Versions Compared

Old Version 29

changes.mady.by.user Jean-Baptiste Deroulez

Saved on

compared with

New Version 30

changes.mady.by.user Jean-Baptiste Deroulez

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
(red star)Objective

Consistent with ICANN’s mission and Bylaws, Section 4.6(e)(iv), the Review Team will (a) evaluate the extent to which ICANN Org has implemented each prior Directory Service Review recommendation (noting differences if any between recommended and implemented steps), (b) assess to the degree practical the extent to which implementation of each recommendation was effective in addressing the issue identified by the prior RT or generated additional information useful to management and evolution of WHOIS (RDS), and (c) determine if any specific measurable steps should be recommended to enhance results achieved through the prior RT’s recommendations. This includes developing a framework to measure and assess the effectiveness of recommendations, and applying that approach to all areas of WHOIS originally assessed by the prior RT (as applicable). 

RT1 Recommendations to be assessed by this subgroup:

Recommendation #2 - Single WHOIS Policy

Background Documents

Further background documents may be found on the Review Team's overall Background Materials page.

(red star)Leader/Rapporteur: Carlton Samuels

(red star)Members: Carlton Samuels, Cathrin Bauer-Bulst, Thomas Walden

(red star)Mailing-list archives:  http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/rds-whois2-whoispolicy/

(red star)Conference calls: see here

(red star)Review Team Templates: see here


Subgroup Documents

Date

Document (Versions in Red are latest)

File


 


 


 


 

Jan  

 

Face-to-Face Mtg #2 Slides - Findings

v1

Subgroup Report

v1

Planning Questions

v1

First Pass Document

v3

v2

v1


PPTX


DOCX


PPT


DOCX

DOCX

DOCX

ICANN org Briefings/Answers

Open Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress Notes
4#25

 

Subgroup report pending subgroup review, if no replies by COB today (Friday 6 April), Carlton to send to RT.Carlton

 


1#1

 

Carlton to write up these findings and the proposed subgroup conclusion

Carlton

3#1

 

Interview RT1 members to understand intended benefits of rec 2 and consider providing those as input to the RDS PDPSubgroup

Completed Actions/Requests

*To be provided once reasonable date is determined by appropriate subject-matter expert

Item #Source of RequestDate of RequestAction Item RequestAction Owner

Anticipated Completion Date*

Progress NotesCompleted ResponseCompletion Date
2

#1

   

ICANN org to identify members of WHOIS1 Review Team (still active at ICANN) that worked on recommendation 2

ICANN org

 



 


Decisions Reached

DateDecision

 

Not useful to assess whether it would have been useful to develop a single WHOIS policy, since that was infeasible. Instead, assess what was done to create a consolidated policy document

 

Look to GNSO RDS PDP for a future single WHOIS (RDS) policy