AT-LARGE GATEWAY

At-Large Website

ALAC

RALOs

At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)

At-Large Governance

At-Large Reports

Policy Comments & Advice

Working Groups

ICANN Meetings

At-Large Summit (ATLAS III)

At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development

ALAC and RALO Elections, Selections, and Appointments

At-Large Priority Activities - 2021

 

 

Independent Examiner’s Final Recommendation

Using the same qualification system as for policy rapporteurs, ALAC should select 5 rapporteurs to contribute to ICANN’s plans for a demand driven multi sectoral approach to outreach, and learn from the work of the ICANN Global Stakeholder Engagement group. Rapporteurs would serve for one year (3 meetings) to encourage turnover and more genuine grass roots input.

Issue Identified

Need to reinforce impact of outreach and engagement activities.

Does ALAC Support Recommendation?

Reject with qualification

If Not, Please Provide Reasoning.

The ALAC is rejecting the concept of policy rapporteurs as defined in the Review. It is unclear exactly what the "Outreach Rapporteurs" would do at the ICANN meetings they attend.

If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation?

If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation.

The ALAC does note however that there are at times opportunities at ICANN meetings for outreach activities and does believe that volunteer travel to such meetings should be available if applicable.

Prioritization


At-Large Comments

The ALAC notes that ICANN does do extensive outreach related to its three annual meetings, through the Fellowship and NextGen programs and through explicit support of other outreach efforts. It also supports explicit outreach events sponsored by AC/SO and constituent organizations. The ALAC agrees with all of these activities. The ALAC has also initiated its indigenous peoples outreach programs which involve travel to ICANN meetings. The At-Large General Assembly and ATLAS programs, also include a component of outreach in that many such attendees are relatively new to ICANN.

Possible Dependencies


Who Will Implement?


Resource Requirements


Budget Effects impact?


Implementation Timeline


Proposed Implementation Steps




  • No labels

4 Comments

  1. Alan Greenberg

    My thoughts

    Status: Reject with qualification

    Comment:The ALAC is rejecting the concept of policy rapporteurs as defined in the Review. It is unclear exactly what the "Outreach Rapporteurs" would do at the ICANN meetings they attend. The ALAC does note however that there are at times opportunities at ICANN meetings for outreach activities and does believe that volunteer travel to such meetings should be available if applicable.



  2. Glenn McKnight

    Status  Reject

    Comments

    We currently have  five members of  ATLARGE representing all five of our  Outreach activities.  Each chair of their region reports on their Cropp Trips, Outreach efforts, new collateral etc etc.  If they took the time to assess the WG they would know this

  3. Glenn McKnight

    Duplicated in the EMM section 

  4. Vanda Scartezini

    at least from this LAC region and I believe from other too, we have a good and productive relationship with Global Stakeholder Engagement Team dedicated to our regions, and we work together, promoting and participating in any outreach event we know and share with us.

    CROP is open to anyone and outreach is a day by day activities for LACRALO members even suing each one social media. I do not see what rapporteurs can do, but see real need to have all activities in our regions reported by each member engaged in such activities to have clear statistics from each region on the results of outreach activities.