You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 146 Next »

Topic

Entry Date (E)

____________

Target Date (T)

Action Item

Responsible Council Member

____

Responsible Staff member

Additional Notes

ICANN58 Meeting Planning

IN PROGRESS

(E)

_____________


   (T)

  • Council to finalize proposed block schedule for GNSO sessions (see draft circulated ICANN58 GNSO Block Schedule)
  • Council to work with SG/C leaders to consider SG/C requests for meeting slots in view of the block GNSO schedule, prior to sending block schedule back to ICANN Meetings Team.

James Bladel

Heather Forrest

Donna Austin

____________________

de saint gery

Marika Konings

 

Outstanding IGO/INGO PDP Recommendations

IN PROGRESS

 (E)

____________

  (T)

This topic continues to be discussed with the Board and the GAC. A final Proposal from the IGO Small Group was submitted to the GAC and the GNSO on 4 October 2016, which was referenced in the GAC Communique from Hyderabad.

  • Council to finalize response to Board letter on IGO/Red Cross protections (note: this may be covered by the Council’s response to the GAC Communique)
  • Council to discuss the Board proposal outlined by Bruce Tonkin at the second Hyderabad Public Forum

Thomas Rickert

____________________

Mary Wong

In June 2014, the NGPC wrote to the GNSO Council noting that the NGPC was considering available options to reconcile the differences at issue, and to give the GNSO an opportunity to consider modifying those aspects of its approved policy recommendations that are inconsistent with GAC advice in accordance with the process in the GNSO's PDP Manual. Several letters were exchanged between the NGPC and the Council up to January 2015.

In late 2014, a small group of IGO, Board and GAC representatives was formed to work on the initial NGPC proposal (from March 2014), to develop a concrete proposal for consideration by the GAC and the GNSO. The final Small Group Proposal was sent to the GAC and the GNSO in early October 2016.

Proposed GAC GNSO Discussion about GAC Advice and GNSO Policy Recommendations concerning Second Level Protections for IGO Acronyms and Certain Names and Acronyms of the Red Cross Movement

IN PROGRESS

 

 (E)

 

  •  Staff to confirm availability of Thomas Rickert (Chair, original IGO-INGO PDP), and Philiip Corwin and Petter Rindforth (Co-Chairs, IGO-INGO Curative Rights PDP), to serve as GNSO representatives (along with GNSO Council leadership and the GNSO Liaison to the GAC) for the facilitated discussion
  • Subject to their confirmation, Thomas, Phil, Petter and Carlos to be added by staff to the new Board-GAC-GNSO Representatives’ Discussion Group (IN PROCESS)Staff to send links to the new Discussion Group to Council mailing list
  • Staff to notify the GAC and Board members of the Discussion Group, and Bruce Tonkin (facilitator) of GNSO appointments
  • Staff to invite Bruce Tonkin to the next GNSO Council meeting

 

 Mary Wong

Nathalie Peregrine

 

CWG on Internet Governance

  • COMPLETED


 

____________

  (T)

COMPLETED

  • The GNSO Secretariat to communicate the resolution adopted at ICANN57 to the CWG-IG Chairs as well as the other Chartering Organizations.

Carlos Raul Gutierrez

___________________

 
PDP Improvements

 (E)

_____________

The GNSO Council directs staff to move ahead with the identified next steps including:

  • integrating the inclusion of the proposed PDP Charter as part of the Preliminary Issue Report; 
  • development of draft guidelines for the use and application for face-to-face facilitated PDP WG meetings for Council review and adoption, and; 
  • developing a survey to assess the familiarity that the community has with the different newcomer and training tools as well as their perceived usefulness (COMPLETED) - Survey results were reviewed during meeting at ICANN57 and staff will move forward with the implementation of the recommendations.

 

____________________

Marika Konings

 

 
Next Steps on Proposed Modifications to the Procedure to Address WHOIS Conflicts with National Law

 (E)

_____________

  (T)

  • Discussions to continue with Stephanie and other interested Councilors as well as affected parties (e.g. Registries, Registrars) to discuss path forward and rework motion language

Stephanie Perrin		 

Approval of Appointment of an Interim GNSO Representative to the Empowered Community Administration

IN PROGRESS

 (E)

______________

  • Three months after completion and adoption of DT report, GNSO to finalize decision on appointment of GNSO representative to the EC Administration

 

_____________________

Julie Hedlund

de saint gery

 

GNSO Response to the GAC Communique

IN PROGRESS


 (E)

_____________

 

  • Council to consider whether it will be possible (and desirable) to aim to have future responses completed before the Board and GAC have their post-ICANN Meeting call to discuss the Communique

 

____________________

 

 

Selection of GNSO representatives to SSR RT

IN PROGRESS

 (E)

____________

  (T)

  • Policy staff to notify candidates selected (including alternates) and send names to ICANN’s Multi-Stakeholder Strategy & Strategic Initiatives (MSSI) Department staff supporting the SSR-2 RT
  • Council to review process for selection of RT representatives, particularly the ability of candidates to be endorsed by more than one SO/AC, and not just those applicants that sought a particular SO/AC’s endorsement
  • Council leadership, Susan Kawaguchi and Ed Morris to continue work on finalizing proposal regarding selection process for RT and other GNSO appointments for Council consideration

Susan Kawaguchi

Edward Morris

James Bladel

Donna Austin

Heather Forrest

Julie Hedlund

Mary Wong

Marika Konings

 

Proposed limited scope for WHOIS Review Team 2

  • COMPLETED


 (E)

____________

  (T)

COMPLETED

  • Councilors to provide input (including from SG/Cs) to Council mailing list by Wednesday 21 December
  • Councilors to finalize discussions on the mailing list by close of business Los Angeles time on Thursday 22 December
  • Policy Staff to send Council response to Review Team support staff on Friday 23 December

James Bladel

 

______________________

 

GNSO Council Response to Questions from the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs concerning Work Stream 2 

  • COMPLETED


 (E)

_____________

  (T)

COMPLETED

  • Councilors to review draft response that was circulated and send comments to Council list; aim to finalize and send the response to the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs before the next Council meeting
  • Staff to contact SG/C chairs to ensure they are clear on the request, and suggest that SG/C responses be sent directly to the CCWG-Accountability Co-Chairs and the relevant rapporteurs

James Bladel

_____________________

Marika Konings

 
  • No labels
For comments, suggestions, or technical support concerning this space, please email: ICANN Policy Department
© 2015 Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers