Comment Close
Date
Statement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s)

Call for
Comments Open
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote OpenVote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number
 

Proposed implementation of GNSO Policy Development Process Recommendations on Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D

ADOPTED 11Y, 0N, 0AHolly Raiche     AL-ALAC-ST-1215-01-00-EN

For information about this Public Comment, please click here 

 

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

Click here to download the PDF Document below.

 



FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

The ALAC supports the Report of the Implementation of the GNSO Policy Development Process Recommendations of the IRTP-D. However, in discussions in the original WG and the Implementation WG, the ALAC stressed the need for clear and accessible information on both the transfer process itself and the dispute resolution mechanisms for non-compliant transfers. Specifically, the recommendations are:

Recommendation #11.The WG recommends that ICANN take the necessary steps to display information relevant to disputing non-compliant transfers prominently on its website and assure the information is presented in a simple and clear manner and is easily accessible for registrants.

Recommendation #12. The WG recommends that ICANN create and maintain a user-friendly, one-stop website containing all relevant information concerning disputed transfers and potential remedies to registrants. Such a website should be clearly accessible from or integrated into the ICANN Registrants’ Benefits and Responsibilities page or similar

That information is not currently on the ICANN website in a place or format that would be easily accessible and understood by registrants. We therefore urge the GNSO to ensure that such information is provided on the ICANN website in clear, simple language as soon as possible.

 


FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTED

The ALAC supports the Report of the Implementation of the GNSO Policy Development Recommndations of the IRTP-D. However, in discussions in the original WG and the Implementation WG discussions, the ALAC stressed the need for clear and accesible information on both the transfer process itself and the dispute resolution mechanisms for non-compliant transfers.  Specifically, the recommendations are:

Recommendation #11.The WG recommends that ICANN take the necessary steps to display information relevant to disputing non - compliant transfers prominently on its web site and assure the information is presented in a simple and clear manner and is easily accessible for registrants.

Recommendation #12. The WG recommends that ICANN create and maintain a user-friendly, one-stop website containing all relevant information concerning disputed transfers and potential remedies to registrants. Such a website should be clearly accessible from or integrated into the ICANN Registrants’ Benefits and Responsibilities page or similar

That information is not currently on the ICANN website in a place or format that would be easily accessible and understood by registrants. We therefore urge the GNSO to ensure that such information is provided on the ICANN website in clear, simple language as soon as possible.

  • No labels

2 Comments

  1. The ALAC supports the Report of the Implementation of the GNSO Policy Development Recommndations of the IRTP-D. However, in discussions in the original WG and the Implementation WG discussions, the ALAC stressed the need for clear and accesible information on both the transfer process itself and the dispute resolution mechanisms for non-compliant transfers.  Specifically, the recommendations are:

    Recommendation #11.The WG recommends that ICANN take the necessary steps to display information relevant to disputing non - compliant transfers prominently on its web site and assure the information is presented in a simple and clear manner and is easily accessible for registrants.

    Recommendation #12. The WG recommends that ICANN create and maintain a user-friendly, one-stop website containing all relevant information concerning disputed transfers and potential remedies to registrants. Such a website should be clearly accessible from or integrated into the ICANN Registrants’ Benefits and Responsibilities page or similar

    That information is not currently on the ICANN website in a place or format that would be easily accessible and understood by registrants. We therefore urge the GNSO to ensure that such information is provided on the ICANN website in clear, simple language as soon as possible.

  2. Nuestra organización coincide plenamente en cuanto que un sitio web debe ser claramente accesible desde o integrado en la página de los solicitantes de registro de ICANN 'Beneficios y Responsabilidades. Es importante incorporar las diferentes traducciones. Información de acceso ágil, clara y concreta. Cristian Casas CETIC AJB