Please find the meeting information below for the GNSO Drafting Team to Further Develop Guidelines and Principles for the GNSO’s Roles and Obligations as a Decisional Participant in the Empowered Community call on Wednesday, 15 May 2019 at 21:00 UTC for 60 minutes.
14:00 PDT, 17:00 EDT, 23:00 Paris CEST, (Thursday) 02:00 Karachi PKT, (Thursday) 06:00 Tokyo JST, (Thursday) 07:00 Melbourne AEST
For other times: https://tinyurl.com/yyqpjlvm
PROPOSED AGENDA
Draft Agenda:
- Review agenda/updates to Statements of Interest
- Brief Update on the Timeline
- Article 4 Accountability and Review - 4.3 Independent Review Process (IRP) for Covered ICANN Actions, and Annex D: EC Mechanism – 4.2 Community IRP – final version for review/approval (attached)
- Section 18.12 Special IFRs:
- Guidelines for How to Use the GNSO Input Process for a Special IFR – See:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1uNXALBljWRf6rJcOqSCLoOo_4Axe188Mp5JWxnfb_lI/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com]
- Status of Guidelines for GNSO-ccNSO Consultation on Initiating a Special IFR
5. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum – Review initial draft (attached)
6. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum – Review initial draft (attached)
7. AOB
BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS
GUIDELINES & MOTION TEMPLATE_ SECTION 1.3 APPROVAL ACTION COMMUNITY FORUM DRAFT 30 April 2019.docx
RECORDINGS
PARTICIPATION
Notes/ Action Items
Actions:
- Timeline: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review.
- Section 18.12 Special IFRs: David McAuley will redraft Section 4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes
- Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.
- Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.
Notes:
- Updates to Statements of Interest: No updates.
2. Timeline:
ACTION: Staff will communicate with GNSO Council Leadership to see if they want a DT update on the agenda for ICANN65 to provide an update and present the documents that have been submitted for Council review.
3. Section 18.12 Special IFRs
a. Guidelines for How to Use the GNSO Input Process for a Special IFR
4.1 Introduction
-- “Must select a decision process and document its deliberations and decisions. Council [may use the GIP to determine]...” -- keep it simple.
-- Or could say, “should consider”.
4.3 and 4.4: -- Resolve Wolf-Ulrich’s comment -- don’t make the change. This reflects the order of the GIP.
4.5 GIP Outcomes and Processes
-- Question: Section 4.5 GIP will be seeking input from SOs/ACs, but it’s not clear if this has happened or will be in conjunction with ccNSO.
-- Interpret as ccNSO and GNSO doing it together and it would have been completed.
-- There is also the issue of public comment. It is confusing in this document.
-- Need to note the time for consultation with SOs/ACs and public comment.
-- Flag for redrafting. See suggested language in the text by Steve DelBianco.
ACTION: David McAuley agreed to review and redraft.
b. ccNSO/GNSO guidelines
-- staff is drafting, inquiry into ICANN Legal on initiation of a Special IFR
-- Maxim’s concerns about what is the “consultation”?
-- Make it clear in the guidelines what the outcome is with the discussion with Legal.
4. Section 1.3 Approval Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.
5. Section 2.2 Petition Process for Specified Actions and 2.3 Rejection Action Community Forum: ACTION: Staff will revise after considering ccNSO GRC guidelines and send for review.
