You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 4 Current »

This objection ground allows formal objections to be filed by parties with standing if the applied-for gTLD string is contrary to generally accepted legal norms of morality and public order that are recognized under principles of international law.

Extracts from Applicant Guide Book re: Limited Public Interest Objections

(Excerpted from Section 3.5.3, Page 3-20, Page 167 of 352 of AGB)
 
An expert panel hearing a Limited Public Interest objection will consider whether the applied-for gTLD string is contrary to general principles of international law for morality and public order.
 
Examples of instruments containing such general principles include:

 
Note that these are included to serve as examples, rather than an exhaustive list. It should be noted that these instruments vary in their ratification status. Additionally, states may limit the scope of certain provisions through reservations and declarations indicating how they will interpret and apply certain provisions. National laws not based on principles of international law are not a valid ground for a Limited Public Interest objection.
 
Under these principles, everyone has the right to freedom of expression, but the exercise of this right carries with it special duties and responsibilities. Accordingly, certain limited restrictions may apply.
 
The grounds upon which an applied-for gTLD string may be considered contrary to generally accepted legal norms relating to morality and public order that are recognized under principles of international law are:

  • Incitement to or promotion of violent lawless action;
  • Incitement to or promotion of discrimination based upon race, colour, gender, ethnicity, religion or national origin, or other similar types of discrimination that violate generally accepted legal norms recognized under principles of international law;
  • Incitement to or promotion of child pornography or other sexual abuse of children; or
  • A determination that an applied-for gTLD string would be contrary to specific principles of international law as reflected in relevant international instruments of law.

The panel will conduct its analysis on the basis of the applied-for gTLD string itself. The panel may, if needed, use as additional context the intended purpose of the TLD as stated in the application.

 

Formal comments to ICANN's application comment forum during the Application Comment Period (June 13 2012 to August 12 2012) directed to this panel will be considered as part of the application's evaluations.

Any formal comment directed at an evaluation panel regarding an applicant to an gTLD application must have the following:

  • Subject of your comment. The subject field has a limit of 40 characters.
  • Comment and Rationale. The actual comment has a limit of 3,500 characters.

Comments directed to the evaluation panels should:

  • Be directed to the relevant evaluation panel (e.g., an application comment directed to the Financial Capability evaluation panel should cover topics relevant to application questions 45-­-50). If your comment is irrelevant to the reviews performed by the panel to which it is directed, it will not be considered.
  • Provide rationale for relevancy to selected panel's evaluations
  • Be as factual as possible
  • Include sources or references if available

Comments can be submitted in any language. Right-­-to-­-left scripts will be disiplayed left-­-aligned in the comment field.

ICANN reserves the right to remove comments that do not adhere to ICANN Expected Standards of Behavior and ICANN's Open Comment Forum Process and Standards.

 

(Source : the Application Comments User Guide at the new gTLD Application Comment Forum )

 

 

 

 

 

  • No labels