Staff to add topic to the agenda for 20 April meeting
- Councilors to work with staff to compile a list of questions to be sent to the CCWG-IG
Topic to be added to the May Council meeting agenda either as a further discussion item or a motion on the GNSO’s next steps on this topic
Council to discuss and prepare motion to either express support for a new charter or withdraw as a chartering organization.
Keith Drazek to draft a motion acknowledging the work of the CCWG IG whilst requesting that the effort be continued in a different format.
Motion deferred - GNSO leadership to add this item to the Council agenda for August meeting. All Council members to provide input and proposed amendments to the motions as soon as possible so that discussion can continue on the mailing list ahead of the meeting.
Motion passed successfully during Council meeting on 24 August.
Replacement for GNSO member for the SSR2 Review Team
- GNSO Secretariat to communicate decision to the SSR2-RT, that the GNSO Council has nominated Norm Ritchie to replace Emily Taylor on that review team.
- GNSO Secretariat to inform Norm Ritchie of his selection and communicate the Council’s expectations that he represents the views of the entire GNSO community in his work on the SSR2-RT, and that as a group, the GNSO Review Team Members will provide regular feedback on the discussions taking place in the SSR2-RT.
- GNSO Secretariat to send a response to those applicants that were not selected, thanking them for their continued interest. The response should also encourage them to follow the SSR2-RT work and participate in Public Comments and community discussions.
ICANN60 GNSO ScheduleStatus colour Green title COMPLETED
James Bladel to circulate information to the GNSO Council mailing list requesting input from the community regarding choice of location of ICANN meetings, respecting gender diversity with new post-IANA structures as requested by Goran.
Standing Committee on ICANN Budget and Operations
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Staff to issue call for volunteers (Council members only) to identify its own plan of work and expected activities and share that with the Council. Staff to check ccNSO SOP work plan / charter as it may serve as a model. Volunteers to date: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben.
IRTP-C Change of Registrant issues in relation to implementation of the Privacy/Proxy Services Accreditation PDP recommendations
| Status | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
James Bladel to bring further clarification about the nature and scope of the informal discussion group the Board requested of the GNSO to the GNSO Council mailing list.
Amending Approved GNSO Policy Recommendations Relating to certain Red Cross Movement Names
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- ICANN staff to reconvene original PDP Working Group
- ICANN staff to post the recommendations of the reconvened PDP Working Group, and its proposed amendment(s) to its original Recommendation 5, if any for public comment for 30 days following the conclusion of the deliberations of the reconvened PDP Working Group
- GNSO Council to vote on final proposal following close of public comment period and receipt of input from the reconvened PDP Working Group
Outstanding IGO/INGO PDP Recommendations
Status colour Yellow title ONGOING
(E)
____________
(T)
This topic continues to be discussed with the Board and the GAC. A facilitated discussion between GAC and GNSO representatives was held at ICANN58 in Copenhagen in March 2017, with next steps yet to be confirmed.
- Council to finalize response to GAC Communique from Johannesburg (June 2017) addressing this issue
- Council Leadership and GNSO representatives Thomas Rickert (Chair, original IGO-INGO PDP), and Philip Corwin and Petter Rindforth (Co-Chairs, IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP), to consider what next steps (if any) might be appropriate for the GAC-GNSO Discussion Group on this topic (bearing in mind the projected completion date of, and likely final scope of the recommendations from, the Curative Rights PDP)
- Staff to continue coordinating with Bruce Tonkin (Board-designated facilitator) regarding possible next steps
____________________
The GAC and GNSO held facilitated discussions, with Bruce Tonkin as the designated facilitator, in Copenhagen at ICANN58 in March 2017.
The Discussion Group has gone dormant, probably because of the ongoing Red Cross discussion and while awaiting the final recommendations from the Curative Rights PDP.
PDP Improvements
Status colour Yellow title ONGOING
(E)
_____________
The GNSO Council directs staff to move ahead with the identified next steps including:
- Integrating the inclusion of the proposed PDP Charter as part of the Preliminary Issue Report
- Development of draft guidelines for the use and application for face-to-face facilitated PDP WG meetings for Council review and adoption,
____________________
