Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  • Welcoming comments were provided by Maureen Hilyard and Philippe Fouquart.
  • Justine Chew provided the context and noted that this session is a working session. Also, expressed hope that this will be a regular meeting. 
  • Topic 1 - SSAD
    • Justine provided background and explanation of SSAD. 
    • GNSO Council. (Sebastien Ducos) - Noted it is early days for GNSO and small team to review. From the comment we have seen, many believe ODA doesn't provide all answers. More thinking is needed. One topic that was discussed with the Board is that of a pilot in order to test a few hypotheses. Everyone realizes this is a big project. There are questions on the financial sustainability, useage, etc. We will go back to the GNSO Council and then to the Board. 
    • ALAC (Alan Greenberg and Hadia Elminiawi) - Hadia noted that the implementation timeline of 5-6 years raises many questions. Will this system be obsolete in 6 years? Is it flexible enough? Alan raised point that many believe that the ODA will not meet needs. Noted the ALAC is against the SSAD. 
  • Topic 2 - SubPro ODP
    • Justine provided background and explanation of SubPro ODP.
    • GNSO Council (Jeff Neuman) - Noted that two sets of questions received by org GDS. We submitted answers to the first set and are working through the second set. ICANN org is responsible to do all the implementation. GNSO council discussed on two meetings. Regardless of whether this is classified as policy or implementation, there is recognition that there is much work to be done. The GNSO Council is exploring if some of the work can be done now. 
    • ALAC (Jonathan Zuck) -  Commented that the ALAC felt that there were still some policy issues remaining (applicant support). 
  • Topic 3 - DNS Abuse Mitigation
    • Justine provided background and explanation of DNS Abuse mitigation. 
    • GNSO Council (Mark Datysgeld) - GNSO council has sent outreach forms to the community. We are hoping to hear their views by end of March. We have not yet reached agreement on definitions. Outlined steps from the policy side. Looking for the community to arrive at aspects that can be addressed. Noted that a more complete policy action can be reached. Once we hear back from the community at the end of March, they will have a meeting. Noted they wish to scope something attainable. 
    • ALAC (Jonathan Zuck) - The task in  front of us is who can be doing what. The DNS Abuse Institute, policy and ICANN. We need to do the homework on what steps fall in the rights hands. Would like ICANN Compliance can sit down with them and work things out. The ALAC will do our best to do our assessments. It is possible that the GNSO has a role in developing in the trusted notifier program. Acknowledged that we have received the letter with three broad questions. 
  • Topic 4 - Priorities for 2022
    • GNSO Council - (Philippe) - Cited recent GNSO webinars. The above topics, as well as IDNs, IGO, and Scoping Team on Data Accuracy. These activities will take a lot of time.
    • ALAC (Cheryl Langdon-Orr) - The ALAC and Regional Leaders have had metrics in place since the ICANN Meeting in Mexico. However, since the 2nd At-Large Review, we have focused on ALS and Unaffiliated Members. 
    • ALAC (Alan Greenberg) - Explained ALSes and new expectations as well as plans for mobilization. 
    • ALAC (Roberto Gaetano) - Introduced unaffiliated member mobilization activities. Noted potential for individual members. 

...

Joint Session: ALAC & GAC

  • Topic 1

...

  • - Public Interest Processes, discussed in light of the plenary

...

  • session 
    • ALAC (Marita Moll) - Provided a review of the Global Public Interest Framework (GPIF) that took place at ICANN73. Outcome included general agreement that the GPIF should continue moving forward.
    • GAC (Veliiar Nemiguentcheva) - Noted for the GAC the question on how the GPIF can be used, including 1) who should be applying the GPIF; 2) When it should be applied and 3) How it should be applied (TBC); Also, how to reconcile the MSM and the different interests among the stakeholders. There is still some questions on the next steps.
    • Next steps - ALAC/GAC to discuss more to fully understand how to use the GPIF and collaboration opportunities.   
  • Topic 2 - Universal Acceptance and IDNs 
    • ALAC (Satish Babu) - Clear and significant alignment of interests between GAC and ALAC on UA and IDNs; Numerous benefits of closing the UA gap, still important gaps on UA readiness; ALAC has been taking up UA-related activities within the RALOs; Noted the ALAC work on an end user survey on IDNs and UA in India in the Hindi language. 
    • GAC (Nigel Hickson) - Noted that the UA/IDNs are extremely importance and that are commitment to everyone having access to the internet, IDNs and UA are key. Reviewed session on UA during ICANN73. Although progress has been made, governments need to do more. Commented that end users who are coming to governments asking for IDNS and UA and therefore there should be greater collaboration between GAC and ALAC. 
  • Topic 3 - SSAD
  • Topic 4 -ALAC

Topic 2: Universal Acceptance and IDNs 

Topic 3: SSAD

...

  • and GAC Coordination at the National Level