Transcript

Transcript CWG Engagement Session_BA 22 Jun 2015.doc

Transcript CWG Engagement Session_BA 22 Jun 2015.pdf

Recording

The audio recording is available here: http://audio.icann.org/meetings/buenosaires2015/cwg-stewardship-engagement-22jun15-en.mp3

For recordings in other languages see here:  https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-cwg-stewardship-engagement

Chat Transcript

  Brenda Brewer: (6/22/2015 14:42) Hello, my name is Brenda and I will be monitoring this chat room. In this role, I am the voice for the remote participants, ensuring that they are heard equally with those who are “in-room” participants. When submitting a question that you want read out loud over the microphone, please provide your name and affiliation if you have one, start your sentence with <QUESTION> and end it with <QUESTION>. When submitting a comment that you want read out loud over the mic, provide your name and affiliation if you have one then start your sentence with <COMMENT> and end it with <COMMENT>.  Text outside these quotes will be considered as part of “chat” and will not be read out loud on the mic.Any questions or comments provided outside of the session time will not be read aloud.

  Brenda Brewer: (14:42) All chat sessions are being archived and follow the ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior: http://www.icann.org/en/news/in-focus/accountability/expected-standards

  Brenda Brewer: (14:45) Please note that audio is may be available in other UN Languages: https://buenosaires53.icann.org/en/schedule/mon-cwg-stewardship-engagement

  McTim: (14:47) Hi Brenda, I will have some questions that i would like you to ask when the discussion reaches the IANA Trademark issue, should I submit them now?

  Brenda Brewer: (14:48) you certainly may McTim.

  McTim: (14:52) ok, here is one; <QUESTION>Given that the numbers community calls for IANA trademark to go to IETF trust and the IETF response (no objection to it going to the IETF Trust as numbers community proposes);Where is the record of the CWG discussion of the current IANA trademark text? What was the community discussion that led to this, and where's the record of that? <QUESTION>

  McTim: (14:52) and

  McTim: (14:53) <QUESTION>Where did the the IANA trademark language in their latest draft come from? When was it inserted?Why did it take a position opposite the numbers community proposal?  <QUESTION>

  McTim: (14:53) and a commnet at the end of those questions;

  McTim: (14:54) <COMMENT>For CWG  to make this last minute change without any actual discussion by the CWG is bad enough, but completely ignores community-based processes that are supposed to be the foundation of the transition. <COMMENT>

  Brenda Brewer: (14:54) Thank you McTim.

  McTim: (14:55) thank you!

  McTim: (15:25) Brenda, will the other question be asked?

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:28) Sorry McTim, your other question was answered in the Chairs' response

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:34) The hub question was from Murray McKercher in the Canada hub

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:35) All -- you can read the Final Proposal here: https://community.icann.org/x/aJ00Aw

  McTim: (15:36) @Grace, was it/ i only saw: "THIS IS BASED ON A LEGAL MEMORANDUM. "  Which is not really an explanation of if/where/when any discussion was carried out.

  McTim: (15:36) and my commnet wasn't read out either was it?

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:39) @McTim, as the Chair clarified in his response, the term sheet in the proposal is a draft of what needs to be further developed during implementation. As a draft, the text is not perscriptive.

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:39) I neglected to read your comment, and will do so. My apologies

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:40) *applause in room*

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:40) All CWG-Stewardship drafts and meeting notes are archived on the Wiki here: https://community.icann.org/x/37fhAg.

  Greg Shatan: (15:42) The "IANA Managing Director"  -- the top executive in PTI -- also could be called the President.

  Cheryl Langdon-Orr: (15:43) Hi Grace I have finally made it back to the Sheraton having wrapped up our NomCom work for today

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:43) Thank you Cheryl. Welcome!

  James Gannon: (15:43) President/CEO/Executive Director/Managing Director depends on the country that the person describing the top management is from. But Greg is correct it refers to the top level of the intenal management structure

  Helen Han: (15:53) I am Helen Han from IGR, I have a question about the 2nd CWG draft proposal. I remembered there are three actors relevant to IANA function clearly demonstrated in the first proposal last December, NTIA as the administrator, ICANN as the operator, and VERISIGN as the maintainer, any root file changing requests should follow a fixed procedure step by step. My question is, is there still three actors in the 2nd proposal, coz I did not find this description, however, PTI is controlled by ICANN, so is it mean that ICANN are both the administrator and operator or are the the administrator and operator function integrated in the new mechanism?

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:53) Hi @Helen -- the queue is closed, but we will note your question for the record and try to address this

  Helen Han: (15:54) Thank you Grace

  Grace Abuhamad: (15:55) Hi @Helen, for the response: The NTIA addressed the transition of the Root Zone Maintainer function will be a separate process in its “IANA Functions and Related Root Zone Management Transition Questions and Answers” on 18 March 2014. See http://www.ntia.doc.gov/other-publication/2014/iana-functions-and-related-root-zone-management-transition-questions-and-answ for further details.

  Helen Han: (15:59) thank you. but what about the administrator and the operator? are they integrated  in the new mechanism?

  Grace Abuhamad: (16:00) It's going to be a separate process.

  Grace Abuhamad: (16:02) The CWG recommended that the authorization function was no longer needed. For signficant changes to the Root Zone environment, the CWG recommended that there be a standing committee of technical experts to advise the ICANN Board.

  Brenda Brewer: (16:04) Thank you for your participation.  This session has concluded.