Please provide comments to Section 9, Improving Communication and Coordination with ICANN Structures, in the table below (you must be logged in to edit the table and provide your comments).
| Comment # | Working Text Reference | Working Text Page # | Comment Provided By | Comment - Working Party Members Provide Feedback Here |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 99 | Stephanie Perrin | Over my 30 years in the Canadian government I was involved at the working level (Senior analyst/manager/ director) in many international organizations, either directly or as part of a team where other members represented us more actively. This would include the ITU, COE, GATT, trade negotiations such as FTA and NAFTA, G8 and G20 meetings, and notably in my case the OECD and the International Conference of Data Commissioners. In this context, I find the GAC to be one of the more peculiar committees that I have seen. I am curious as to why ICANN responds the way it has done over the past years, and interested in the GNSO efforts to further systematize the way GAC “advice” is analyzed and acted upon. I would suggest that it requires further study. I would be grateful if this committee could point me to further reading on the GAC, its evolution and representation, and the background to the strategic approach which the Board has taken in heeding GAC advice. | |
| 2 | ||||
| 3 | ||||
| 4 | ||||
| 5 |
