Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
(red star)Objective

Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(iv), the Review Team will (a) evaluate the extent to which ICANN Org has implemented each prior Directory Service Review recommendation (noting differences if any between recommended and implemented steps), (b) assess to the degree practical the extent to which implementation of each recommendation was effective in addressing the issue identified by the prior RT or generated additional information useful to management and evolution of WHOIS (RDS), and (c) determine if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance results achieved through the prior RT’s recommendations. This includes developing a framework to measure and assess the effectiveness of recommendations, and applying that approach to all areas of WHOIS originally assessed by the prior RT (as applicable). 

RT1 Recommendations to be assessed by this subgroup:

Recommendations #15, 16 - Plan & Annual Reports

(red star) Leader/Rapporteur: Lili Sun

(red star)Members: Alan Greenberg, Chris Disspain, Lili Sun

(red star) Observers: John Norton

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-reports/

(red star)Conference calls

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here

Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File

06 Dec 2017

First Pass Document

v1

DOCX

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.

(red star) Leader/Rapporteur: Lili Sun

(red star)Members: Alan Greenberg, Chris Disspain, Lili Sun

(red star) Observers: John Norton

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-reports/

(red star)Conference calls

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here


Subgroup Documents


DOCX

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File

Subgroup Report

 

v8DOCX

 

v7DOCX

 

v6 (incl. FtoF #3 Agreements)DOCX

 

v5DOCX

 

v3DOCX

 

v2DOCX

 

v1DOCX
Face-to-Face Mtg #2 Slides - Findings

 

v2PPTX

 

v1PPTX
Planning Questions

 

v1PPT
First Pass Document

 

v3DOCX

 

v2DOCX

 

v1DOCX

Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date
9#37

 

Clarify what "annual report" refers to

Lili

Email

 

8#37

 

Flag portion of transcript for Lili that pertains to Alan's rationale on proposed alternative for 15.1

ICANN org


 

7FtoF#3

 

Revise recommendation to address concerns expressed about project management, communication of progress, and tracking of metrics to enable progress and effectiveness assessment. Alan/Lili

DOCX

 

6FtoF#3

 

ICANN Org to recognize problems with system that was used and to provide summary of Improvements already underway, including under new Bylaws, such as annual progress plan that would include implementation of specific review recommendations, and confirmation from RT member(s) that implementation plan reflects the intent of the recommendation.ICANN org

Email

 

5#1

 

Ask ICANN org: Over the period of WHOIS RT recommendation implementation, has there been anyone overseeing the entire package of work and, if so, did that entity issue ongoing reports and workplan, updated to track progressICANN org

Email

 

4#1

 

Update the Problem/Issue section to reflect the call discussion and then redraft the Recommendation for further discussion at the F2F.Lili

Report

 

2#33

 

Schedule a subgroup call after ICANN org provides further responses.ICANN org/subgroup


3Email

Clarifications pertaining to operating plan and annual reportICANN org

Email

 

1#26 & #27

 

WHOIS 1 - Recs 15-16 - Plan/Annual Report: Cathrin and Lili to coordinate on recommendations related to Reports also addressed under Strategic Priority

Cathrin/Lili

Email

 

Decisions Reached

Source of requestDateDecision
#37

 

Alan's alternative suggestion for 15.1 is agreed by those on the call with typos corrected and additional refinement on annual report.

FtoF #3

 

Subgroup on Rec 15/16 should result in a recommendation.

Discussed need for metrics to be identified for each recommendation, to allow for assessment of effectiveness.