Page History
...
Active: Smartsheets Version
Archive: Smartsheets Version
Date | File |
---|---|
2021-2022 | TBD |
2020-2021 | GNSO_Council_Action_Items_2020_2021.pdf |
Entry Date (E)
____________
Target Date (T)
Responsible Council Member
____
Responsible Staff member
Info |
---|
Additional Notes |
GNSO Council Liaisons to SO/ACs/PDP and WGs
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Staff to schedule call for Council leadership team, liaisons and PDP leadership for a status update (proposed timing – April)
- Staff to circulate list of CCWG/WGs/IRTs that are in need for a new liaison to the Council to solicit volunteers
- Liaisons to provide regular updates to the Council
FY18 Operating Plan
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Staff to request the Finance team find a different slot for the finance session at ICANN meetings that does not conflict with Council sessions
- Staff to add finance update as a standard update as part of the Sunday schedule to the first ICANN meeting of the year (Community Forum)
form small team of Council members to develop comments on the budget: Ed Morris, Jimson Olufuyec(BC), James Bladel
Staff to request Xavier Calvez (CFO) to provide briefing on the budget for the GNSO
James Bladel Jimson Olufuye Edward Morris
Updated Charter for the Cross Community Working Group on Internet Governance
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- GNSO Council to review documents submitted by the CCWG-IG, including proposed revisions to the current charter.
Staff to add topic to the agenda for 20 April meeting
Next Steps on Proposed Modifications to the Procedure to Address WHOIS Conflicts with National Law
Status colour Green title Complete
(E)
_____________
(T)
- Discussions to continue with Stephanie and other interested Councilors as well as affected parties (e.g. Registries, Registrars) to discuss path forward and rework motion language
- ICANN policy staff to communicate results of motion to GDD colleagues.
- GDD staff to report back to the Council within 45 days, with a projected timeline, the requested feasibility assessment, and a draft Charter for the next review of the Procedure, which is to commence no later than 1 October 2017
Stephanie Perrin
The amended motion was passed unanimously at the16 February 2017 Council meeting
Update received from GDD on 31 March 2017 with the following projected timeline:
- Drafting of staff paper, including the assessment - anticipated completion date 21 April 2017
- Public comment on staff paper – anticipated completion date 4 June 2017
- Updating of staff paper, including summary of comments and proposed next steps – anticipated completion date 16 June 2017
- Execution of proposed next steps, including forming of a review team/working group as needed following consultation with GNSO Council/community – anticipated start date end-June 2017
Approval of Appointment of an Interim GNSO Representative to the Empowered Community Administration
Status colour Yellow title ONGOING
(E)
______________
- Three months after completion and adoption of DT report, GNSO to finalize decision on appointment of GNSO representative to the EC Administration
- Council to finalize chartering of the new GNSO Standing Selection Committee at the earliest opportunity
- Council to request the new SSC to consider appointing a permanent GNSO Representative to the EC Administration as one of its first tasks, and, amongst others, also to consider whether it will be necessary for the appointee to be a member of the GNSO Council
_____________________
Drafting work on possible amendments/additions to Operating Procedures/Bylaws remains ongoing following consultation with the DT at ICANN58.
On 16 February 2017, the Council that its interim appointment to the EC Administration will continue until drafting work is complete.
GNSO Response to the GAC Communique
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
(E)
_____________
Volunteers requested to work on a draft response to the GAC Communique
Carlos Raul Gutierrez Paul McGrady Michele Neylon Donna Austin Heather Forrest Stefania Milan Phil Corwin James Bladel
____________________
Selection of GNSO representatives to RT, creation of Selection Standing Committee (SSC)
Status colour Green title Complete
(E)
____________
(T)
- Council to review process for selection of RT representatives, particularly the ability of candidates to be endorsed by more than one SO/AC, and not just those applicants that sought a particular SO/AC’s endorsement
- Council leadership, Susan Kawaguchi and Ed Morris to continue work on finalizing proposal regarding selection process for RT and other GNSO appointments for Council consideration
- Council to continue discussion on the mailing list, with a view toward agreement on a final version of the Charter for voting on at the next Council meeting, which will take place on 15 March at ICANN58 in Copenhagen
- ICANN staff to prepare placeholder motion to allow for consideration of charter and/or formation of SSC at ICANN58
Staff to circulate call for volunteers to SG/Cs and Nominating Committee Appointees in view of having members appointed by 27 March and a first meeting scheduled on 31 March
SSC to provide Council with recommendations for nominations for RDS Review Team in time for GNSO Council meeting on 10 April
The GNSO Council adopted the Charter for a new GNSO Standing Selection Committee at ICANN58 in Copenhagen on 15 March 2017
SSC has proposed a slate of candidates for the RDS Review Team for consideration by the Council at its 20 April meeting
Selection of GNSO Nominees for the Second Registration Directory Service (formerly WHOIS) Review Team
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
If the proposed GNSO Standing Selection Committee (SSC) is not chartered at ICANN58 or otherwise in time to conduct this selection process, the small group of Councilors that proposed the slate of GNSO nominees for the upcoming Security, Stability and Resiliency Review Team (with Philip Corwin standing in for Susan Kawaguchi) is to review the candidates seeking GNSO endorsement for this Review and propose a slate of GNSO nominees to the Council, based on the criteria and process currently contained in the draft GNSO SSC Charter Task assigned to the new SSC.
Letter from Thick WHOIS Implementation Review Team on Privacy Issues relating to Implementation of the Thick WHOIS Consensus Policy Recommendations
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
(E)
(T)
- Staff to post legal review document referred to in the letter to the Council mailing list
- Following receipt of the legal review document, Erika Mann and Michele Neylon to work with staff to develop possible responses to the IRT letter for the Council’s consideration, based on further legal developments relating to the topics noted in the letter
- Council to continue discussion on the mailing list, to see if there is a need to respond to the IRT
- Staff to share IRT letter with RDS WG leadership as the subject concerns all registries and registrars using a thick model and is not limited to the specific issue of transition from thin to thick WHOIS
- Council to review draft request from Councilor Erika Mann, and submit comments to the mailing list including further details on which questions an updated legal review is expected to address as well as who would be the audience for this updated legal review.
Keith Drazek and Susan Kawaguchi to review latest draft of request for legal review and suggest changes to align with the Council discussion on this topic
Outstanding IGO/INGO PDP Recommendations
Status colour Yellow title ONGOING
(E)
____________
(T)
This topic continues to be discussed with the Board and the GAC. A final Proposal from the IGO Small Group was submitted to the GAC and the GNSO on 4 October 2016, which was referenced in the GAC Communique from Hyderabad.
- Council to finalize response to Board letter on IGO/Red Cross protections (note: this may be covered by the Council’s response to the GAC Communique)
- Council to discuss the Board proposal outlined by Bruce Tonkin at the second Hyderabad Public Forum
- Staff to confirm availability of Thomas Rickert (Chair, original IGO-INGO PDP), and Philiip Corwin and Petter Rindforth (Co-Chairs, IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP), to serve as GNSO representatives (along with GNSO Council leadership and the GNSO Liaison to the GAC) for the facilitated discussion
- Staff to notify the GAC and Board members of the Discussion Group, and Bruce Tonkin (facilitator) of GNSO appointments
____________________
In June 2014, the NGPC wrote to the GNSO Council noting that the NGPC was considering available options to reconcile the differences at issue, and giving the GNSO an opportunity to consider modifying those aspects of its approved policy recommendations that are inconsistent with GAC advice in accordance with the process in the GNSO's PDP Manual. Several letters were exchanged between the NGPC and the Council up to January 2015.
In late 2014, a small group of IGO, Board and GAC representatives was formed to work on the initial NGPC proposal (from March 2014), to develop a concrete proposal for consideration by the GAC and the GNSO. The final Small Group Proposal was sent to the GAC and the GNSO in early October 2016. The GAC advice in its Hyderabad Communique requested that this Proposal form the starting point of further discussions.
The GAC and GNSO held facilitated discussions, with Bruce Tonkin as the designated facilitator, in Copenhagen at ICANN58 in March 2017.
Red Cross - At its 20 April meeting, the Council will consider the Board's request (made via resolution at ICANN58) to initiate its policy amendment process in respect of a limited set of Red Cross names,
IGO Acronyms - Bruce Tonkin to revert to the GAC and GNSO delegations following consultations with ICANN staff on proposals made during the ICANN58 facilitated discussion. The IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP Working Group is considering comments received by the GAC, IGOs and others to its Initial Report.
PDP Improvements
Status colour Yellow title ONGOING
(E)
_____________
The GNSO Council directs staff to move ahead with the identified next steps including:
- Integrating the inclusion of the proposed PDP Charter as part of the Preliminary Issue Report
- Development of draft guidelines for the use and application for face-to-face facilitated PDP WG meetings for Council review and adoption,
____________________