Versions Compared

Old Version 20

changes.mady.by.user Ken Bour

Saved on

compared with

New Version Current

changes.mady.by.user Ken Bour

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3
Section
Column
width25%

Image Added

Column
width75%
Panel

At the conclusion of CROPP FY-14, the Program Administrators prepared a comprehensive analysis and review of the program's performance which has been uploaded in PDF form:

CROPP-FY14 Administrator's Summary Report

...

 

Section
Column
width15%

Column
width85%


This section is intended to capture any input, suggestions, or other feedback concerning the Community Regional Outreach Pilot Program (FY14). gsecmntyrgnloutrchprgm. Please see the Pilot Program Evaluation Criteria for information concerning the types of questions that will be asked at the end of the trial and how your feedback will be utilized.

Note

You must be a registered Confluence User with an assigned Userid/Password in order to leave comments in this space. If you do not have an account and would like to procure one, please contact a member of the ICANN Staff.

To provide your input, please use the Comment space at the bottom of the page, which will accept free-form text as well as attachments (upload). Staff is particularly interested in comments about the program development as well as an evaluation of its effectiveness. Please note that, once a <Save> operation is performed, comments may not be removed except by a Program Administrator.

...

ICANN Staff thanks you for your feedback

...

ICANN Staff

!

 

...

Feedback Contributors:

Panel
bgColorlightyellow

Pilot Program Evaluation Criteria

Demonstrated value of this pilot program will be critical to determining whether it should be continued. Some of the potential factors to be assessed include:

  • How well and to what extent were individual trip objectives met?
  • In reviewing the proposed outcomes, to what extent were they realized as documented by the Trip Assessments?
  • To what extent were membership applications increased as a result of the trips and events?
  • How well did the program operate both in terms of participant adherence to guidelines and Staff administration?
  • How tightly were the trips/events linked to ICANN strategies both at the corporate and regional levels?
  • What is the perspective of Community leaders (GNSO and At-Large) as to the overall effectiveness of the program compared to its original overarching purposes?

Feedback Contributors:

Contributors Summarycolumnscommentsordername