Page History
...
Sub-Group Members: Jay Daley, Adam, Jeffrey Eckhaus, Paul Kane, Patricio Poblete, Elaine Pruis
Staff: Bart Boswinkel, Bernie Turcotte, Brenda Brewer, Kim Davies
Apologies: Elise Gerich
**Please let Brenda know if your name has been left off the list (attendees or apologies).**
Transcript
Recording
The Adobe Connect recording is available here: https://icann.adobeconnect.com/p8ainzi8rhy/
The audio recording is available here:
Proposed Agenda
i) Update from Kim, and Adam on progress of formulating an acceptable SLE
ii) An agreement from the Working Group to work with IANA staff to capture all of IANA's processes and complete the SLE after the 8th June.
iii) Approval of a statement from the SLE Design Team to be included in the Proposal (attached).
iv) Volunteers to give Presentations for participants at ICANN meeting in BA interested in the work of the SLE Working Group.
v) Any other business
Notes
Welcome chair DTA
Change of working format
CWG needs to endorese approach suggested by DTA
To be raised by Paul
1) Update from Kim, and Adam on progress of formulating an acceptable SLE
Jay Dailey on the call
Kim Davies: Green light to Evolve Document and needs further development. The draft circulated calls out principles
Adam: Question to group: Group agree to work together post 8 June 2015?
Post June 8 deadline?
What is standing of the group post 8 June. once the CWG has completed its proposal?
Note work continue under CWG umbrella
Jay: Customer needs to be involved in the discussions
Conclusion: Adam and Kim will continue to work and report to group on a weekly basis
iii) Approval of a statement from the SLE Design Team to be included in the Proposal (attached).
Run through of the document by Bernie Turcotte
Background section
Change word suggesting, -> recommending
No objection (accepted)
IRT => IFRT
Jeff Ackhaus: Last sentence: not clear to what wide time window is referring to.
Only recently, some participant raise that NTIA SLA should be used. Not acceptable to DTA: NTIA no longer part post transition. SLA no longer fit for purpose.
Clarifying language may needed.
Principle section
Paragraph 1. No comments
2. No comments
Patricio: should be reported by IANA. Should external parties be alowed be informed
Raw data is already made available. Should be re-iterated.
Agreed
3.Relevance:
Elaine: it is confusing
Jay: Rewrote section. Initial rlevance was for analysis. Not strong enough meaning.. Attempt to narrow, focus on customers. Critical measures was already in
Kim: Distinction between what IANA is to measure and report on and threshold for none compliance
Community should define what it considers relevant versus threshold measures (critical metrics)
Patricio: Relevant data is data that should be checked for compliance.
Question: Relevant what is deemed relevant for community.
Kim: guard against that every is measured is part of threshold
Analysis for customer service
Proposed wording
insert word " customer" -> customer critical metrics
4. Clear defintion
No Comments
5 Defintion of thresholds
Jay: should be set on 'Initial" data
Include "Initial"
Threshold should be set against expected service level.
Starting point is what IANA is doing.
Currently estimation of what DT A thinks is reasonable. Now need to be cautious, to set wrong expectations. Based on actual data, not prescribe
Definition of threshold taken on board, but measurement are needed
Specific Threshold undefined an define until data has been collected
Alternatively: set threshold but note it needs to be underpinned later
Include word Initial in document, and include in SLE it self additional language
6. Review Process
No Comment
7. Regular Reporting
Near real time seems excessive
Add "As and when collected" after real time
Section Capturing status-quo
Paragrpah 1. No comments
Paragraph A: No comments
Paragraph B: No comments
Paragraph C: No comments
Paragraph D: No comments
Monitoring Past Performance
Minor grammatical error
Jay: Use of the word registry to refer is confusing (IANA also registry), registry needs to be ameneded
Agreed
Omit text to clarify need to clarify needs to
Escalations
No comments
Comments of Members
Elaine Supported with edits
Jeff: Ibidem
Patricio: supported
Jay: supported
Paul: supported
Move forward to CWG to be included
v) Volunteers to give Presentations for participants at ICANN meeting in BA interested in the work of the SLE Working Group.
Invite members DTA to present for various groups
Jay:
Jeff: Wil be at the meeting _> gTLD registry
Patricio: present LACTLD and at ccNSO
Jay: Tech day
Slides: prepare standard slide deck
AOB
Conclude edits today
Closure 21.03 UTC
Action Items
Chat Transcript
Brenda Brewer: (6/8/2015 14:33) Welcome to the DT-A Meeting on 8th of June at 20:00 UTC.
Bart Boswinkel: (14:55) Hi All
Patricio Poblete: (14:56) Hi everyone
Kim Davies: (14:57) Howdy
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (14:58) fairly standard to wait till 3 after the hour
Paul Kane: (14:58) sure
Brenda Brewer: (14:58) Elise Gerich sent regrets.
Paul Kane: (14:59) thanks
Jeffrey Eckhaus: (15:02) Jeff Eckhaus here. Just joined the call
Brenda Brewer: (15:02) Jay Daley just joined phone line
Paul Kane: (15:03) Thanks
Adam 2: (15:05) My mic is not working
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (15:06) adam have you tried clicking on the little mike at the top of this window
Patricio Poblete: (15:06) No objection
Elaine Pruis-Donuts: (15:06) is the detail of their exchange being recorded/ made available
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (15:07) no
Paul Kane: (15:08) Yes they will make the iterations available to the DT on list
Paul Kane: (15:08) Actual meeting notes are not recorded
Elaine Pruis-Donuts: (15:08) thanks Paul that is good
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (15:08) it was more about Kim and Adam being able to work openly to get starfted - from this point on probably no major issues
Adam 2: (15:12) Yes that should not be an issue, but understand it will be a work in progress
Elaine Pruis-Donuts: (15:14) Thanks Adam, it is better to see the progression of a work than try to figure out how the final piece got that way
Bart Boswinkel: (15:14) Please note this is thge clean version Paul send out
Bart Boswinkel: (15:15) If someone want to see the redline please let me know
Bart Boswinkel: (15:17) Please note if you have a question on the language Bernie is reading, to raise your hand
Bart Boswinkel: (15:24) Docu,ent is scrollable for all
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (15:27) Please lower your hand if you no longer need to speak
Kim Davies: (15:51) +1
Paul Kane: (15:51) TLD Manager
Paul Kane: (15:52) ?
Patricio Poblete: (15:53) or "the requester"
Kim Davies: (15:53) Depends on context. In terms of change request submission, use "requester", in terms of who is expected to approve a change request, I would try to omit the text as it can vary who needs to approve
Patricio Poblete: (15:56) Are the parentheses necessary at the beginning of Monitoring Past Performance?
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (15:58) Paul I still have a point
Elaine Pruis-Donuts: (15:58) i will not be in BA
Kim Davies: (16:02) I will
Bernard Turcotte Staff Support: (16:03) thanks all
Kim Davies: (16:03) Thanks!
Elaine Pruis-Donuts: (16:03) thank you
Patricio Poblete: (16:03) Bye everyone