Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Deck of Cards
idUpdates


Card
defaulttrue
idDevelopments_2022
labelSHOW ME

Developments in 2021-2022 on:


Card
idAddSubPro
labelADDITIONAL WORK ON SUBSEQUENT PROCEDURES

Additional Work on Subsequent Procedures  – TO MONITOR THIS for ALAC/At-Large participation.

2022

  • 15 Jun: Council to proceed with a motion in its Jul meeting to establish a GGP to work just on Applicant Support through a Steering Committee (of a representative+observer model) with ultimate oversight by Council. 
  • 19 May: Council to explore (intersessionally) the Draft New gTLD Subsequent Procedures GNSO Guidance Process (GPP) Initiation Request.
  • 5 May: Council received a Draft New gTLD Subsequent Procedures GNSO Guidance Process (GPP) Initiation Request for its consideration. This will likely be discussed at Council's May 2022 meeting.
  • 9 Mar: Based on GNSO SubPro ODP Liaison update - Question set #2, Council discussed options for the way forward to deal with a number of areas possibly considered as incomplete in terms policy-development: including on Applicant Support, SPIRT, challenges and appeals. But Council has yet to determine the mechanism to adopt.

RE: Closed Generics, specifically

  • 21 Jul: (CG): Still awaiting convening of the Dialogue, which is inter alia subject to the identification/nomination of representatives from the GNSO and GAC.
  • 29 Jun: (CG): Council has sent a letter to the Board and the GAC relaying its recommendations on the GAC-GNSO Dialogue. Links to letter and updated recommendations pending; cc-ed to ALAC Chair, appending the Jun 2022 report of the Council Small Team on Closed Generics.
  • 15 Jun: (CG): Council has agreed to relay its recommendations to the Board and GAC as the next step leading to the start of the GAC-GNSO Dialogue, with ALAC participation.  
  • 19 May (CG): Council Chair Philippe Fouquart received a reply from Maarten Botterman to Council's 27 Apr letter; inter alia encourages GAC and Council to confer on the question of ALAC's participation in the consultative process.
  • 5 May (CG): Council's reconstituted Small Team now comprises Paul McGrady (NCA-Non CPH), Kurt Pritz (RySG), Manju Chen (NCSG), Jeff Neuman (GNSO Liaison to GAC), Justine Chew (ALAC Liaison to GNSO), Greg Dibiase (RrSG), Desiree Miloshevic (NCA-CPH), and Marie Pattulo (CSG); also Council leadership comprising Philippe Fouquart, Sebastien Ducos, and Tomslin Samme-Nlar.
  • 27 Apr (CG): Council replied to the ICANN Board, accepting the invitation for a facilitated dialogue with the GAC on Closed Generics.
    • In its reply, Council noted there being no SubPro recommendation to change current policy on Closed Generics, the approach for the immediate next round of New gTLD applications would be out of harmony with GAC Advice on Closed Generics (namely that closed generics ought to serve a public interest goal).
    • Council stated that Council will pursue next steps for the dialogue (a) on the basis of the Board having asked that its facilitated dialogue be limited to making Closed Generics available with restrictions, including for eg. that they serve a public interest goal; (b) subject to mutual agreement with the GAC on conditions for that dialogue.
    • Council also noted to the Board, NCSG's opposition to the limited dialogue party approach. 
    • (NB. The earlier convened Council small team will now be reconstituted with a larger/more representative membership of Councillors to develop conditions for the dialogue)
  • 22 Apr (GC): GAC responded to the Board's 6 Mar and 10 Mar letters, raising points on the ICANN Org's Framing Paper.
  • 6 Apr (CG): Council CGs Framing Paper Small Team convened with narrow remit of "proposing to Council next steps in responding to the Board proposal (i.e., whether or not the Council is open to working with the GAC on developing a framework for closed generics)" – Council to decide.
  • 30 Mar (CG): Board replied to GAC's 10 Mar letter, acknowledging GAC’s willingness to have ALAC participate in the consultation process; encourages GAC and GNSO Council to consider this matter as part of the discussions regarding the proposed dialogue.
  • 15 Mar (CG): Council to convene small team to review the ICANN Org's framework paper regarding the Board-facilitated dialogue between GNSO-GAC, and to suggest next steps.
  • 10 Mar (CG):  Further to the 7 Mar correspondence, the Board forwarded ICANN Org's Framing Paper for the dialogue on Closed Generics.
  • 10 Mar (CG): GAC replied to the Board's 6 Mar letter, agreeing to participate in dialogue and welcomed participation from the At-Large Advisory Committee (ALAC) in this consultation process.
  • 6 Mar (CG): ICANN Board wrote to the GAC and Council requesting for facilitated dialogue on way forward with Closed Generics (CG).


Card
idSubPro
labelSubsequent Procedures ODP

Subsequent Procedures Operational Design Phase (SubPro ODP);  See: https://www.icann.org/subpro-odp for more official info.

2022

2021

  • 20 Dec;  ICANN org announces that ICANN GDS has informed ICANN Board that it is beginning this ODP in January 2022.
  • 16 Dec:  Council mainly considered the process for SubPro ODP interactions between the GNSO ODP Liaison and the ICANN Org's SubPro ODP Team - Councillors are meant to take suggested responses of the GSNO ODP Liaison to SubPro ODP Team's preliminary questions (Question Set #1) back to their respective SG/C for feedback to enable finalization and timeous relay of agreed responses to the SubPro ODP Team. ICANN Org has a public archive of engagement on the topic.
  • 1 Dec: GNSO SubPro ODP Liaison update #3 - First call with GDS (ICANN's SubPro ODP Team)
  • 22 Nov: GNSO SubPro ODP Liaison update #2ICANN Org is still in internal project organization mode although GDD has posed a first set of questions to the GNSO ODP Liaison, Jeff Neuman. Formal kick-off of the ODP only expected at end of Nov 2021, thereafter proceeds for an approximate 10 months.
  • 17 Nov: GNSO SubPro ODP Liaison update #1


Card
defaulttrue
idDNS_Abuse
labelON DNS ABUSE

Potential Council next steps regarding DNS abuse  – TO MONITOR THIS and ENSURE ALAC input is understood.

2022

  • 20 Jul: Justine's 2nd Presentation to CPWG on Small Team deliberations on comments received from ALAC, GAC, SSAC,
  • 16 Jun: Small Team conducts meeting at ICANN 74
  • 2 Jun: Small Team begins review of responses from Contractual Compliance. 
  • 25 May: Justine's 1st Presentation to CPWG on responses from Contractual Compliance
  • 19 May: Small Team completes review of comments received from outreach to ALAC, GAC, SSAC, DNSAI, SGs and Cs.
  • 20 Apr: ALAC input to 7 Mar letter considered by Small Team and well received, in general.
  • 6 Apr: Input received from BC. Small Team met, to proceed with info gathering from Contractual Compliance in respect of action to do with DNS Abuse vis a vis Contracted Parties. Still awaiting input from other SG/Cs.
  • 4 Apr: Small Team received responses from ALAC, GAC, SSAC and DNSAI to 7 Mar letters. Small Team to meet 6 Apr.
  • 18 Mar: Reply date for 7 Mar letter to ALAC extended to 4 Apr.
  • 7 Mar: Council issued letters to ALAC, GAC, SSAC and the DNS Abuse Institute (DNSAI) to seek input on what DNS abuse issues are best mitigated via policy development specifically, if any, as a mechanism to help determine the Council’s next steps on DNS abuse; to reply by 21 Mar. Input to be sought from each SG also. More respondents may be approached at a later date. 
  • 9 Feb: Small Team initial meeting. Updates to be provided at Council Meeting #2 of 2022.
  • 4 Feb: Council small team (comprising Thomas Rickert, Mark Datysgeld, Wisdom Donkor, Maxim Alzoba, Sebastien Ducos, Greg DiBiase, and Justine Chew, also Philippe Fouquart, Tomslin Samme-Nlar, and Paul McGrady) set to begin work on 9 Feb.

2021

  • 28 Oct: A Council small team (comprising Thomas Rickert, Mark Datysgeld, Wisdom Donkor, Kristian Ormen, Maxim Alzoba, Sebastien Ducos) to draft potential GNSO Council next steps regarding DNS abuse. 


Card
defaulttrue
idConsensus_Policy
labelON MODIFYING GTLD CONSENSUS POLICIES

ICANN Org Discussion paper on Modifying gTLD Consensus Policies –  TO MONITOR THIS and assess for ALAC input opportunities.

2022

2021


Card
idTRP
labelTransfer Policy Review PDP

Transfer Policy Review Policy Development Process (TPR-PDP)

2021

  • 16 Dec: Council approved a Project Change Request (PCR) to update charter topics considered in Phase 1 of the TPR-PDP by moving the topic of NACK (rejection of transfer request) of an unauthorized transfer to Phase 1a scope from Phase 2.


Card
idIDN
labelInternationalized Domain Names EPDP

Internationalized Domain Names EPDP

2022

  • 20 Jan: Council to send letter to ICANN Board responding to the Board’s 20 Oct letter regarding the IDN Implementation Guidelines v4.0.

2021


Card
idRDA_Scoping
labelRegistration Data Accuracy Scoping Team

Registration Data Accuracy (RDA) Scoping Team

18 Nov 2021

  • Council received notice that the ICANN Board has selected two Board members to serve as liaisons to this Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team. They are Becky Burr and Harald Alvestrand (alternate).
  • Council has acknowledged the Registration Data Accuracy - Scoping Team (RDA_ST) Project Plan


Card
idSSAD
labelTemp Spec for Registration Data / SSAD ODP

Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data / System for Standardized Access/Disclosure Operational Design Phase (SSAD ODP);  See: https://www.icann.org/ssadodp for more official info

2022

  • Mar: Council Small Team seated (comprising Members: Paul McGrady, Sebastien Ducos, Marc Anderson, Stephanie Perrin, John McElwaine, Olga Cavalli, Thomas Rickert, Laureen Kapin (GAC- shared membership), Chris Lewis-Evans (GAC- shared membership), Alan Greenberg, Sarah Wyld, Steve DelBianco, Becky Burr, Steve Crocker, Philippe Fouquart (GNSO Council Observing) , Tomslin Samme Nlar  (GNSO Council Observing); and Alternates: Gregory DiBiase)
  • 1 Feb: GNSO Council Chair invited GNSO SG/Cs, ALAC, GAC to nominate their EPDP Phase 2 representatives for a Council Small Team led by Sebastien Ducos to analyse the SSAD ODA to develop recommendations on next steps.  On 4 Feb, the ALAC Chair nominated Alan Greenberg (being one of the 2 ALAC EPDP Phase 2 representatives) for this Council Small Team.
  • 27 Jan: Council and ICANN Board Consultation on SSAD ODP
  • 18 Jan: SSAD ODP Project Update Webinar #5
  • 12 Jan: A follow up discussion is held for Council and and GNSO-appointed EPDP Phase 2 members to discuss next steps ahead of Council's meeting with the ICANN Board on 27 January on concerns around financial sustainability of the SSAD (wiki)
  • 5 Jan: A 4 Jan 2022 summary paper was circulated to Council members ahead of a 12 Jan call

2021


...

January 2022 - December 2022 Reports

...

Anchor
A-22-0708
A-22-0708
GNSO COUNCIL MEETING #7 #8 (JUL AUG 2022) 

Deck of Cards
idJul2022Aug2022


Card
idShow_Jul2022Aug2022
labelSHOW ME

GNSO Council Meeting #7 #8 of 2022 held on 25 Aug 2022 

  • Agenda
  • Matters of Interest
  • Meeting Details


Card
idAgenda_Aug2022
labelAGENDA

GNSO Council Meeting #8 of 2022 held on 25 Aug 2022

Full Agenda  |  Motions 

  • TBD

For notes on highlighted items click on MATTERS OF INTEREST tab above


Card
idMOI_Aug2022
labelMATTERS OF INTEREST

Matters of interest to ALAC/At-Large

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters

  • Item 3: Consent Agenda 


Card
idMeet_Aug2022temp
labelMEETING DETAILS

Meeting Details; non-Council members are welcome to observe the meeting

GNSO Council meeting held on 25 Aug 2022 at 13:00 UTC 



Anchor
A-22-07
A-22-07
GNSO COUNCIL MEETING #7 (JUL 2022)       (go up to Directory)  

Deck of Cards
idJul2022


Card
idShow_Jul2022
labelSHOW ME

GNSO Council Meeting #7 of 2022 held on 21 Jul 2022 


Card
idAgenda_Jul2022
labelAGENDA

GNSO Council Meeting #7 of 2022 held on 21 Jul 2022

Full Agenda  |  Motions 

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters
  • Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List
  • Item 3: Consent Agenda
  • Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Initiation of the GNSO Guidance Process on Applicant Support
  • Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Policy Status Report for the Expired Domain Deletion Policy and the Expired Registration Recovery Policy - Next Steps
  • Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - PDP Improvements Tracker - Review of Format 
  • Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Council Commitments Document 
  • Item 8: ANY OTHER BUSINESS

For notes on highlighted items click on MATTERS OF INTEREST tab above


Card
idMOI_Jul2022
labelMATTERS OF INTEREST

Matters of interest to ALAC/At-Large

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters
    • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 19 May 2022 were posted on 03 June 2022.

    • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 15 June 2022 were posted on 01 July 2022

  • Item 3: Consent Agenda 
    • Confirmation of the Recommendations Report to the ICANN Board regarding adoption of recommendations 1-5 contained in the Final Report from the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs. 
      • The resolved portion of the motion to be voted on reads, "The GNSO Council approves the Recommendations Report and instructs the GNSO Secretariat to transmit the report to the ICANN Board and communicate the outcomes from the GNSO Council’s decisions as appropriate."
  • Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Initiation of the GNSO Guidance Process on Applicant Support
    • In the course of Council's consideration of the ICANN Org SubPro ODP Team's work in February 2022 - and although specifically about the topic of Applicant Support at that point - broader procedural concerns arose about whether the level of substantive work receommended by SubPro to be conducted by an IRT, would be beyond the commonly understood scope of the IRT.
    • Council agreed to explore finding avenues to complete that level of substantive work in advance of the expected IRT that would be convened upon ICANN Board adoption of the SubPro Outputs. The potential model to address this work is the GNSO Guidance Process. ICANN org staff worked with Jeff Neuman and Council leadership to prepare a draft GGP Initiation request, which was shared on Council list on 4 May 2022.
    • The potential GGP was discussed further during the Council’s June meeting, with general agreement it should be limited to the singular topic of Applicant Support. There was however discussion that additional topics should be able to be added to the existing GGP, at the discretion of the Council.
    • The updated GGP, with Applicant Support as the only topic, was shared with the Council on 13 July 2022.
    • Council to discuss and vote on the initiation of the GNSO Guidance Process on Applicant Support, which to be carried requires a Voting threshold of an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House)
      • The resolved portion of the motion to be voted on reads, 

1. The GNSO Council approves the GNSO Guidance Process Initiation Request and initiates the GGP.
2. The GNSO Council directs staff to:
a. communicate the results of this motion to the GNSO SG/Cs as well as ICANN SO/ACs and invite them to identify Members for the Steering Group following the Steering Group composition described in the initiation request;
b. communicate the results of this motion to the ICANN Org GDS Team and invite them to identify at least one (1) staff liaison for the Steering Group; and
c. launch a call for expressions of interest seeking interested candidates to Chair the Steering Group.

Action by ALAC Liaison

    •  To monitor initiation of the request for the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP), and to ensure role for ALAC/At-Large in resulting process.

    See TAB under 'POST GNSO COUNCIL MEETING DEVELOPMENTS' section for easier tracking. 

  • Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Policy Status Report for the Expired Domain Deletion Policy and the Expired Registration Recovery Policy - Next Steps
    • During the Council’s meeting in November 2020, it voted to approve a deferral for the request of a Policy Status Report (PSR) for the Expired Domain Deletion Policy (EDDP) and the Expired Registration Recovery Policy (ERRP). The EDDP defines a uniform delete practice that registrars must follow at the time of domain name expiry, as well as specific requirements for registrar handling of expired names that are subject to a UDRP dispute. The ERRP sets minimum renewal notification requirements for registrars before and after domain names expire, as well as certain requirements for renewal and restoration of expired domain names. In taking this action, the Council was careful to note that it recognized the importance of the PSR for these two expiration related Consensus Policies, but did not see the PSR as urgent at that time. After approximately 1.5 years, the potential PSR has again risen to the 0-1 month range of the Action Decision Radar.
    • Council must consider again whether a PSR is necessary and if it is timely to request a PSR from ICANN org’s Global Domains and Strategy (GDS) function. Council could consider interim steps prior to determining whether a full PSR is needed, such as reviewing ICANN Compliance data and/or requesting an update on expiration related complaints from ICANN Compliance, to help determine if there are known issues with either of the two policies.
    • Council to discuss appropriate next steps for the potential PSR for the EDDP and ERRP.

Action by ALAC Liaison

    •  To review for direct relevant to end-user (registrants), and to inform if need arises for a role for ALAC/At-Large in any resulting process 

  • Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - PDP Improvements Tracker - Review of Format
    • During the ICANN73 wrap up, the Council discussed a number of parallel conversations that have emerged since implementing PDP 3.0, identifying other aspects of the PDP where improvements could be considered. Council discussed the discussion paper and agreed that to better understand the concept, it would be helpful to have an example of what the tracker may look like. A draft of the PDP Improvements Tracker was prepared and discussed during the Council’s June meeting. While substantive review of the items in the tracker will take place in the near future, this agenda item is to help ensure that the format of the tracker meets the needs of the Council; a series of six questions are included in the PDP Improvements Tracker for consideration by the Council, to help make that determination.
    • Council will continue its review of the proposed format of the GNSO PDP Improvements tracker

Action by ALAC Liaison

    •  To review for direct relevant to end-user (registrants), and to inform if need arises for a role for ALAC/At-Large in any resulting process 
  • Item 8: ANY OTHER BUSINESS
    • 8.1 Last call for input on the Council’s response to SubPro Question Set #4

Action by ALAC Liaison

    •  Participated in the Council Small Team on SubPro Questions Set #4

See TAB under 'POST GNSO COUNCIL MEETING DEVELOPMENTS' section for easier tracking.

    • 8.2 – ICANN75 Planning

Action by ALAC Liaison

    •  To establish if there is a need for an ALAC-GNSO Bilateral Meeting at ICANN75 


Card
idMeet_Jul2022tempJul2022
labelMEETING DETAILS

Records of 21 Jul 2022 Meeting

Meeting Details; non-Council members are welcome to observe the meeting

GNSO Council meeting held on 21 Jul 2022 at 05:00 UTC https://tinyurl.com/mpz43kc2

(Wednesday) 22:00 Los Angeles; 01:00 Washington DC; 06:00 London; 07:00 Paris; 08:00 Moscow; 15:00 Melbourne 

GNSO Council Meeting Remote Participation: https://icann.zoom.us/j/92399217049?pwd=WU1GZmlaOTh6NzJ1NndkRVF0MnJEUT09 



Anchor
A-22-06
A-22-06
GNSO COUNCIL MEETING #6 (AT ICANN 74, JUN 2022)        (go up to Directory) 

Deck of Cards
idJun2022


Card
idShow_Jun2022
labelSHOW ME

GNSO Council Meeting #6 of 2022 held on 15 and 16 Jun 2022 during ICANN 74 


Card
idAgenda_Jun2022
labelAGENDA

GNSO Council Meeting #6 of 2022 held on 15 and 16 Jun 2022 during ICANN 74 

Full Agenda  |  Motions  

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters
  • Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List
  • Item 3: Consent Agenda - None
  • Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Final Report and Recommendations From the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs 
  • Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Impact of SSAD Light on Other Work
  • Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro GGP
  • Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro ODP Update 
  • Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Closed Generics Small Team
  • Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - GNSO PDP Improvements - Tracking and Coordination Discussion Paper
  • Item 10: Any other business

Under Council Wrap-up

  • Item 1: Council commitments document
  • Item 2/9: Next steps on GNSO PDP Improvements Tracker
  • Item 3: Thomas Rickart’s AOB Item - implementation preview during the PDP WG work (prior to the  consensus call)
  • Item 4: GAC Communique - GNSO response
  • Item 5: Impressions from the hybrid ICANN74 meeting
  • Item 6: AOB

For notes on highlighted items click on MATTERS OF INTEREST tab above


Card
idMOI_Jun2022
labelMATTERS OF INTEREST

Matters of interest to ALAC/At-Large

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters
    • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 14 April 2022 were posted on 29 April 2022.
    • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 19 May 2022 were posted on 03 June 2022.
  • Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Final Report and Recommendations From the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs 
    • Council to vote on a motion to approve the recommendations in the Final Report
  • Item 5: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Impact of SSAD Light on Other Work
    • Council will discuss next steps for the SSAD Light Design Concept post receiving additional information from ICANN Org that indicates that the impact to the SubPro ODP,  ZDS 3.0 and the EBERO Program and DEA improvements projects/initiatives would not be equal. Specifically, CZDS 3.0 and the EBERO Program and DEA improvements would be paused while the SubPro ODP would be delayed but not paused. Further information is expected to better understand the impact, including whether the delays would mean missing key milestones.
  • Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro GGP

Action by ALAC Liaison

  •  To review in due course an initiation of the request for the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP), and to ensure role for ALAC/At-Large in resulting process.

    See TAB under 'POST GNSO COUNCIL MEETING DEVELOPMENTS' section for easier tracking. 

  • Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro ODP Update
    • Council will receive an update from the liaison and discuss Question Set #4
  • Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Closed Generics Small Team
    • By way of background,
      • On 6 March 2022, the ICANN Board sent a letter to both the GNSO and the GAC, inviting them to “explore a mutually agreeable way forward, for which the Board could facilitate a dialogue to formulate a workable framework to identify and handle closed generic applications for the immediate next round of new gTLDs.” Shortly thereafter, and as requested by the Board, ICANN org prepared a draft Framing Paper to support the potential collaboration between the GNSO and the GAC. 
      • The Council established a small team to consider both the letter and framework, to determine next steps. To support this work, Council leadership and staff developed an assignment form, which helps make clear the narrow ask of the small team (i.e., whether the GNSO Council is open to working with the GAC to seek to develop a framework on closed generics). 
      • On 27 April 2022, the Council responded to the Board affirmatively, that it is willing to pursue next steps. Subsequently, the Council tasked the small team with preparing for the next step, of mutually agreeing with the GAC on the parameters, processes, and procedures for the facilitated dialogue. 
      • On 19 May 2022, Council received a reply from the Board, inter alia encouraging GAC and Council to confer on the question of ALAC's participation in the consultative process.
      • The small team has provided its recommendations to the Council on 11 June 2022.
    • Council will discuss the recommendations of the small team

Action by ALAC Liaison

  •  To monitor developments and to ensure role for ALAC/At-Large in resulting process.

    See TAB under 'POST GNSO COUNCIL MEETING DEVELOPMENTS' section for easier tracking. 

  • Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - GNSO PDP Improvements - Tracking and Coordination Discussion Paper
    • Council had discussed the discussion paper and agreed that to better understand the concept, it would be helpful to have an example of what the tracker may look like. Council will receive a preview of the potential GNSO PDP Improvements tracker.


Card
idMeet_Jun2022
labelMEETING RECORD

Records of 15 and 16 June 2022 Meetings at ICANN72

15 June 202216 June 2022 (Council Wrap-up)
  • Audio Recording
  • Zoom Recording
  • Transcript
  • Minutes 



Card
idSumRep_Jun2022
labelSPECIAL REPORT

Special Summary Report of 15 Jun 2022 Meeting to ALT-PLUS

For brevity, I will just highlight a few things here. For some of the issues, you can glean a wider perspective from GNSO Council Jun 2022 Matters of Interest and the meeting records from GNSO Council Jun 2022 Meeting Records.

1. EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protection for IGOs Final Report

  • Council resolved unanimously to approve all 5 recommendations in the Final Report.

2. SubPro ODP

  • Council to set up a drafting team to assist the GNSO Council’s liaison to the ODP with preparing answers to the ICANN org SubPro ODP Team's question set #4 and SubPro Topic Assumptions. Paul McGrady and Justine Chew have volunteered for the drafting team. 

3. GNSO Guidance Process for Subsequent Procedures (SubPro GGP)

  • Council will proceed with a motion in its Jul meeting to establish a GGP to work just on Applicant Support through a Steering Committee (of a representative+observer model) with ultimate oversight by Council. The scope for this GGP on Applicant Support will reflect what is currently set  out in the draft SubPro GGP Initiation Request.

4. GNSO-GAC Dialogue on Closed Generics

  • Council has agreed to relay its recommendations to the Board and GAC as the next step leading to the start of the GAC-GNSO Dialogue, with ALAC participation as a third party, through 1 ALAC-selected member (+ 1 alternate).


...

Deck of Cards
idMay2022


Card
defaulttrue
idShow_May2022
labelSHOW ME

GNSO Council Meeting #5 of 2022 held on 19 May 2022 


Card
idAgenda_May2022
labelAGENDA

GNSO Council Meeting #5 of 2022 held on 19 May 2022 

Full Agenda  |  Motions  

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters
  • Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List
  • Item 3: Consent Agenda - None
  • Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Adoption of the Revised Charter for the Standing Selection Committee 
  • Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Final Report and Recommendations From the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs 
  • Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - GNSO PDP Improvements - Tracking and Coordination Discussion Paper
  • Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Impact of SSAD Light on Other Work
  • Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro ODP Update 
  • Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro GGP
  • Item 10: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team Update
  • Item 11: Any other business
    • 11.2 SOAC Chairs Roundtable Update
    • 11.3 ICANN74 Planning

For notes on highlighted items click on MATTERS OF INTEREST tab above


Card
idMOI_May2022
labelMATTERS OF INTEREST

Matters of interest to ALAC/At-Large

  • Item 1: Administrative Matters
    • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 09 March 2022 were posted on 24 March 2022.

    • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 14 April 2022 were posted on 29 April 2022.

  • Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Final Report and Recommendations From the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs 
    • Council will consider and vote on the motion (put by GNSO Council liaison to the EPDP, John McElwaine) to adopt the EPDP Team’s Final Report of 4 April 2022.
    • Council voting threshold: Supermajority (per GNSO Operating Procedures)
  • Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - GNSO PDP Improvements - Tracking and Coordination Discussion Paper
    • Council will discuss a staff support team-developed discussion paper aimed at improving PDP tracking and coordination, which;
      • provides an overview of the different initiatives and projects,
      • suggests a possible approach for managing these different initiatives by focusing on 1) which elements could be implemented with relatively minimal effort, 2) which elements could be implemented with some effort, 3) which elements need careful planning and consideration before these can be implemented.
  • Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Impact of SSAD Light on Other Work
    • Council had met with the ICANN Board on 8 March during ICANN73, just prior to the March Council meeting and discussed the ODA and the efforts of the Council small team set up to review the ODA in detail.
    • The small team delivered its preliminary report to Council on 4 April 2022.
    • As part of the small team’s consultations with ICANN org, the org provided an SSAD Light Design Concept overview, guided by the proof of concept contained in the preliminary report. The paper anticipates a six week effort to produce the SSAD Light Design Concept paper. Notably, the resources needed to produce that document are responsible for other areas of work and developing the document will delay the timelines for each of the following projects/initiatives by 1.5 months:

      • SubPro ODP
      • CZDS 3.0
      • EBERO Program and DEA improvements
    • While ICANN org resources are directed by the ICANN Board, Council may want to provide input to the Board if there are concerns about the impact to these projects.
  • Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro ODP Update
  • Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro GGP
    • The ICANN org SubPro ODP team had shared question set #2 with Council’s liaison to the ODP on 11 February 2022,  While question set #2 was specifically about the topic of Applicant Support, it introduced broader procedural concerns, about whether the level of substantive work recommended by SubPro to be conducted by an IRT, would be beyond the commonly understood scope of the IRT.
    • Council agreed that it should explore finding avenues to complete that level of substantive work in advance of the expected IRT that would be convened upon ICANN Board adoption of the SubPro Outputs. The potential model to address this work is the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP).
    • Council will discuss the draft GGP Initiation Request and discuss next steps.

Action by ALAC Liaison

  •  To review in due course an initiation of the request for the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP), and to ensure role for ALAC/At-Large in resulting process.

    See TAB under 'POST GNSO COUNCIL MEETING DEVELOPMENTS' section for easier tracking. 

  • Item 10: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team Update
    • Council will receive an update on the progress of the Scoping Team.
    • Scoping Team Chair - Michael Palage has submitted a Project Change Request (PCR) for Council's consideration; the PCR seeks to extend the timeline of the Scoping Team's work in order to deliver the write up for assignments #1 and #2 at the latest shortly after ICANN74. The write up for assignments #1 and #2 may include recommendations for further work to be undertaken to gather data to help inform the group’s deliberations on assignments #3 and #4. This work is expected to focus on data gathering that does not involve access to registration data as further clarity on that aspect is being pursued separately. If the Council supports these recommendations, this work could continue.
  • Item 11: Any other business
    • 11.2 SOAC Chairs Roundtable Update
    • 11.3 ICANN74 Planning


Card
idMeet_May2022
labelMEETING RECORD

Records of 19 May 2022 Meeting


Card
idSumRep_May2022
labelSPECIAL REPORT

Special Summary Report of 19 May 2022 Meeting to ALT-PLUS

For brevity, I will just highlight a few things here. For some of the issues, you can glean a wider perspective from GNSO Council May 2022 Matters of Interest and the meeting records from GNSO Council May 2022 Meeting Records.

1. EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protection for IGOs Final Report

  • Council was meant to consider and vote on a motion to approve the recommendations in the Final Report but eventually resolved to defer the vote to Council's June 2022 meeting to allow the RrSG time for further consideration prior to the vote.

NB. Yrjo Lansipuro and I had presented on the substance of the Final Report to CPWG on 23 Mar, and Yrjo has provided updates re its consensus designation thereafter.

2. Impact of SSAD Light on other work

  • Council noted that ICANN org resources were likely being directed by the ICANN Board towards designing SSAD Light, and considered concerns on the impact of this on other ongoing work, including the Subsequent Procedures Operational Design Phase. 
  • Council discussed the concerns but did not arrive at a clear conclusion; Council opined that the Board would not do anything until ICANN 74 at the earliest. 

3. SubPro ODP

  • The ICANN org SubPro ODP team had shared question set #4 and SubPro Topic Assumptions with Council’s liaison to the ODP who notified Council of the same on 19 May 2022 just before Councils' meet. So, Council is to consider this further through its usual process.

4. GNSO Guidance Process for Subsequent Procedures (SubPro GGP)

  • GNSO support staff had prepared a draft SubPro GPP Initiation Request for Council's consideration. If approved, it would be the first GPP ever. Key points to note for the proposed GGP:
    • A GGP does not require a separate charter. Things like scope, working mechanism, and method of operation should all be contained in the initiation request.
    • The draft contains a concept of Group 1 versus Group 2 topics. Group 1 is where the SubPro Final Report specifically called out substantive work that it envisioned would be completed during the Implementation Review Team phase. Group 2 will be topics that are identified by the ODP Team, where they are able to determine that additional guidance is needed to support the presumed eventual implementation. The specifics for Group 2 are currently to be determined, as we await input from the ODP Team.
    • Relevant Outputs from the SubPro Final Report are reproduced, with Tasks identified or TBD. These tasks are envisioned as the specific scope of work for the GGP. Per the previous bullet, the tasks for Group 2 are still TBD.
    • The suggested working model for this group is proposed as a representative steering group, which can do the work itself, but it can also delegate the work to sub-teams where it is evident that the work is best performed by those with specific expertise in a certain field.
  • Council did not come to a decision on the draft initiation request.

5. Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team

  • Michael Palage, Chair of this Scoping Team reported that it was informed that the Board had requested ICANN org to submit a list of questions to the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to gain some insight on 4 different scenarios and for org to do a data privacy impact assessment in connection with one of those scenarios. This was to to better prepare ICANN for onward engagement with the EDPB. All stakeholders in the Scoping Team were to consult their groups on the scenario(s).
  • Michael had also submitted a Project Change Request (PCR) for Council's consideration; the PCR sought to:
    • extend the timeline of the Scoping Team's work in order to deliver the write up for assignments #1 and #2 at the latest shortly after ICANN74. The write up for assignments #1 and #2 may include recommendations for further work to be undertaken to gather data to help inform the group’s deliberations on assignments #3 and #4. This work is expected to focus on data gathering that does not involve access to registration data as further clarity on that aspect is being pursued separately.
  • No objection was raised to the PCR.

6. ICANN74 planning

  • There will not be an ALAC-GNSO Council bilateral session at ICANN74; due to brevity in length of ICANN74 and associated challenges of insufficient resources (suitable time, room and staff support). Instead, a meeting to progress any intersessional work between the 2 groups may be called if needed.


...