You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 24 Next »

 

 

 No.RecommendationRecipient 1Recipient 2Recipient 3Thematic Group SourceAssigneesNotesStatus
10

The next evolution of language services must adopt further extension of live scribing for all meetings and generally extend the current interpretation and translation processes and make translation available in a timely manner.

     

Evaluated Caption First which offers an Adobe Connect plugin for live scribing on the Joint Accessibility WG/ Technology Taskforce meeting 2014-09-08. See ATLAS2 Recommendation 11 for screenshots and overview.

  • ICANN Language Services provides interpretation for
    • At-Large F2F meetings in English, Spanish and French
    • English, Spanish, French and Russian  for ALAC monthly conference calls.
    • English, Spanish and Portuguese for LACRALO monthly calls
    • English, French for AFRALO calls
  • For At-Large WGs, interpretation is provided on request from more than 3 persons attending a call.
  • ICANN Language Services transcribes audio recordings of ALAC/At-Large meetings and provides a transcript in less than a week.

 

 
     11ICANN must implement a range of services to facilitate access according to various criteria (gender; cultural diversity) and user needs (disabilities, etc…).ICANN BoardICANN Staff TG2

Accessibility

Technology Task Force

See ATLAS2 Recommendation 11

(As per Rec 10) ICANN Language Services provides interpretation for for ALAC/At-Large F2F meetings and ALAC and for some RALO conference calls.

However, they do not as of yet provide support for people with disabilities and special needs during working groups or conference calls.

Evaluated Caption First which offers an Adobe Connect plugin for live scribing on two calls (as per Rec 10)

A special budget request to conduct a pilot program to live caption 6 meetings/calls a month has been submitted to the FBSC

The TTF also evaluated “Craptions to Captions”, an open source tool for captioning videos. See  Technology Taskforce meeting 2015-01-26

Also, the TTF looked at Amara, www.amara.org , a subtitle editor that makes it easy to caption and translate videos. Amara also hosts volunteer localization & accessibility communities.

The TTF notes the progress of machine translation tools such as Skype Translator Preview and the already available Google Translate mobile app. (added May 18) Skype Translator Preview for Windows 8/Phone (which allows for machine transcribing of voice and IM) will be reviewed by the TTF on Technology Taskforce meeting 2015-05-18

The TTF is working with ICANN IT staff to have a new version of the machine translation tools used for the LACRALO English and Spanish mailing lists. See https://community.icann.org/x/z4VZAg

 

 

 

 



Also beginning the process for testing captioning of all videos. Glenn McKnight will be demoing some of these at the next TTF call.  )

 
26

Current policy management processes within ICANN are insufficient. ICANN must implement  a workable Policy Management Process System, available for use across the SO/ACs, in order to:

  • enhance Knowledge Management,
  • improve the effectiveness of all ICANN volunteer communities,
  • improve cross-community policy-specific activity,
  • enhance policy development metrics,
  • facilitate multilingual engagement,
  • create a taxonomy of policy categories,
  • provide policy development history as an aid for newcomers.
ICANN BoardICANN Staff (Policy) TG5

Social Media,

Technology Task Force

Capacity Building

What do we want in a Policy Management Process System?

  1. To quickly find historical information on a policy issue
    For example, find policy history on “new gTLDs” and get a report in chronological order.
    Such searches could be further refined (e.g show history in past 4 years) or show the submissions made by a particular AC/SO on a policy issue. Such searches could be visualized using a timeline (e.g http://codyhouse.co/gem/vertical-timeline/). A system would have the policy history stored in a manner to allow for such queries.
  2. To subscribe to policy updates/notifications by interest
    For a person who has a keen interest in certain policy issues (e.g IDNs), persons should be able to subscribe to receive updates on specific policy issues with links to where the discussions are happening for that AC/SO.

    This is where a taxonomy of policy categories to be defined for past, current and future/upcoming policies. Furthermore, a policy system could track past user interactions, so that if a person commented on a particular policy issue (e.g WHOIS), they could be notified of new, related policy issues for their review.

  3. Track deadlines for responding to policy comments
    With multiple policy comment periods happening simultaneously at different stages, a system should update a calendar or other system for the AC/SO to track and manage deadlines.

  4. The ability to read policy issues and updates in your language
    Comment Periods on Policies posted for review are posted in English with translated policy  documents being uploaded at a later time. Persons should be able to subscribe to notifications when policies are available in their language to review.

  5. Having the policy review process more accessible to mobile users.
    With more and more users using mobile devices, the policy review process should be made accessible to such users to engage in the policy process.

  6. Reduce the manual duplication to disseminate information.
    AC/SOs expend a lot of effort to manually copying and pasting text in order to disseminate policy information to the communities and to the wider public (wiki pages, emails, sharing on social media). A system should offer sharing mechanisms so that persons wanting to get the word out can do so more easily.

  7. What do you want in a Policy Management Process System?

     

    ----------------------------------------------

The At-Large Website Redesign is underway - part of the website design attempts to provide a policy background on policy issues as well as to create a taxonomy of policy categories and highlight policy metrics. A mockup of the Website can be viewed at https://new-atlarge.herokuapp.com/

The TTF will be reviewing the Policy Development Processes  at the Regional Internet Registries (RIRs) to see what could be adapted for At-Large Policy Development

 

Chairs of these 3 WGs to discuss how to tackle this task.

See Post ATLAS II Implementation - Recommendation 26

  • Follow-up, depending on the status update on the SOs/ACs Chairs & ICANN Leadership Meeting on Friday 6 Feb
17ICANN needs to be sensitive to the fact that social media are blocked in certain countries and, in conjunction with technical bodies, promote credible alternativesICANN GSE StaffICANN CIIO

 

TG2

Technology Task Force ;
Social Media

At-Large Workshop on “TOR and alternative naming mechanisms to the DNS” held at ICANN Singapore 2014
https://community.icann.org/x/7CPRAg

TTF has looked at Group Chat services (https://community.icann.org/x/Hr3hAg) such as Slack, HipChat and Hall.

At-Large Social Media WG is researching alternative social media platforms where traditional ones are blocked.

While the TTF considered listing several platforms/services that allow access to blocked services, it was felt that even listing such services could be construed as endorsing breaking of national laws, irrespective of whether we (global At-Large) think such laws/restrictions are unjust.

 


 



 

 
29The ALAC should implement an automated system for tracking topics of interest currently being discussed among the various RALOs, and accessible by everyone.ALAC 

 

TG5
  • Capacity Building
  • Technology Task Force
  • Social Media

The TTF looking to syndicate RALO topics across all RALO wiki pages using the Confluence’s wiki capabilities.

Wiki addons such as Confluence Questions (http://bit.ly/1EUah6O) & group chat applications may allow for such crowdsourcing of topic discussions ;
TTF to continue evaluation

To ensure regular updates from RALO chairs and secretariats in a form suitable for sharing, a template to standardise the information collected from RALOs is being developed

 

 
     31ICANN and the ALAC should investigate the use of simple tools and methods to facilitate participation in public comments, and the use of crowdsourcing.ALAC;ICANN GSE Staff

 

 

TG5

The TTF is to review tools such as Liquid Feedback ( http://liquidfeedback.org/ )

The TTF is currently evaluating Loomio (https://www.loomio.org/) an online tool for collaborative decision-making

 

 
39ICANN should encourage “open data” best practices that foster re-use of the information by any third party.ICANN Staff 

 

TG5
  • Technology Task Force

A significant amount of information produced by ICANN and At-Large over the years is already public however, its not stored in an organised way, (wikis, websites) making information hard to locate and to re-use.
 
The TTF is reviewing how best to implement open data standards. Some of the resources on Open Data include:

The Open Data Handbook http://opendatahandbook.org/

Open Data Guide (http://opendata.guide/)

Open Data Foundation (http://opendatafoundation.org/)


(older notes - To the extent that ICANN has data sets that do not contain personal identifying information these should be open and we can work with those groups to advise them on best practices. Most examples focus on Open Government and much of the data of businesses and non profits are not Open or accessible. Research on similar examples did to be done so we can assess whether ICANN is typical or laggards to the access to information

http://gcn.com/articles/2014/02/07/open-data-best-practices.aspx

Abide to the Digital Accountability and Transparency Act

Resource http://opendatafoundation.org )

 

 

Note: The recommendations highlighted in yellow target the ICANN Board.  

 

  • No labels