You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 66 Next »

Topic

Entry Date

Target Date

Responsible Council Member (if applicable)

Responsible Staff member (if applicable)

Additional Notes

Status / Action Item

Los Angeles Meeting Planning


Develop the proposed agenda for GNSO weekend session in Los Angeles

26/611/10

 

Glen de Saint Gery / Marika Konings 

Please provide input via the meeting survey: https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/QMQJY7Z

 

Note that the next GNSO Council Development session will be held on Friday 17 October - Council members that are continuing after the LA meeting as well as newly elected Council members are requested to mark this date in their calendars.

Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions

23/1OngoingJonathan RobinsonMarika Konings

.

GNSO / CCNSO initiated CWG on Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions

  • Up to 4 participants from the GNSO for the Charter Drafting Team only at this stage
  • One per SG
  • Please supply names ASAP and before 4th July
  • Group to first meet on 14 July
 
Coordination Group on Transition of NTIA's Stewardship of the IANA Functions
SSAC Liaison to GNSO Council / GNSO Council liaison to the SSACBA wrap up session24/7Jonathan RobinsonJulie Hedlund Jonathan to explore with Patrik Falstrom the options for a SSAC liaison to the GNSO and/or visa versa.
IDN Variants27/324/7Jonathan RobinsonMary WongA response was received from Ram Mohan in response to the suggestion to explore a possible policy liaison to the IDN Variants Panel (see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg15958.html).IDN Variants primer session as well as follow up meeting held in London. Jonathan to write note to Ram (draft to be provided by Mary) to follow up on discussions in London.
Strategic Plan8/525/6Jonathan RobinsonMarika KoningsSee https://www.icann.org/public-comments/stratplan-draft-2014-04-09-en

COMPLETED

Council decided not to provide any input at this stage, but Council members are encouraged to consider whether in the future there would be an interest / need to provide input from a Council perspective similar to what the ccNSO Council does.

Whois Requirements and National Law Conflicts Procedure Review6/625/6Jonathan RobinsonMarika KoningsSee https://www.icann.org/public-comments/whois-conflicts-procedure-2014-05-22-en

COMPLETED

Update provided to the GNSO Council in London. Reply comments may be submitted until 1 August.

GNSO Council Liaison to Thick Whois Implementation Review Team6/624/7Jonathan RobinsonMarika Konings Jonathan to confirm with Amr, who is already a member of the IRT, whether he would be willing to serve as the Council liaison to that effort.
Issues for the SCI - voting thresholds6/624/7Avri Doria / Alan GreenbergMarika Konings Alan and Avri volunteered to scope out the issue of voting thresholds in relation to implementation changes to adopted PDP recommendations for Council review. The Council will consider at a future meeting whether or not to refer this item to the SCI for further review.
Issues for the SCI - amendments to motions6/624/7Jonathan RobinsonMarika Konings Jonathan volunteered to lead the discussion on common understanding of amendments to motions on the Council list as well as the role of the maker & seconder of motions. The Council will consider at a future meeting whether or not to refer this item to the SCI for further review.
GNSO Review6/624/7Jen WolfeMarika Konings Council members are encouraged to review the questions of the 360 assessment and provide feedback by 10 July (see https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/48337497/360%20Introduction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1400714058000&api=v2).
Enhancing ICANN Accountability6/625/6Jonathan RobinsonMarika Konings 

COMPLETED

Issue was further discussed in London. No GNSO Council input has been provided at this stage. Public comment forum closed on 27 June 2014 ((https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2014-05-07-en).

Whois Studies6/625/6Jonathan RobinsonMary Wong Jonathan Robinson to communicate the outcome of the Whois Studies to the GAC Chair. Agenda item for the GAC GNSO meeting on Sunday 22 June 2014 in London.
Charter for a PDP Working Group for the IGO & INGO access to curative rights protection mechanisms PDP6/625/6AllMary Wong 

COMPLETED

Charter was adopted at the GNSO Council meeting in London. A call for volunteers will be circulated shortly.

2 letter character domains public comment forum26/624/7 Marika KoningsTo obtain community input on the proposed amendments to the Registry Agreements of several registry operators to implement a new registry service which would permit the introduction of two-character domain names for registration in the new gTLD namespace resulting from the recently processed Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) requests submitted by several registries a public comment forum has been opened (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/two-char-new-gtld-2014-06-12-en). Reply comments may be submitted until 1 August.Marika to provide GNSO Council with information on previous Council recommendations in relation to this topic as well as how this has been implemented in the AGB so that the Council can determine whether or not to comment (completed).
Facilitation Training (ICANN Academy)26/624/7Thomas Rickert  Thomas to send note note on facilitation training and request for SG/Cs to nominate participants
Expert Working Group Final Report26/624/7Jonathan RobinsonMarika KoningsThe Expert Working Group published its Final Report on 6 June (https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/final-report-06jun14-en.pdf) as part of the Board initiated PDP on the Purpose of gTLD Registration Data.
  • Council has been requested by the ICANN Board to provide feedback / input on how to address the report as part of the PDP that was requested by the ICANN Board. Staff to develop some ideas / suggestions on how Council may tackle the work for further review and discussion.
  • Request Council / SG / C to provide issues for clarification or further explanation so that these can be shared with the EWG for feedback (request circulated - input to be provided by 31 July).
Data in relation to validation requirement under 2013 RAA26/624/7James Bladel 

Registrars are monitoring the impact of the 2013 RAA validation requirement - also requested ICANN and LE to do the same to put together meaningful data to measure costs vs. benefits. Registrars presented stats in London. Recognition that this is having an impact on the industry, which might not be desired. Registrars asking 1) support industry in efforts to halt calls to expand on path chosen, 2) awareness of new requirements is disseminated through community (global requirement).

 

Add to discussion for next GNSO Council meeting
GNSO Liaison to the GAC26/624/7Jonathan RobinsonMarika KoningsThe GNSO Council and GAC approved the proposed requirements and selection process for the GNSO liaison to the GAC in London.Call for volunteers circulated - candidates to be submitted to the GNSO Secretariat by 31 July.
CWG on Internet Governance Charter26/624/7  On behalf of the CWG on Internet Governance, Olivier Crepin-Leblond submitted a proposed charter to the different SO/ACs for further consideration. His note specifically request that the Council looks at the votes and the (lack of) normalisation on a per SO/AC basis. The charter DT could not reach consensus on whether normalisation of votes was needed or not. The CWG leaves it up to the community to provide feedback on preference. (see http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16353.html)Consider charter at next Council meeting.
Outstanding IGO/INGO PDP Recommendations26/624/7Thomas RickertMary WongIn June 2014, the NGPC wrote to the GNSO Council 'with an update on the ongoing work in response to the GNSO policy recommendations regarding Protection of IGO-INGO Identifiers in All gTLDs and the advice from the GAC in its Buenos Aires Communiqué addressing the same topic'. Furthermore the letter noted that 'the NGPC is considering available options to reconcile the differences at issue, including recommending that the ICANN Board reject the conflicting GNSO policy advice (pursuant to the procedure established in the Bylaws). However, before the NGPC recommends any course of action, the NGPC wanted to provide an update to the GNSO to highlight the concerns, and to give the GNSO an opportunity to consider modifying the elements of the approved policy recommendations in accordance with the procedure established in the GNSO Operating Procedures'.
  • Mary to provide GNSO Council with briefing note on process as outlined in PDP Manual (completed)
  • Council to consider and discuss issue prior to next GNSO Council meeting

 

 

new gTLDs subsequent rounds discussion group26/624/7Bret FausettSteve ChanThe GNSO Council agreed to form a discussion group in London to discuss experiences gained by the first round of new gTD applications and identify subjects for possible future issue reports, if any, that might lead to changes or adjustments for subsequent new gTLD application procedures.COMPLETED
  • Call for volunteers to be circulated (Completed).
  • Communicate request for status report to responsible staff (Completed)
  • No labels
For comments, suggestions, or technical support concerning this space, please email: ICANN Policy Department
© 2015 Internet Corporation For Assigned Names and Numbers