The next meeting for the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Sub Team – Track 5 – Geographic Names at the Top Level will take place on Wednesday, 17 April 2019 at 20:00 UTC for 60 minutes.
13:00 PDT, 16:00 EDT, 22:00 Paris CEST, (Thursday) 01:00 Karachi PKT, (Thursday) 05:00 Tokyo JST, (Thursday) 06:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/yxwfrquf
PROPOSED AGENDA
- Welcome/Agenda Review/SOI Updates
- Zoom Introduction
- Continue Review of Public Comments: Questions for Community Input – start at Question e8, line 145
- AOB
For agenda item 2, please review the Google document at: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1WKSC_pPBviCnbHxW171ZIp4CzuhQXRCV1NR2ruagrxs/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com].
Background Documents
RECORDINGS
PARTICIPATION
Apologies: Flip Petillion, Annebeth Lange, Jim Prendergast, Abdulkarim A.Oloyede, Martin Sutton, Alberto Soto
Notes/ Action Items
Action Items:
ACTION ITEM: Question e9: Request clarification from Honduras (RDS-HN).
Brief Notes:
Question e8:
Line 145 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, Colombia -- official, relevant national, regional, and community languages
Line 146 -- IPC -- Concerns -- official languages
Line 147 -- INTA -- official languages
Line 148 -- United States -- UN and official languages
Line 149 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- official languages, does not support requirement of support/non-objection
Line 150 -- Brand Registry Group -- Divergence -- no translations
Line 151 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- no translations
Line 152 -- NCSG -- Divergence -- no translations (or reservations of geo names period)
Line 153 -- RySG -- [does not appear to directly answer the question]
Question e9:
Line 155 -- Business Constituency -- Kept
Line 156 -- IPC -- Kept, or perhaps modified (to not be required if applicant is using as a .brand)
Line 157 -- ALAC -- Some want to keep, some want to modify
Line 158 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 159 -- Portuguese Government -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 160 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 161 -- Government of Brazil --Modified (as in, the letter should always be required)
Line 162 -- United States -- New Idea -- modified (to a different standard…)
Line 163 -- dotBerlin etc. -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
Line 164 -- Dotzon -- New Idea -- modified (to reference specific list)
Line 165 -- Brand Registry Group -- New Idea -- modified (optional)
Line 166 -- INTA -- modified (to not be required if applicant has TM rights)
Line 167 -- RySG -- Agreement (qualified) -- some want to eliminate, some want to modify
Line 168 -- NCSG -- New Idea, Concerns -- modified (as in, insert contractual requirements), curative mechanism
Line 169 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
Line 170 -- Group of Registries -- Divergence -- eliminated (as in, support or non-objection should never be needed)
Line 171 -- RDS-HN -- [comment]
Question e10:
Line 173 -- Government of Spain, etc. -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 174 -- Portuguese Government -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 175 -- Governments of Argentina, Chile, and Colombia -- modified (as in, the letter should always be required), does not reference specific proposals
Line 176 -- dotBerlin -- proposal 21
Line 177 -- dotzon -- proposals 19 (variant 3), 21, 23, 26, 24, and 25 (but qualified)
Line 178 -- Registrar Stakeholder Group -- proposal 20
Line 179 -- IPC -- Supports proposals 19, 20, 26; opposes proposal 19 v1, v2, and v3; 21, 22, 23, 24, 25
Line 180 -- United States -- modified (to a different standard…); curative mechanism/PIC; does not reference specific proposals
