Page History
Active: Smartsheets Version
Archive: Smartsheets Version
| Date | File |
|---|---|
| 2021-2022 | TBD |
| 2020-2021 | GNSO_Council_Action_Items_2020_2021.pdf |
Action Item / Request
Entry Date
Target Date
Responsible Council Member (if applicable)
Responsible Staff member (if applicable)
Additional Notes
Status
Appoint GNSO Council liaison to IRTP D WG
17/01
10 April
Marika Konings
Request for volunteers sent to the mailing list (28/1) and repeated on GNSO Council Call in February as well as March. Volunteers encouraged to come forward.
Policy vs Implementation
17/01
ongoing
All
Marika Konings
Continue discussions on the mailing list and consider potential next steps
Staff Discussion Paper was published for public comment (see http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/policy-implementation-31jan13-en.htm). A session will be organized in Beijing for which all SO/ACs as well as GNSO SG have been invited to designate a representative. If not done so yet, GNSO SG are encouraged to confirm their participation. GNSO Council to continue deliberations on its role in this discussion.
Beijing Meeting Planning:
- Provide input to Jonathan Robinson for the Brainstorming session on Saturday morning GNSO Working session
Provide submissions on the Council mailing list for the GNSO Weekend discussions with:
· Fadi Chehadé - President and CEO
· Christine Willett and Senior staff
- Form a small working group composed of GNSO and ccNSO representatives to discuss and prepare the topics for the joint meeting with ccNSO/GNSO Councils on Monday, 8 April 2013
GNSO volunteers to date for small working group to prepare ccNSO-GNSO meeting: GNSO Volunteers: Petter Rindforth, Joy Liddicoat, Ching Chiao, Maria Farrell, Wendy Seltzer
There seemed to be interest from some members of Council to start discussions on the provision of proxy/privacy services. This could include discussions of under what circumstances is it appropriate to relay information sent to the proxy/privacy service provider and when is it appropriate to relay information? Should there be an accreditation process for these providers? Should there be a special agreement governing those services, etc. It was proposed to get this discussion started so that the group can help frame a possible request for an issue report to get a pdp started.
