AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development
Page History
...
Independent Examiner’s Final Recommendation | Using the same qualification system as for policy rapporteurs, ALAC should select 5 rapporteurs to contribute to ICANN’s plans for a demand driven multi sectoral approach to outreach, and learn from the work of the ICANN Global Stakeholder Engagement group. Rapporteurs would serve for one year (3 meetings) to encourage turnover and more genuine grass roots input. | |||
Issue Identified | Need to reinforce impact of outreach and engagement activities. | |||
Does ALAC Support Recommendation? | Reject with qualification | |||
If Not, Please Provide Reasoning. If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation? If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation. | Prioritization | Additional Working Party Comments | ALAC Comments | Status: Reject with qualification Comment:The ALAC is rejecting the concept of policy rapporteurs as defined in the Review. It is unclear exactly what the "Outreach Rapporteurs" would do at the ICANN meetings they attend. |
If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation? If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation. | The ALAC does note however that there are at times opportunities at ICANN meetings for outreach activities and does believe that volunteer travel to such meetings should be available if applicable. | |||
Prioritization | ||||
Additional Working Party Comments | ||||
ALAC Comments | ||||
Possible Dependencies | ||||
Who Will Implement? | ||||
Resource RequirementsRequirements | ||||
Budget Effects impact? | ||||
Implementation Timeline | ||||
Proposed Implementation Steps |
...