You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 6 Next »

Attendees: 

Sub-group Members:  Alan Greenberg, Cheryl Langdon-Orr, Julf Helsingius, Lito Ibarra, Lori Schulman, Thomas Rickert   (7)

Staff:  Bernard Turcotte, Laena Rahim, Yvette Guigneaux

Apologies:  

** If your name is missing from attendance or apology, please send note to acct-staff@icann.org **


Transcript

  • Word Doc

  • PDF

Recording

Agenda

1.  Introduction, SOI, roll call

2.  Response from Legal Group re:  potential conflict of interest

3.  Annotated First Draft Guidelines – Google Doc

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1cXLh-YGFQ-XBKG-2b72oSG8rgXgfMsfPBvywK8BSLdM/edit

  • One comment posted 10-25-16 on google doc listed below:

“Per Sam LanFranco, Part 1) is a description of a reasonable and adequate evidence based process.

However, sub-items a. and c. in Part 2) are extremely problematic with regard to establishing expectations beyond very general terms of board conduct, especially with regard to specific SO/AC interests.

It is hard to conceive of anything other than either some endless list of specific expectations or a general expectation (similar to that of physicians) of “do no harm”.  I suspect that the bulk of the work here should focus proper attention to 2) d. and common procedures. Over time that would result in something akin to “case law” in defining the boundaries of bad conduct on the part of Board members.”

4. Proposed changes to annotated draft based on feedback from Hyderabad?

5.  AOB

Notes

Action Items

Documents Presented

Response from ICANN Legal.pdf

WS2GuidelinesforGoodFaithRoughAnnotatedDraft10-18-16.pdf

Chat Transcript

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Welcome all to the WS2 - Guidelines for Good Faith Subgroup |Meeting #5 Wednesday, 23 November @ 19:  00 UTC!

  Bernard Turcotte Staff Support:  hello all

  Bernard Turcotte Staff Support:  top of the hour

  Julf Helsingius:  Sounds good!

  Julf Helsingius:  No issue with it

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Do you need the response displayed Lori?  we do have it uploaded

  Lori Schulman:  sure

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Scrolling available for all

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  That could be a nice "informal" approach Lori

  Alan Greenberg:  Sorry. to be late.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  and Sam is an excellent asset and great resource... good to work with IMO

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Scrolling available if need be

  Julf Helsingius:  thanks

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Here was the comment posted on the google doc: 

  Yvette Guigneaux:  •            One comment posted 10-25-16 on google doc listed below:  “Per Sam LanFranco, Part 1) is a description of a reasonable and adequate evidence based process. However, sub-items a. and c. in Part 2) are extremely problematic with regard to establishing expectations beyond very general terms of board conduct, especially with regard to specific SO/AC interests. It is hard to conceive of anything other than either some endless list of specific expectations or a general expectation (similar to that of physicians) of “do no harm”.  I suspect that the bulk of the work here should focus proper attention to 2) d. and common procedures. Over time that would result in something akin to “case law” in defining the boundaries of bad conduct on the part of Board members.”

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  I see the points raised on that 'cause'  issue raised by Sam  and see that  just a modified 2C.can work becoming an a.  

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Hand up from Alan & Cheryl

  Thomas Rickert, CCWG Co-Chair:  One test we have to pass is that we do not undo WS1 recommendations. Therefore the question of fairness, if at all, is not relevant as this is a requirement from WS1.

  Julf Helsingius:  I am confused - I assumed anyone could *suggest*  a board member can be removed, but to actually remove a board member you still need a majority of the enpowered community?

  Thomas Rickert, CCWG Co-Chair:  The Board members know the rules of the game and they know they can be removed at any time for any reason.

  Julf Helsingius:  And yes, as a board member in a bunch of companies, I can be removed at any point if shareholders don't like me.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  exactly 

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  stepping away from AC  but have the audio channel open still

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  Where did the concept of 'secret action' come from???

  Julf Helsingius:  Ok, but that only applies to the director appointed by the AC/SO

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  still no chance of 'secret' though

  Yvette Guigneaux:  Aye aye aye

  Yvette Guigneaux:  lol

  Alan Greenberg:  To use my purple pants rationale, if in fact the person never wore pants that can be considered purple, then I would not be indemified...

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  Just don't call  Bernie 'late for dinner or drinks' Lori

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  flash back to CcNSO  FOI  Bernie nThx *shudder*

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  maybe 1 more before EOY "holiday /silly Season'

  Alan Greenberg:  'M AT igf ALSO

  Alan Greenberg:  To translate that, "I'm at IGF also"

  Lito Ibarra:  Thank you all. Good discussion.

  Julf Helsingius:  Thanks, you too!

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr (CLO):  good call thanks everyone...  Talk more on the 14th..  Bye for now then...

  Bernard Turcotte Staff Support:  b ye all

  Lori Schulman:  Thanks everyone.

 



  • No labels