Page History
...
13:00 PDT, 16:00 EDT, 22:00 Paris CEST, (TuesdayThursday) 01:00 Karachi PKT, (TuesdayThursday) 05:00 Tokyo JST, (TuesdayThursday) 06:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/yxwfrquf
Info |
---|
PROPOSED AGENDA
For agenda item 2, please review the Google document at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WKSC_pPBviCnbHxW171ZIp4CzuhQXRCV1NR2ruagrxs/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]. Background Documents |
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Adobe Connect Zoom Recording GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Attendance & AC chat Dial outs:Chat Apologies: Flip Petillion, Annebeth Lange, Jim Prendergast, Abdulkarim A.Oloyede, Martin Sutton, Alberto Soto |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Action Items: ACTION ITEM: Question e9: Request clarification from Honduras (RDS-HN). Brief Notes: Question e8: Line 145 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, Colombia -- official, relevant national, regional, and community languages Line 146 -- IPC -- Concerns -- official languages Line 147 -- INTA -- official languages Line 148 -- United States -- UN and official languages Line 149 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- official languages, does not support requirement of support/non-objection Line 150 -- Brand Registry Group -- Divergence -- no translations Line 151 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- no translations Line 152 -- NCSG -- Divergence -- no translations (or reservations of geo names period) Line 153 -- RySG -- [does not appear to directly answer the question] Question e9: Line 155 -- Business Constituency -- Kept Line 156 -- IPC -- Kept, or perhaps modified (to not be required if applicant is using as a .brand) Line 157 -- ALAC -- Some want to keep, some want to modify Line 158 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required) Line 159 -- Portuguese Government -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required) Line 160 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required) Line 161 -- Government of Brazil --Modified (as in, the letter should always be required) Line 162 -- United States -- New Idea -- modified (to a different standard…) Line 163 -- dotBerlin etc. -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list) Line 164 -- Dotzon -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list) Line 165 -- Brand Registry Group -- New Idea -- modified (optional) Line 166 -- INTA -- modified (to not be required if applicant has TM rights) Line 167 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) -- some want to eliminate, some want to modify Line 168 -- NCSG -- New Idea, Concerns -- modified (as in, insert contractual requirements), curative mechanism Line 169 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed) Line 170 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed) Line 171 -- RDS-HN -- [comment] Question e10: Line 173 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals Line 174 -- Portuguese Government -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals Line 175 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals Line 176 -- dotBerlin -- proposal 21 Line 177 -- dotzon -- proposals 19 (variant 3), 21, 23, 26, 24, and 25 (but qualified) Line 178 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- proposal 20 Line 179 -- IPC -- Supports proposals 19, 20, 26; opposes proposal 19 v1, v2, and v3; 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 Line 180 -- United States -- modified (to a different standard…); curative mechanism/PIC; does not reference specific proposals |