Independent Examiner’s Final Recommendation | At-Large Support Staff should be more actively involved in supporting the policy work of the ALAC, drafting position papers and other policy related work based on ALAC input. Staff competencies should be adjusted accordingly. |
Issue Identified | Staff resources are disproportionately concentrated on administrative support. Staff should have greater capacity to support preparation of policy advice. |
Does ALAC Support Recommendation? | Support in principle |
If Not, Please Provide Reasoning. | Not Applicable |
If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation? If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation. | Not Applicable |
Prioritization | Medium Priority |
Additional Working Party Comments | |
ALAC Comments | In other parts of ICANN, particularly those which generate large and substantive documents, staff plays a key role in such drafting, but explicitly at the bidding of the volunteer community. Much of ALAC's outputs are far less massive and the need for such support is lessened. At-Large Staff does support this activity and that is expected to grow. Currently, an ICANN At-Large Staff member edits and “cleans up” documents drafted by volunteers and in several cases has created the initial draft based on instructions from community members. At-Large does require additional support for communications with its members within ALSes and RALOs. On a larger scale, staff are the main content creators of the planned regular messages outlining policy activity that will be sent to individual and ALS members. At-Large also requires additional support for creating records of its meetings and discussions are under way to address this. |
Possible Dependencies | This is of course dependent on ICANN management making the appropriate resources available. |
Who Will Implement? | Staff with input from At-Large Leadership. |
Resource Requirements | ICANN Staff in support of At-Large, ICANN management |
Budget Effects impact? | |
Implementation Timeline | |
Proposed Implementation Steps |
AT-LARGE GATEWAY
At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)
At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development