You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 46 Next »

Download the consolidated URS Proposals submitted by individual working group members here

Consolidated URS Proposals from Individual WG Members.pdf

    I. Suggested Operational Fix

    Order No. Proponent Topic Deferred to Phase 2? File Tentative Presentation Date Status
    1 Kristine Dorrain

    B. NOTICE

    3. Other topics


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    2 Maxim Alzoba

    F. REMEDIES

    2. Duration of Suspension Period

    3. Review of Implementation


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    3 Zak Muscovitch

    F. REMEDIES

    2. Duration of Suspension Period

    3. Review of Implementation


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    4 George Kirikos

    F. REMEDIES

    4. Other topics


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    II. Draft Policy Recommendation 

    Order No.

    Proponent Topic (Mapped to the Super Consolidated URS Topics Table) Deferred to Phase 2? File Tentative Presentation Date
    5 George Kirikos

    A. THE COMPLAINT

    3. Limited filing period

    Yes

    6 Claudio DiGangi

    A. THE COMPLAINT

    8. Other topics


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    7 George Kirikos

    B. NOTICE

    1. Receipt by registrant (Notice - feedback from Complainant & Respondent)

    Yes

    8 George Kirikos

    C. RESPONSE

    1. Duration of response period

    Yes

    9 David McAuley

    C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

    1. Duration of response period

    ==

    G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

    2. De novo review


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    10 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    C. RESPONSE (primary topic)

    1. Duration of response period

    ==

    G. APPEAL (secondary topic)

    2. De novo review


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    11 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    C. RESPONSE

    3. Response fee


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    12 George Kirikos

    D. STANDARD OF PROOF

    1. General

    Yes

    13 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies


    TBD



    14 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies


    TBD


    15 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    16 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    F. REMEDIES

    1. Scope of remedies

    2. Duration of suspension period


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    17 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    F. REMEDIES

    2. Duration of suspension period


    TBD


    18 George Kirikos

    G. APPEAL

    1. Appeals process

    Yes

    19 George Kirikos

    G. APPEAL

    1. Appeals process

    Yes



    20 George Kirikos

    G. APPEAL

    1. Appeals process

    Yes

    21 Marie Pattullo (AIM - European Brands Association)

    I. COST

    1. Cost allocation model


    TBD



    22 Brian Winterfeldt; Christopher Thomas; Colin O’Brien; Griffin Barnett; Jeff Neuman; John McElwaine; Lori Schulman; Pascal Boehner; Paul McGrady; Susan Payne

    I. COST

    1. Cost allocation model


     


    23 George Kirikos

    I. COST

    1. Cost allocation model

    Yes

    24 George Kirikos

    J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

    1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    25 Zak Muscovitch

    J. LANGUAGE ISSUES

    1. Language issues, including current requirements for complaint, notice of complaint, response, determination


     

    PRESENTATION COMPLETED

    26 Zak Muscovitch

    M. URS PROVIERS

    1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)


     


    27 Zak Muscovitch

    M. URS PROVIERS

    1. Evaluation of URS providers and their respective processes (including training of panelists)


     


    28 Zak Muscovitch

    M. URS PROVIERS

    2. Conflict of interest


     


    29 George Kirikos

    M. URS PROVIDERS

    (no applicable subheading at present)

    Yes



    30 George Kirikos

    N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

    1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g. summary procedure in the UDRP

    Yes

    31 David McAuley

    (no applicable subheading at present)


     


    III. Other 

    Order No. Proponent Topic Deferred to Phase 2?
    File Tentative Presentation Date
    32 George Kirikos

    N. ALTERNATIVE PROCESSES

    1. Possible alternative(s) to the URS, e.g., summary procedure in the UDRP


     


    33 George Kirikos (no applicable subheading at present) Yes



    Click the files below to quickly download URS Proposals. You may click "Download All" at the bottom to mass download all URS Proposals.

    No files shared here yet.



    • No labels