Public Comment CloseStatement
Name 

Status

Assignee(s)

Call for
Comments Open
Call for
Comments
Close 
Vote OpenVote CloseDate of SubmissionStaff Contact and EmailStatement Number

19 May 2017

Deferral of Country Code Names Supporting Organization Review

ADOPTED

13Y, 0N, 0A

Alan Greenberg

08 May 2017

15 May 2017

16 May 2017

19 May 2017

19 May 2017

AL-ALAC-ST-0517-05-00-EN

Hide the information below, please click here 

 

FINAL VERSION TO BE SUBMITTED IF RATIFIED

The final version to be submitted, if the draft is ratified, will be placed here by upon completion of the vote. 

 


FINAL DRAFT VERSION TO BE VOTED UPON BY THE ALAC

The final draft version to be voted upon by the ALAC will be placed here before the vote is to begin.

The ALAC supports the ccNSO request to defer their review.

ICANN is overwhelmed with reviews of all kinds at the moment. If the ccNSO believes that a deferral will be beneficial to their use of volunteer resources and will result in a better outcome of the review when it is performed, this is a win-win situation.

The Bylaws give the Board some discretion on the scheduling of organizational reviews (unlike the Specific Reviews where there is no latitude for deferral). The present case is an appropriate use of this discretion.

 


FIRST DRAFT SUBMITTED

The first draft submitted will be placed here before the call for comments begins.

The ALAC supports the ccNSO request to defer their review.

ICANN is overwhelmed with reviews of all kinds at the moment. If the ccNSO believes that a deferral will be beneficial to their use of volunteer resources and will result in a better outcome of the review when it is performed, this is a win-win situation.

The Bylaws give the Board some discretion on the scheduling of organizational reviews (unlike the Specific Reviews where there is no latitude for deferral). The present case is an appropriate use of this discretion.