Mailing list


Next Meeting: 17 January 2017

Previous calls: 

03 August 2016


Membership

       Members                                                                
Olivier Crépin-Leblond
Wolf Ludwig
Jordi Iparraguirre
Yrjö Lansipuro
Oksana Prykhodko
Eric Schweighofer
Bastiaan Goslings
Jean-Jacques Subrenat
Nenad Marinkovic
Anne-Marie Joly-Bachollet
 Olawale Bakare

  

EURALO List of Experts (draft) January 15, 2016- See doc

 WIKI PAGE : EURALO ALSes Subject matter Expertise Table

 

Two initial tasks:

      1. follow-up on ALS skill sets
      2.  Update and refine the list of ALS with contact points behind a login

 

EURALO DASHBOARD, document by Oksana Prykhodko

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1-aBfqqQ_Cq0u-i2eFo-H015oC-7Q5qqneDXch6CC-WQ/edit?pref=2&pli=1#gid=0

EURALO Message to ALSes -  Letter by Yrjö Lansipuro  - PDF Version                                                   

 

Users' requirements and IT innovative solutions for seniors wellbeing 

I Overview of E-Seniors Association

European projects ESE list

 

Community Resources to analyze Stakeholder Engagement - See:

ICANN Stakeholder Analysis Tool

ICANN Stakeholder Analysis (At-Large,GAC,Fellowship, ccNSO) by Country Google sheet 

 

 

  • No labels

1 Comment

  1. Thoughts on the Task Force by Yrjo Lansipuro email posted on EURALO list on Friday July 29th, 2016

    Dear members of the Task Force,

    A few thoughts on our task:

    1) It is self-evident that without active ALS's, EURALO (like other RALOs and At Large itself) would be just an empty shell. The credibility of ALAC/At Large as "t

    he primary organizational home within  ICANN for individual Internet users" hinges on whether our voice is emanating from the grassroots or just from a club of "usual suspects".

    2) As we heard from Wolf at the EURALO call (July 26), earlier attempts at enhancing the grassroots engagement have been resisted by some ALS's as bureaucratic meddling from EURALO's side. As unjustified as such criticism may be, now we have to make absolutely sure that our efforts will not be seen in such light, and don't meet the same fate.

    3) If one looks at the EURALO ALS list (https://atlarge.icann.org/alses/euralo), two facts jump out. First, the great diversity  of the ALS's as to their nature and areas of interest.

    Some cover a broad spectrum of internet and information society issues. Some are interested in a more narrow segment among them. Some are NGO's engaged in other fields that have joined the At Large because of the importance of the internet in their core activities. Thus, their engagement in At Large varies greatly in relevance and subject matter interest from one ALS to the next. Thus, one size does not fit all . ( The other salient feature is EURALO's

    lopsided geography, especially the absence of ALS's in some parts of Europe. That is a separate problem, but our work may also contribute to solving it)

    4) Enhancing the measurable activity level of ALS's is not an end in itself. Statistics aside, we are first of all interested in their  activities that support the main role of At Large/ALAC  "to consider and provide advice on the activities of  ICANN, insofar as they relate to the interests of individual Internet users". Thus, all potential expertise "hidden" in the ALS's should be discovered and leveraged in preparing ALAC advice on ICANN activities. This would relieve the workload of those few who now do most of the drafting. Here, the diversity and different fields of specialization of ALS's could actually be a great asset.

    5) An ALS can play an important role as  a component of the multistakeholder setup at the national level and even as the initiator for national-level multistakeholder cooperation. To what extent this actually happens, varies from country to country, with have different traditions of communications among different sectors of the society, but the potential for improvement seems to be there. Like charity, multistakeholderism starts at home. The engagement of ALS´s in national multistakeholder cooperation should be actively promoted by EURALO, ie. by facilitating their contacts with other national level stakeholders active in ICANN. (The table prepared by Oksana is a good beginning for mapping the situation in various countries)

    6) In my view, the Task Force should focus on (1) how to encourage the participation of  fresh expert resources from the ALS's, according to their area of specialization, in the development of ALAC advice to ICANN's policy development processes and (2) how to encourage ALS's to play an active part in the multistakeholder processes on the national level.

     

    Yrjö