AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Action Items: EN & ES
Recording: EN, ES, PT, FR FR
AC Chat Transcript: EN/ES
Transcription: EN, ES, PT, FR FR
...
Dial Out Participants:
ES: Sergio Salinas Porto, Harold Arcos, Mariza AgueroEN: Carlos Raul GutierrezMarizta Aguero, Alexis Anteliz, Carlos Raul Gutierrez, Jose Arce, Adrian Carballo, Ricardo Holmquist, Alberto Soto, Laura Margolis, Gilberto Lara, Lilian Ivette De Luque, Eduardo Diaz, An ahi Menendez, Humberto Carrasco, Juan Manuel Rojas, Lito Ibarra, Vrikson Acosta, Raitme Citterio,
EN: Dev Anand Teelucksingh, Maureen Hilyard, Rudi Daniels, Jacqueline Morris,
FR: Nikenley Severe
PT: None
Apologies: Olga Cavalli, Vanda Scartezini, Tracy Hackshaw, Bartlett Morgan, Cristan Casas,
Staff: Silvia Vivanco, Gisella Gruber, Rodrigo Saucedo, Daniel Fink, Claudia Ruiz
Interpreters:
ES: Sabrina and Veronica
PT: Bettina and Esperanza
FR: Claire and Jacques
Call Management: Claudia Ruiz
...
AGENDA ES
...
1. Roll Call - Staff (2 minutos)
...
4. Iniciativa para publicaciones regionales - Blog - Dev Anand Teelucksingh (10 minutos)
5. Estatus ATLAS III - Eduardo Diaz (5 minutos)
6. Reporte Kobe (5 minutos)
7.- Otros Temas de Interés - AOB
...
Por favor, consulte las actualizaciones de comentarios de políticas a continuación.
AGENDA EN
...
1. Roll Call - Staff (2 minutes)
2. Welcome - Sergio Salinas (1 minute)
3. Approval of the Agenda - Harold Arcos (2 minutes)
4. Initiative for regional publications - Blog - Dev Anand Teelucksingh (10 minutes)
5. ATLAS III status- Eduardo Diaz (5 minutes)
6. Kobe Report (5 minutes)
7.- Another Business - AOB
8.- Presentation: Juan Manuel Rojas - GNSO How to get involved in other Constituency as NPOC? (20 minutes)
...
Recientemente Ratificados por el ALAC
ICANN Strategic Plan for Fiscal Years 2021 – 2025
The ALAC stressed the importance of ICANN’s role in the multistakeholder model of Internet Governance (including 6 recommendations to improve its effectiveness), suggested a rebalancing of representation on the ICANN Board to enhance the Internet end user perspective, and noted that more fulsome cost/benefit analyses of programs like the gTLD expansion should be available in order predict the future impact on total resources. The ALAC also commented on strengthening the security of the Domain Name System (DNS) and the DNS Root Server System, evolving the unique identifier systems to continue to serve the needs of the global Internet user base, addressing geopolitical issues impacting ICANN’s mission to ensure a single and globally interoperable Internet, and ensuring ICANN’s long-term financial sustainability.
2nd Comment: ICANN Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan Update
The ALAC Chair determined to submit an additional ALAC statement on this public comment, in accordance with new rules regarding FY20 Additional Budget Requests (ABRs). As ABRs are no longer intended to request travel support to ICANN meetings, the ALAC decided to submit an additional comment to the FY20 Budget public comment, requesting two travel slots to support the attendance of active At-Large policy/outreach leaders in At-Large work session activities at ICANN meetings.
1st Comment: ICANN Draft FY20 Operating Plan and Budget and Five-Year Operating Plan Update
Of principle concern to the ALAC/At-Large is their ability to achieve the objectives of the At-Large Review Implementation Plan. The comments in the statement relate to particular portfolio or project areas and incorporate specific At-Large concerns, namely: language services, raising stakeholder awareness of ICANN worldwide, engage stakeholders regionally, support policy development, policy related and advisory activities, reinforce stakeholder effectiveness, collaboration and communication capabilities, coordination of ICANN participation in Internet Governance, supporting organizational reviews, and supporting stakeholder participation.
Work Track 5 on Geographic Names at the Top Level - Supplemental Initial Report of the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Policy Development Process
The ALAC notes that there has yet to be a discussion about whether any new gTLDs are needed. In case of an expansion, first and foremost, (1) strings with geographic connotations should not present harm (eg. risk for confusion) to end-users and (2) end-users, as residents of a given geographic entity, should have a say, through their governments or public authorities, in how its name is used. The ALAC prefers preventative protection mechanisms for country, territory, sub-national place and capital names. In the case of non-capital city names, there is a balanced support within the ALAC for either (1) requiring support or a non-objection letter from the relevant authority only if the applicant intends to use the TLD primarily for purposes associated with the city or (2) requiring support or a non-objection letter in any case. As to the 2012 AGB, ALAC thinks that its final version generally worked well and supports, in general, its treatment of geographic names.
Comentarios Publicos para decision
ICANN64 Joint GAC-ALAC Statement on EPDP
During ICANN64, the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) and Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) drafted and approved a Joint GAC-ALAC Statement on the EPDP. The GAC and ALAC are aligned overall with the EPDP Phase I Report, as it pertains to outstanding concerns as articulated in their respective statements to the report. The two advisory committees are in agreement on the need to distinguish between natural and legal persons. In addition, the GAC and ALAC highlighted the importance of data accuracy, the technical contact field, and protecting the public interest. The statement was drafted jointly with the GAC with input from the ALAC Liaison to the GAC, Yrjö Lansipuro, and GAC representative, Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, as well as the At-Large representatives to the EPDP, Hadia Elminiawi and Alan Greenberg.
Comentarios Publicos para decision
Declaracion actual (Consejo del ALAC, Comentario o Correspondencia)
Public Comment Name | Public Comment Close |
---|
Nombre del Comentario Publico
Status |
---|
Autores
Updated Operating Standards for Specific Reviews
Penholder(s) | |
---|---|
|
|
|
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
To be ALAC advice to the ICANN Board. |
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|