You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 3 Next »

Independent Examiner’s Final Recommendation

ALAC should be more selective in the amount of advice it seeks to offer, focusing on those issues which might have the greatest impact upon the end user community, and going for quality rather than quantity. ALAC should develop a more transparent process for distinguishing between different types of advice, and publish that advice on the At-Large website.

Issue Identified

Quality vs quantity of ALAC advice produced.

Does ALAC Support Recommendation?

Support

The ALAC currently focuses on quality vs quantity and does not as a rule issue comments that the ALAC does not believe are important to ICANN and users. This has been a very conscious policy that has evolved over several years. The importance of this will be reinforced as new workers become involved in At-Large. The ALAC agrees that its web site does not always fully represent the diverse nature of its various statements and will work with staff to improve upon that.

If Not, Please Provide Reasoning.


If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation?

If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation.


Prioritization


Additional Working Party Comments

The ALAC supports this recommendation and notes that this is effectively today’s status quo where RALOs make use of any opportunity that they can to carry out outreach within their vast regions covering multiple countries, cultures and languages. The ALAC and RALOs encourage greater ALAC Reply to At-Large Review Draft Report - 24 March 2017 6 coordination and collaboration with regional ICANN staff, as well as with other regional organisations, for more focused outreach. An outreach calendar for each RALO was specifically set up for At-Large Structures (ALSes) and regional staff to notify regional/global members of their events. ICANN should ensure that equitable opportunities are available and supported for regional end-users (ALS or individual) to make an impact from within their regions.

However, it must also be noted that the At-Large community has often found access to funding for outreach activities to be challenging. While the Community Regional Outreach Pilot Programme (CROPP) provides funding that specifically targets outreach, this is limited to five slots per region per year (providing funding for airfares and accommodation for four days and three nights, per slot). On the other hand, any mention of “outreach” in At-Large requests for funding through annual budget processes can make requests less likely to get approval, unless other capacity building or engagement elements are added. RALOs take advantage of non-ICANN regional events that offer fellowships and other sponsorships to enable their members to attend, or an ALS may fund their representative(s), or individuals fund themselves in order to fulfil the voluntary roles and contributions they already make on behalf of their regions. 

ALAC Comments


Possible Dependencies


Who Will Implement?


Resource Requirements


Budget Effects impact?


Implementation Timeline


Proposed Implementation Steps




  • No labels