Page History

10:28:36 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org To Everyone:
    Hello, my name is Yeşim Sağlam and I will be monitoring this chat room. In this role, I am the voice for the remote participants.  Please note that I will read aloud comments/questions submitted in English within the time set by the Chair of this session.
     
    When submitting a question or comment that you want me to read out loud on the mic,  please start with a <QUESTION> and end with a “</QUESTION>” or <COMMENT> </COMMENT>. Text outside these quotes will be considered as part of “chat” and will not be read out loud on the microphone.
     
    To listen to the interpretation, please click on the interpretation icon in the Zoom toolbar and select the language you will listen to and/or speak during this session.
10:28:44 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org To Everyone:
    This session also includes automated real time transcription.  By clicking on the “closed caption” button in the Zoom toolbar you can view the real time transcription.  This transcript is not official or authoritative.
     
    As requested verbally, please rename your sign-in name with your full name.  If you do not use your full name (e.g. First Name + Last Name/Surname), you may be removed from this session.
     
    Please note that chat sessions are being archived and are governed by the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior: http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/expected-standards.
10:33:07 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Welcome colleagues, bonjour à toutes et à tous.
10:35:02 From Abraham Selby To Everyone:
    Greetings to everyone, I am Selby Abraham from Ghana. Information Technology Specialist. Please connect with me via https://www.linkedin.com/in/fiifimensahselby/          It is a great time to connect with you all here for a common goal and networking. I am ever ready to learn, Contribute and network with as many as possible.
10:35:57 From Linda, Adjunct Ombuds To Everyone:
    Greetings to everyone from the Ombuds team!
10:36:40 From Bikram Shrestha To Everyone:
    Namaste ! from Nepal.
10:39:32 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Representative for Public Policy @AFNIC indeed . It is correct on the program.
10:42:46 From Sebastien Bachollet To Everyone:
    Thanks for the update of the Lucien Castex tittle
10:43:13 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org To Everyone:
    Thank you for the correction, Sébastien
10:43:20 From Amrita Choudhury To Everyone:
    Link: https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2024/CSTDSubmissions
10:43:28 From Adebunmi Akinbo, ICANN78 Fellow. To Everyone:
    Thanks @Peter.
10:43:38 From Adebunmi Akinbo, ICANN78 Fellow. To Everyone:
    Reacted to Link: https://www.it... with 
10:43:50 From Hadia Elminiawi To Everyone:
    @Amrita Choudhury thank you for the livk
10:44:05 From Dave Kissoondoyal - ICANN ALAC To Everyone:
    Reacted to "@Amrita Choudhury th..." with 
10:44:12 From Dave Kissoondoyal - ICANN ALAC To Everyone:
    Reacted to "Link: https://www.it..." with 
10:45:19 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Indeed important to participate in the CSTD consultation
10:46:02 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Since interpretation is provided, I’ll present in French . Thanks to the interpreters!
10:53:02 From Alexey Trepykhalin - ICANN Org To Everyone:
    ICANN GE publications: https://www.icann.org/en/government-engagement/publications
10:53:52 From Desiree Miloshevic To Everyone:
    The questionnaire mentioned by Peter Major is here:  https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2024/CSTDSubmissions
10:55:02 From Paul Hjul To Everyone:
    <comment> It is dangerous for ICANN and 2 of the RIRs to be issuing statements, there are 5 RIRs (although only 4 are operational) and the RIR which most clearly is in touch with the technical community supporting the Internet (RIPE) is not one of the parties to the statement. Going into WSIS +20 there really needs to be an informed well thought out approach grounded in the values of an open and accessible Internet rather than a placating of certain governments or organizations who are failing in their purpose. </comment>
11:09:17 From Paul Hjul To Everyone:
    <QUESTION> It is clear that some governments do believe in a multistakeholder governance model and others don't. If multilateral negotiation processes from UN results in a clear dividing line between states which support multistakeholder Internet and those that don't should the "community" value an IGF that is accepted by all or most states or should it adopt the stance that the values of an open public Internet that is stakeholder engagement driven? More simply is a majority but not consensus mandate from states sufficient for the IGF</Question>
11:09:26 From Gunela Astbrink To Everyone:
    +1 Nigel
11:10:24 From Emmanuel Oruk To Everyone:
    Well said Nigel and Wolfgang
11:23:18 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr To Everyone:
    Reacted to Well said Nigel an... with
11:33:22 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Long line ;-)
11:33:26 From Veni Markovski - ICANN Org To Everyone:
    To answer Paul Hjul’s question, which started with “If multilateral negotiations…” - we can’t really address a hypothetical situation. Let’s get to 2025 and we’ll see.
11:33:26 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Indeed +1
11:35:06 From Paul Hjul To Everyone:
    @Veni Markovski - ICANN Org we can live in hope, I fear though that some principled robustness from people who genuinely care about an open Internet is going to be needed
11:38:09 From Paul Hjul To Everyone:
    /jest - there are enough diplomats speaking the truth to start a pop band, unfortunately UB40 as a name is already taken
11:43:53 From Gunela Astbrink To Everyone:
    DGF ?
11:44:55 From Desiree Miloshevic To Everyone:
    DCF
11:44:57 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    No (vocal) support for the Digital cooperation forum in Kyoto and basically a strong emphasis on avoiding duplication of processes
11:45:09 From Desiree Miloshevic To Everyone:
    Digital cooperation Forum @Gunela Astbrink
11:45:43 From Charles Shaban To Everyone:
    Reacted to "No (vocal) support f..." with 
11:45:52 From Paul Hjul To Everyone:
    <comment> It is likely that so long as countries governments are formulating "national positions" the noise is going to be chatter rather than any state saying it wants a separate forum. Once a group of countries - particularly something like a regional group - form joint "national positions" with or without the support of the public in those nations then we will see things play out. </comment>
11:46:38 From Joanna Kulesza To Everyone:
    QUESTION/ Could the speakers share their opinions on the UN OEWG potentially becoming a permanent body with a mandate to negotiate a treaty? Complementarily, what would be the impact of the French PoA proposal? How likely would that permanent UN body scenario be and what impact might it have on the MSM? /QUESTION
11:46:47 From Desiree Miloshevic To Everyone:
    Here is the letter that we referred to: https://www.un.org/pga/77/2023/09/01/letter-from-the-president-of-the-general-assembly-global-digital-compact-co-facilitators-letter-issues-paper/
11:47:16 From Dave Kissoondoyal - ICANN ALAC To Everyone:
    Reacted to "Here is the letter t..." with 
11:48:09 From Gunela Astbrink To Everyone:
    Reacted to "No (vocal) support f..." with 
11:48:59 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    A good protest could totally do it ;-)
11:49:10 From Judith Hellerstein To Everyone:
    Reacted to "No (vocal) support f…" with 
11:50:57 From Gunela Astbrink To Everyone:
    Replying to "Digital cooperation ..."
    
    Understood.
11:51:09 From Nigel Hickson UK GAC To Everyone:
    Thanks Desiree
11:51:17 From Hadia Elminiawi To Everyone:
    Reacted to "ICANN GE publication..." with 
11:51:26 From Hadia Elminiawi To Everyone:
    Reacted to "The questionnaire me..." with 
11:54:55 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    We would need quite an extension to be able to answer and discuss that!
11:54:57 From Joanna Kulesza To Everyone:
    One page essay responses are welcome
11:56:43 From Nigel Hickson UK GAC To Everyone:
    Joanna you have raised important questions; think there would be significant concerns from many governments to have a standing arrangement or of course a Teaty on Cybersecurity.
12:03:38 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    4 hours extension request ;-)
12:04:57 From Chokri Ben Romdhane To Everyone:
    Pas de soucis chère @Olivier MJ Crepin-Leblond and thank you for the great session
12:04:59 From MICHEL TCHONANG CAPDA To Everyone:
    Très bonne session, félicitations à toute l'équipe et à la communauté
12:05:35 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Triumvirat ;-)
12:05:57 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Session très  intéressante , merci à toutes et à tous  !
12:06:08 From Yeşim Saglam - ICANN Org To Everyone:
    Thank you all for your participation. This meeting is now adjourned.
12:06:09 From Lucien CASTEX To Everyone:
    Merci aux interprètes