You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 9 Current »

The Review of all Rights Protection Mechanisms (RPMs) Sub Team for Trademark Claims Data Review is scheduled on Wednesday, 08 May 2019 at 17:00 UTC for 60 minutes. 

10:00 PDT, 13:00 EDT, 19:00 Paris CEST, 22:00 Karachi PKT, (Thursday) 02:00 Tokyo JST, (Thursday) 03:00 Melbourne AEST

For other times:  https://tinyurl.com/y6js2j34

PROPOSED AGENDA


Proposed Agenda for Next Meeting

Here is a proposed agenda for the meeting on Wednesday, 8 May at 17:00 UTC:

  1. Review agenda/updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs)
  2. Development of Preliminary Recommendations:
    1. Continue discussing agreed Trademark Claims Charter Question 4
    2. Discuss agreed Trademark Claims Charter Question 5
  3. AOB

Resource

Summary Table (as of 16 April 2019) contains draft answers, preliminary recommendations, and links to the relevant individual proposals in relation to the Agreed Charter Questions:https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/102138613/%5BClaims%20Summary%20Table%5D%20%2816%20April%202019%29.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1555515784000&api=v2

  • Q1: pp.3-6
  • Q2: pp.6-12
  • Q3: pp.12-16
  • Q4: pp.16-20
  • Q5: pp.20-22

Relevant to the Agreed Trademark Claims Charter Questions, multiple individual proposals were submitted. Staff analysis concluded the following Individual Proposals are more relevant to the Agreed Trademark Claims Charter Questions being reviewed by the Sub Team in the homework assignment:

 

Documents Wiki

Access the Documents wiki page and find the opening messages of all discussion threads, all versions of the summary table, and other working documents of the Sub Team:https://community.icann.org/x/9YIWBg.

BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS



RECORDINGS


Mp3

Zoom recording

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

PARTICIPATION


Attendance & chat

Apologies: Michael Graham, Zak Muscovitch

Notes/ Action Items


Action Items:

  1. Sub Team members will review discussion threads on:
    1. Q1 (including Proposals #5 & #6): https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-April/000324.html
    2. Q2 (including Proposals #1 & #12): https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-April/000318.html
    3. Q3: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-April/000325.html
    4. Q4: http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/gnso-rpm-trademark/2019-May/000331.html
  2. Question 1, Proposal 6: Staff is checking with ICANN Org.
  3. Staff will update the summary table based on the transcript/recording from the meeting.

Brief Notes:

  1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.
  2. Development of Preliminary Recommendations: Continue discussing agreed Trademark Claims Charter Question 4

-- If we can get the notice right it could help potential registrants in flagging when there could be an issue, bringing to their awareness the possibility that there could be an issue.

-- Probably goes too far to expand to all non-exact matches, but could expand to match-plus, but not so widely to capture scenarios that are clearly non-infringing.

-- 4(a) -- Do we have any evidence of harm?  Doesn’t seem to be.

-- Could identify some limited non-exact matches that could be added.  There also is Michael Graham’s proposal.


  • No labels