You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 7 Current »

The meeting of the GNSO Temp Spec gTLD RD EPDP – Phase 2 is scheduled on Thursday, 16 January 2020 at 14:00 UTC for 2 hours.

For other times: https://tinyurl.com/s4o384f

PROPOSED AGENDA


  1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)

2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

3. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes)

      a. Legal Committee Update

4. Discussion of models for inclusion / recommendation in Initial Report

      a) CPH Proposal

      b) Mark SV slides

      c) EPDP Team reactions

      d) Possible alternative approaches

      e) Confirm next steps

5. Commence review of input received on draft Initial Report

      a. See issues list – https://community.icann.org/x/BQZxBw

      b. Confirm next steps

6. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes):

     a) Thursday 23 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC

     b) Confirm action items

     c) Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any


BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS





Meeting Audio Cast (for observers)

To join the event, click on the link: 

Listen in browser:  http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01

Listen in application such as iTunes: http://stream.icann.org:8000/stream01.m3u 

RECORDINGS

PARTICIPATION


Attendance 

Apologies:  Margie Milam (BC)

Alternates: Steve DelBianco (BC)

Notes/ Action Items



EPDP Phase 2 - Meeting #40

Proposed Agenda

Thursday, 16 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC


1. Roll Call & SOI Updates (5 minutes)

2. Confirmation of agenda (Chair)

a. Welcome and housekeeping issues (Chair) (5 minutes)

b. Legal Committee Update


  • Legal Committee’s questions were circulated yesterday. Please register any concerns by tomorrow, 12:00 UTC – the questions will be sent to Bird & Bird. If there are minor questions, objections or modifications, the Legal Committee could do a quick modification/discussion and second silent procedure by Monday, COB Los Angeles. If there is another objection, it will go to plenary on Thursday.
  • There seems to be some duplication within the questions. It would be helpful if this Team can accept B&B’s advice in good faith?
  • Is there a reason the reverse look-ups question was included when it was original WHOIS feature – this seems potentially wasteful.
  • Some members believe it is important to seek further legal advice on this matter.
  • Please submit proposed modifications by COB tomorrow, Friday, 17 January. Legal Committee will review the objections during its next Legal Committee. Questions not objected to will be sent to B&B on Monday.

3.Discussion of models for inclusion / recommendation in Initial Report

-                A small team met twice yesterday to discuss the CPH proposal

-                There was one clear agreement and understanding – when it comes to initial steps related to accreditation -these functions should be automated to the extent possible.

-                CPH proposal could constitute a good basis for the work. However, some groups (GAC, BC, IPC) consider that CPH proposal is not going far enough, and the preferred option would be a fully centralized system. Discussed the possibility of a more dynamic approach, wherein the disclosure could be done in a combination of ways – some full y automated and some could be fully manual due to the nature of the disclosure request. The smaller group will continue online deliberations and submit a proposal before the next meeting on Thursday, 23 January.

-                Awaiting GAC’s proposal for accreditation for law enforcement

-                Aim is to formulate evolution and transformation as we go – currently, the aim is to solve how to put this in writing


  1. a)CPH Proposal
  2. b)Mark SV slides
  3. c)EPDP Team reactions
  4. d)Possible alternative approaches
  5. e)Confirm next steps


4.Commence review of input received on draft Initial Report 

5. See issues list – https://community.icann.org/x/BQZxBw


  • Question of inclusion of use cases: currently, they are referenced via a URL
  • Use cases were intended to be a discussion tool and not a finished product. They were intended to be used to develop the building blocks – concerned with including these in the Initial (or Final) report. Recommend not including them at all, even as a hyperlink
  • Explore including an example use case as part of the report
  • Action: Support Staff to clearly state the context of the use cases – prepared but not agreed, used to finetune thinking – those who are interested can reference, but these were not agreed and do not constitute policy recommendations.
  • ISPCP is offering to propose language in reference to the recommendation – that may help the team decide if this is helpful.

6. Confirm next steps


  1. Wrap and confirm next EPDP Team meeting (5 minutes):
  2. a)Thursday 23 January 2020 at 14.00 UTC
  3. b)Confirm action items
  4. c)Confirm questions for ICANN Org, if any



  • No labels