Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

MeetingDate and TimeAssignee and RALOReport

New GNSO Web Site

Mon, 25 June 2012Dev Anand Teelucksingh, LACRALO

only 5 attendees, but informative presentation by Rob Hoggarth/Berry Cobb who talked about the design process
behind the GNSO website redesign and a walkthrough of the GNSO website.

The website design was split into 2 phases - Phase 1 to meet 80% of the design goals that could be done in 20% of the time (and the launch of the GNSO website) and Phase 2 which is ongoing which is tackling the harder 20% of design goals (largely related to the archive of GNSO materials that need to be re-catalogued for easier public review) and thus requiring more time and effort.

A similiar approach for the At-Large website redesign effort that's underway could be done.

Mikey asked how the public can track/observe/monitor the discussions of the numerious GNSO WG email lists - persons joining a list/group with read/write access are considered members of the group and thus have certain expectations of being a member of that group. RSS feeds for mailing lists is a consideration for Phase 2.
A similar ability for At-Large to more easily observe the discussions happening in ALAC, RALOs and At-Large WGs
would be helpful.

New gTLD Objection & Dispute ResolutionWed, 27 June 2012Dev Anand Teelucksingh

Large attendance, detailed slides and presentations by the 3 DRSPs handling the 4 objection grounds to new gTLD applications. Two takeaways:
- for the public interest and community objections, All parties have to make full payment of ALL costs when the ICC (the DRSP responsible for handling Public Interest and Community) publishes the estimates costs for the panels to hear the objection. Minus the non-refundable filing fee, the prevailing party or parties are refunded the costs at the end of the panel decision.
- the DRSP will publish a notice on their website on receipt of the filing fee (5000 euros for public interest and community objections) by the objector during the 7 month objection period. The notice has such information such as the objector, the applicant and date and time received, but NOT the text of the objection statement itself.

IPv6 SessionThurs, 28 June 2012

Yaovi Atohoun

AFRALO/ALAC

IPv6 SESSION on June 27, 2012 in CONGRESS II from 09:00 to 10:40

RIPE NCC Update: Statistics, Policy Developments and IPv6 Outreach Activities

Andrea Cima, RIPE NCC did the presentation:

- Allocation based on the policy in the region; RIPEness

- Outreach and Capacity building: capacity building important. There is ITU IPv6 Group (2009-2012) model. Availability of an “IPv6 Requirements in ICT Document”.

World IPv6 Launch 2012: What happened

Frededic Dong and Mat Ford gave general overview of what has happened and mentioned a great participation. http://ww.internetsociety.org/deploy360 for resources.

IPv6 Deployment: The Government Perspective

Maria Hall, Ministry of Enterprise, Energy and Communication, Sweden; Anders Rafting (PTS)

  • Guidance document submitted to the Government by PTS www.pts.se/deployipv6

  • Public authorities should have deployed IPv6 no later than 2013

ccTLDs and IPv6 Deployment

by Ondrej Filip

9 o13 root servers are ready for IPv6

at least one Name server on IPv6 for TLDs

The Evolving Internet and IPv6

By Geoff Huston of APNIC: A presentation where he is convinced that Ipv6 is the only one future for the Internet to be “one Internet”.

URL for the session at http://prague44.icann.org/node/31803