Page History

GNSO Council Meeting #5 of 2022 held on 19 May 2022 

• Agenda
• Matters of Interest
• Meeting Record
• Special Summary Report

GNSO Council Meeting #5 of 2022 held on 19 May 2022 

Full Agenda  |  Motions  

• Item 1: Administrative Matters
• Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List
• Item 3: Consent Agenda - None
• Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE - Adoption of the Revised Charter for the Standing Selection Committee 
• Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Final Report and Recommendations From the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs 
• Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - GNSO PDP Improvements - Tracking and Coordination Discussion Paper
• Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Impact of SSAD Light on Other Work
• Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro ODP Update 
• Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro GGP
• Item 10: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team Update
• Item 11: Any other business
  • 11.2 SOAC Chairs Roundtable Update
  • 11.3 ICANN74 Planning

For notes on highlighted items click on MATTERS OF INTEREST tab above

Matters of interest to ALAC/At-Large

• Item 1: Administrative Matters

  • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 09 March 2022 were posted on 24 March 2022.

  • Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting on 14 April 2022 were posted on 29 April 2022.

• Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE - Final Report and Recommendations From the EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protections for IGOs 
  • Council will consider and vote on the motion (put by GNSO Council liaison to the EPDP, John McElwaine) to adopt the EPDP Team’s Final Report of 4 April 2022.
  • Council voting threshold: Supermajority (per GNSO Operating Procedures)
• Item 6: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - GNSO PDP Improvements - Tracking and Coordination Discussion Paper
  • Council will discuss a staff support team-developed discussion paper aimed at improving PDP tracking and coordination, which;
    • provides an overview of the different initiatives and projects,
    • suggests a possible approach for managing these different initiatives by focusing on 1) which elements could be implemented with relatively minimal effort, 2) which elements could be implemented with some effort, 3) which elements need careful planning and consideration before these can be implemented.
• Item 7: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Impact of SSAD Light on Other Work
  • Council had met with the ICANN Board on 8 March during ICANN73, just prior to the March Council meeting and discussed the ODA and the efforts of the Council small team set up to review the ODA in detail.
  • The small team delivered its preliminary report to Council on 4 April 2022.

  • As part of the small team’s consultations with ICANN org, the org provided an SSAD Light Design Concept overview, guided by the proof of concept contained in the preliminary report. The paper anticipates a six week effort to produce the SSAD Light Design Concept paper. Notably, the resources needed to produce that document are responsible for other areas of work and developing the document will delay the timelines for each of the following projects/initiatives by 1.5 months:

    • SubPro ODP
    • CZDS 3.0
    • EBERO Program and DEA improvements
  • While ICANN org resources are directed by the ICANN Board, Council may want to provide input to the Board if there are concerns about the impact to these projects.
• Item 8: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro ODP Update
  • Council will receive an update from the liaison and discuss next steps.
  • Question set #4 and SubPro Topic Assumptions was shared with Council by its liaison to the ODP just prior to this meeting.
  • Question set #3 had been informed to Council on 11 April 2022.
• Item 9: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - SubPro GGP
  • The ICANN org SubPro ODP team had shared question set #2 with Council’s liaison to the ODP on 11 February 2022,  While question set #2 was specifically about the topic of Applicant Support, it introduced broader procedural concerns, about whether the level of substantive work recommended by SubPro to be conducted by an IRT, would be beyond the commonly understood scope of the IRT.
  • Council agreed that it should explore finding avenues to complete that level of substantive work in advance of the expected IRT that would be convened upon ICANN Board adoption of the SubPro Outputs. The potential model to address this work is the GNSO Guidance Process (GGP).
  • Council will discuss the draft GGP Initiation Request and discuss next steps.
• Item 10: COUNCIL DISCUSSION - Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team Update
  • Council will receive an update on the progress of the Scoping Team.
  • Scoping Team Chair - Michael Palage has submitted a Project Change Request (PCR) for Council's consideration; the PCR seeks to extend the timeline of the Scoping Team's work in order to deliver the write up for assignments #1 and #2 at the latest shortly after ICANN74. The write up for assignments #1 and #2 may include recommendations for further work to be undertaken to gather data to help inform the group’s deliberations on assignments #3 and #4. This work is expected to focus on data gathering that does not involve access to registration data as further clarity on that aspect is being pursued separately. If the Council supports these recommendations, this work could continue.
• Item 11: Any other business
  • 11.2 SOAC Chairs Roundtable Update
  • 11.3 ICANN74 Planning

Records of 19 May 2022 Meeting

• Audio Recording
• Zoom Recording (includes chat and visual and rough transcript. To access the rough transcript, select the Audio Transcript tab)
• Zoom Chat
• Transcript
• Minutes

Special Summary Report of 19 May 2022 Meeting to ALT-PLUS

For brevity, I will just highlight a few things here. For some of the issues, you can glean a wider perspective from GNSO Council May 2022 Matters of Interest and the meeting records from GNSO Council May 2022 Meeting Records.

1. EPDP on Specific Curative Rights Protection for IGOs Final Report

• Council was meant to consider and vote on a motion to approve the recommendations in the Final Report but eventually resolved to defer the vote to Council's June 2022 meeting to allow the RrSG time for further consideration prior to the vote.

NB. Yrjo Lansipuro and I had presented on the substance of the Final Report to CPWG on 23 Mar, and Yrjo has provided updates re its consensus designation thereafter.

2. Impact of SSAD Light on other work

• Council noted that ICANN org resources were likely being directed by the ICANN Board towards designing SSAD Light, and considered concerns on the impact of this on other ongoing work, including the Subsequent Procedures Operational Design Phase.  Council discussed the concerns but did not come to an agreement on clear conclusion but and opined that the Board would not do anything until ICANN 74 at the earliest. 

3. SubPro ODP

• The ICANN org SubPro ODP team had shared question set #4 and SubPro Topic Assumptions with Council’s liaison to the ODP who notified Council of the same on 19 May 2022 just before Councils' meet. So, Council is to consider this further through its usual process.

4. GNSO Guidance Process for Subsequent Procedures (SubPro GGP)

• GNSO support staff had prepared a draft SubPro GPP Initiation Request for Council's consideration. If approved, it would be the first GPP ever. Key points to note for the proposed GGP:
  • A GGP does not require a separate charter. Things like scope, working mechanism, and method of operation should all be contained in the initiation request.
  • The draft contains a concept of Group 1 versus Group 2 topics. Group 1 is where the SubPro Final Report specifically called out substantive work that it envisioned would be completed during the Implementation Review Team phase. Group 2 will be topics that are identified by the ODP Team, where they are able to determine that additional guidance is needed to support the presumed eventual implementation. The specifics for Group 2 are currently to be determined, as we await input from the ODP Team.
  • Relevant Outputs from the SubPro Final Report are reproduced, and that there are Tasks identified. These tasks are envisioned as the specific scope of work for the GGP. Per the previous bullet, the tasks for Group 2 are still TBD.
  • The suggested working model for this group is proposed as a representative steering group, which can do the work itself, but it can also delegate the work to sub-teams where it is evident that the work is best performed by those with specific expertise in a certain field.
• Council did not come to a decision on the draft initiation request.

5. Registration Data Accuracy Scoping Team

• Michael Palage, Chair of this Scoping Team reported that it was informed that the Board had requested ICANN org to submit a list of questions to the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) to gain some insight on 4 different scenarios and for org to do a data privacy impact assessment in connection with one of those scenarios. This was to to better prepare ICANN for onward engagement with the EDPB. All stakeholders in the Scoping Team were to consult their groups on the scenario(s).
• Micheal also submitted a Project Change Request (PCR) for Council's consideration; the PCR sought to:
  • extend the timeline of the Scoping Team's work in order to deliver the write up for assignments #1 and #2 at the latest shortly after ICANN74. The write up for assignments #1 and #2 may include recommendations for further work to be undertaken to gather data to help inform the group’s deliberations on assignments #3 and #4. This work is expected to focus on data gathering that does not involve access to registration data as further clarity on that aspect is being pursued separately.
• No objection was raised to the PCR.

6. ICANN74 planning

• There will not be an ALAC-GNSO Council bilateral seesion at ICANN74; due to brevity in length of ICANN74 and associated challenges of insufficient resources (suitable time, room and staff support). There is however an expectation a meeting may be arrange to progress any intersessional work between the 2 groups where needed.