Please use the <Edit Contents> menu option (directly above) to complete this form. Remember to <Save> the page (bottom right) after making updates. Other than the two required fields immediately below, you may complete any portion of this form, save, and return later to continue where you left off.
| Person Completing Form | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Name: | Berry Cobb | Email: | Date: | 13-Aug-2015 | |
| Status |
| FULL |
Work Effort Section |
| ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1) Name/Title of Work Effort: (Note: "Work Effort" might be a standing committee or a project with a life-cycle. Please keep this field relatively short and enter fuller description immediately below). | Data & Metrics for Policy Making (GNSO Non-PDP) | ||||||||
| 2) Description: | The 2010 Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG) identified the Meta Issue: Uniformity of Reporting which it described as "need for more uniformity in the mechanisms to initiate, track, and analyze policy-violation reports." The RAPWG recommended in its Final Report that "the GNSO and the larger ICANN community in general, create and support uniform problem-reporting and report-tracking processes." The GNSO Council recommended the creation of an Issue Report to further research metrics and reporting needs in hopes to improve the policy development process. The report created by ICANN staff outlined accomplishments regarding reporting and metrics by the Contractual Compliance function and it also reviewed other reporting sources that may be of relevance. The GNSO Council subsequently adopted the recommendation to form this non-PDP Working Group tasked with exploring opportunities for developing reporting and metrics processes and/or appropriate standardized methodologies that could better inform fact-based policy development and decision making. | ||||||||
| 3) Purpose/Goal of Work Effort: | The WG's intent is to develop solutions that will improve the way in which consensus policies are developed and help ensure that the most critical registrant, registry, and registrar issues are addressed by evolving the culture to better informed, fact-based policy development and decision-making. | ||||||||
4) Subject Matter Category: Click here to see a list of categories
| Policy Development | ||||||||
| 5) Subject Matter Sub-Category: (Note: Where applicable, identify the next lower level of Category, e.g., if Category is Policy Development, Sub-Category might be: Whois, IRTP, New gTLD, IDN) | Metrics | ||||||||
| 6) Relative Importance: | Medium | ||||||||
| 7) Date Work Effort Commenced: |
| ||||||||
| 8) Sponsoring/Chartering Organization: | GNSO Council | ||||||||
| 9) ICANN Structures/Groups Involved: | ALAC | ||||||||
| 10) Type of Group Performing Work Effort: | Working Group | ||||||||
| 10A) If Answer To Question 9 Is "Other", Please Specify Here: | |||||||||
| 11) Web Presence Link (if applicable): | |||||||||
| ============================================== | |||||||||
12) Snapshot Activity Data: The effective period for each Snapshot will be the end of one ICANN meeting to the start of the next, e.g., ICANN53 (25 Jun 2015) - ICANN54 (18 Oct 2015)
| |||||||||
| Name | Date Satisfied/Confirmed | Notes |
KAB | 02-Aug-2016 |
SOAC Work Effort Template v3 (Aug 2016)
